Teletubby 134,289 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 (edited) “Joker: Folie à Deux” plunged to the No. 12 spot in its fourth weekend of release, collecting a $600,000 from 1,243 venues. The follow-up to 2019’s billion-dollar hit “Joker” has turned into a box office disaster with $57.8 million domestically. Estimated international total stands at $143.3M, estimated global total stands at $201.1M. By comparison, the original “Joker” remained in the top two for five weeks and powered to $335 million domestically and $21.07 billion worldwide. The $200 million-budgeted Warner Bros. sequel won’t get anywhere near those grosses and is poised to lose $150 million to $200 million in its theatrical run. 1. Venom: The Last Dance (Sony) | 4,131 theaters,3-day $51M/Week 1 2. Smile 2 (Par) | 3,624 (+5) theaters 3-day $9.4M (-59%), Total $40.7M/Week 2 3. Conclave (Foc) | 1,753 theaters, 3-day $6.5M/Week 1 4. The Wild Robot (DWA/Uni) | 3,427 (-402) theaters, 3-day $6.5M (-36%), Total $111.3M/Week 5 5. We Live in Time (A24) | 2,924 (+1939) theaters, 3-day $4.8M (+14%), Total $11.7M/Week 3 6. Terrifier 3 (Icon/Cinev) | 2,720 (-42) theaters, 3-day $4.77M (-49%), Total $44.5M/Week 3 7. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (WB) | 2,874 (-377) theaters 3-day $3.23M (-35%) Total $288.7M/Week 8 8. Anora (NEON) | 34 theaters (+28) 3-day $867K (+58%), Total $1.6M/Week 2 9. Piece by Piece (Foc) | 1,298 (-575) theaters, 3-day $720K (-65%), Total: $8.8M/Week 3 10. Transformers One (Par) | 1,422 (-747) theaters, 3-day $720K (-64%) Total $57.9M/Week 6 11. The Substance (MUBI) | 400 (-148) theaters, 3-day $605,5K (-31%) Total $14.5M/Week 6 12. Joker: Folie à Deux (WB) | 1,243(-1,614) theaters, 3-day $600K (-72%) Total $57.8M/Week 4 source source Edited October 27 by Teletubby ⸜(• ◡•)⸝♡🐀💨🚽 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShayCristoforo 10,511 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Honestly the movie is not bad. There are a couple storytelling issues, but it doesn’t deserve to be panned. Continued story about trauma and delusion (with music). I don’t know what everyone was expecting. Some great moments and performances. Get the pinot ready, because it's turtle time. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 102,074 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 This movie isn't even getting to $200M, truly a huge flop. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Didymus 34,379 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 1 minute ago, ShayCristoforo said: Honestly the movie is not bad. There are a couple storytelling issues, but it doesn’t deserve to be panned. Continued story about trauma and delusion (with music). I don’t know what everyone was expecting. Some great moments and performances. "Some great moments and performances" is not enough for an overly long sequel to a beloved film. The thing is that if it didn't absurdly cost $200m (just a reminder that the first one was ca. $60m), it wouldn't have mattered that it underperformed, and there wouldn't be that much disastrous press around it. It's the outrageous financial blunder that is the real enduring story here, not just Todd's creative failure. 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShayCristoforo 10,511 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 2 minutes ago, Didymus said: "Some great moments and performances" is not enough for an overly long sequel to a beloved film. The thing is that if it didn't absurdly cost $200m (just a reminder that the first one was ca. $60m), it wouldn't have mattered that it underperformed, and there wouldn't be that much disastrous press around it. It's the outrageous financial blunder that is the real enduring story here, not just Todd's creative failure. I get that but I’m not talking about the financial side. Just creatively. And I don’t think it was a creative failure, is my point. I personally enjoyed it, and would watch it again. Get the pinot ready, because it's turtle time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar Baby 758 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 A Flop no other way to call it 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brinty 108 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 21 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: This movie isn't even getting to $200M, truly a huge flop. Did u read the OP? "estimated global total stands at $201.1M" 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson123 35,592 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 (edited) A huge disaster. The movie had it's issues but did not deserve to underperform this bad. Even people who watched it a couple of weeks later after the massive hate train were like "Wait it wasn't that bad". I also don't understand how the budget got to 200m when the first one was made with 55m. Edited October 27 by Anderson123 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 102,074 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 7 minutes ago, brinty said: Did u read the OP? "estimated global total stands at $201.1M" It said 193M when I posted. Doesn't make a difference with how horrible this movie performed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 102,074 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 27 minutes ago, Didymus said: "Some great moments and performances" is not enough for an overly long sequel to a beloved film. The thing is that if it didn't absurdly cost $200m (just a reminder that the first one was ca. $60m), it wouldn't have mattered that it underperformed, and there wouldn't be that much disastrous press around it. It's the outrageous financial blunder that is the real enduring story here, not just Todd's creative failure. The facts are this was a disastrous financial failure and also a creative failure. It needs to be studied how bad they ****ed up after a $1B blockbuster. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danbekim 2,975 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I don't think Gaga can come back from this. Her performance in this movie was marvelous, but once again wasted by a terrible movie. This happening right after her latest movie, House of Gucci which was also critically panned over all is no good. I hope she will act again, but in my personal opinion she needs to star in an indie or A24 produced film next. I feel terrible seeing her body of work get hated on by the general public, she deserves much better. If you have some rad remixes you made laying around, send it to me!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
63grekke 1,155 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I’m just glad The Marvels is no longer the biggest flop sequel to a billion dollar movie anymore At least that movie was a fun time, had fun characters, and an actual plot lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 123,478 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShayCristoforo 10,511 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 It wasn’t as good as Chicago, but don’t you guys see a similar concept? The movie really wasn’t that bad. But yes, the budget was too irresponsible. Get the pinot ready, because it's turtle time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeafBug 7,258 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 I hope Ga is ok. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.