Hot 100: #1 for DWAS, early prediction with STRONG lead

[dit 45,539]

1 minute ago, Economy said:

That Gracie song is rising fast so who knows in coming weeks. Its not a threat this week yet because of radio gap but in could be soon

yeah it is smashing very quickly! hopefully DWAS can block for a second week at least. I just want Gaga to get another multi week #1. Itss been since Born This Way!

[PartySick 146,454]

5 hours ago, Economy said:

But now its basically on lock unless some major surprise release from a big artist ruins everything

Rita Ora as we speak

[PartySick 146,454]

What happens when Rihanna drops a surprise single to distract from her man's media trouble huh

[Economy 47,411]

3 minutes ago, dit said:

yeah it is smashing very quickly! hopefully DWAS can block for a second week at least. I just want Gaga to get another multi week #1. Itss been since Born This Way!

Id love a multi week at #1 as well but it could be tough.

 

If it doesnt happen tho ill by happy with 1 week at #1 as a peak and then just a long time at top 10

 

Tbh when it comes to a songs legacy chart followers and magazines and critics etc mainly mention and remember a songs peak not how long it was there for (unless it was really long and record breaking like Old Town Road or A Bar Song which DWAS has no chance of at this point anyway).

 

So whether its 1 week at #1 or 3 weeks it wont have a significant impact long term on a singles perceived chart success. The #1 peak is what matters

 

So getting the #1 peak is the big deal. After that, getting multiple weeks would just be a cute bonus

 

Edited December 29, 2024 by Economy

[Teletubby 136,794]

Just now, PartySick said:

Rita Ora as we speak

we need her song with Prince

 

[PartySick 146,454]

2 minutes ago, Peppa Pig said:

we need her song with Prince

 

Woah I did not know she was an Englishman that caught me off guard 

[Economy 47,411]

2 minutes ago, PartySick said:

What happens when Rihanna drops a surprise single to distract from her man's media trouble huh

I love Rihanna but lets be honest, shes gonna keep dangling her next single in our eyes and never release it like when Companies promise you a good raise if you do well but then string u along every year with 2% or 3% because "it wasnt a good financial year for the company"

[PartySick 146,454]

Just now, Economy said:

I love Rihanna but lets be honest, shes gonna keep dangling her next single in our eyes and never release it like when Companies promise you a good raise if you do well but then string u along every year with 2% or 3% because "it wasnt a good financial year for the company"

She's a billionaire anyway and therefore part of my "screw every billionaire" opinion.

She can keep her music  

[Economy 47,411]

2 minutes ago, PartySick said:

She's a billionaire anyway and therefore part of my "screw every billionaire" opinion.

She can keep her music  

I agree but if im gonna be honest and unbiased, even Gaga is way too rich

 

Of course I dont hate Gaga (or even Rihanna). They found success in this system that we have and u can only fault them so much as individuals

 

But yeah, the system is screwed up for letting anyone get that rich and that includes ppl at Gagas level tbh

[PartySick 146,454]

1 minute ago, Economy said:

I agree but if im gonna be honest and unbiased, even Gaga is way too rich

 

Of course I dont hate Gaga (or even Rihanna). They found success in this system that we have and u can only fault them so much as individuals

 

But yeah, the system is screwed up for letting anyone get that rich and that includes ppl at Gagas level tbh

She is, I 100% agree  

Billionaires draw my ire the most but anyone on a private jet or living in a castle in Malibu can bite me tbqh

[lastpopicon 4,266]

i heard this story before  if it doesn't happen dwas still the biggest song in the world and it remained stable even on Christmas, who cares if the usa shows the lacking taste once again 

[Economy 47,411]

12 minutes ago, PartySick said:

She is, I 100% agree  

Billionaires draw my ire the most but anyone on a private jet or living in a castle in Malibu can bite me tbqh

I put my limits at around $10M to $20M id say

 

Thats a ball park figure. Of course as far as net worth goes theres also nuance depending on the situation and I might be ok with some ppl going a little higher than that range if the main reason their net worth is high is because they own a big company, real estate for that company, machinery and other expensive tools, inventory etc

 

Some large farms for example can have Millions in assets and still lowkey be cash poor for example

 

Like if your making $1M a year with a highly successful business but have a networth of like $20M+ for said reasons, I might still accept that as acceptable as long as your income is fairly taxed

 

But yeah that is more or less my perception of what wealth limits should be. A big difference from even a few years ago. When Bernie said Billionaites shouldnt exist at first I took that as an extreme statement but it got me thinking more about it and it made me change my mind big time on how I perceive what wealth limits should be if the system was fair

 

Edit: I also now support limits on untaxable cash gifts to children as well as overall limits on how much you can inherit (within reason). Once numbers get high, government should take the rest

Edited December 29, 2024 by Economy

[lastpopicon 4,266]

nvm my comment, the margin is much larger now, this is surely locked 

[eddyjeddy 1,343]

14 hours ago, hijadeputa said:

DWAS you will come down as the song that kept fighting. Finally. GET IT GAGA

Just Dance says HELLO

[Anderson123 35,950]

Justice for Birds of a Feather.  I can’t believe how close it’s been to #1 all this time and hasn’t reached it yet. Very happy for Gaga and Bruno.