Wicked surpasses $450M worldwide and $300M domestically

[Teletubby 153,912]

Universal’s Wicked has flown past $450M worldwide, to become the biggest non-sequel of the year globally. The worldwide cume through Sunday is $455.6M. It also crossed the $300 mark in North America with a domestic total of $320.5 million from 3,885 locations.

[River 120,066]

so not so much from Flopper 2

[Mr Oak 7,722]

Wait what, only 150m budget? Crazy

[Guest]

4 minutes ago, River said:

so not so much from Flopper 2

Move on 

[63grekke 1,440]

see how people actually show up to musicals when a movie has exceptional writing, heartwarming moments, character growth, the absence of rushed romances, an engaging plot with a satisfying conclusion, musical numbers that actually move the plot forward, and most importantly.... a well-crafted storyline.

 

[Guillaume Hamon 6,684]

19 minutes ago, 63grekke said:

see how people actually show up to musicals when a movie has exceptional writing, heartwarming moments, character growth, the absence of rushed romances, an engaging plot with a satisfying conclusion, musical numbers that keep that move the plot forward, and most importantly.... a well-crafted storyline.

 

Joker 2 is so depressing, nowadays people won't watch that indeed...

[JustTea 6,478]

NA carried, international not impressive

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, JustTea said:

NA carried, international not impressive

It's a f*cking success, don't play it down

[Guest]

1 hour ago, JustTea said:

NA carried, international not impressive

What's impressive to you?

[bionic 50,107]

2 minutes ago, AMRer said:

What's impressive to you?

Nothing short of 5 billion

[River 120,066]

1 hour ago, AMRer said:

Move on 

[darkgaga 6,097]

1 hour ago, JustTea said:

NA carried, international not impressive

Quite some countries it only came out last week

[CyanDante 6,191]

It has definitely spent atleast 150-160 mil on promotion and marketing alone.

Probably will need atleast 650-750 mil to break even. Its probably gonna make a billion dollars anyway. 

[PartySick 163,727]

I have absolutely zero desire to see the film adaptation to a 20 year old musical which itself is the loose interpretation of a 30 year old novel which itself is the fan fiction of a 90 year old film which is ITSELF the film adaptation of a 120 year old book  

[bionic 50,107]

47 minutes ago, PartySick said:

I have absolutely zero desire to see the film adaptation to a 20 year old musical which itself is the loose interpretation of a 30 year old novel which itself is the fan fiction of a 90 year old film which is ITSELF the film adaptation of a 120 year old book  

with love and respect this attitude explains so much about you