Jump to content
other

Cynthia Erivo is not happy about Wicked AI edits


HelloHangoverz
 Share

Featured Posts

RickMonster98

there's people dying kim

it's just an innocent recreation of the original poster is she ok

(and also a big improvent of their mid poster but thats another conv) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Psyduck

Girl, most of the people here wants to erase JFAD on Gaga's filmography. Be grateful :triggered:

keep on looking for Psyduck
  • LMAO 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

MACATL

This is ridiculous.  THE ORIGINAL POSTER DOESN’T SHOW ELPHABA’S EYES.  The fact she is trying to make something out of this makes me not want to see her in this movie.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

MACATL
21 hours ago, RoadToLouis said:

Nobody’s erasing her. It just wasn’t a well executed poster. 

Perfectly executed actually.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

MACATL
9 hours ago, Battle 4 Ur Life said:

I agree they are ridiculous. I get if you’re wanting to play around with the art when you’re a fan but

many fans are toxic and also other people just thinking it’d improve the poster if they covered her face. that mindset’s gross. it probably did not come from that kind of happy spot so I think it suuucks

It came from the “spot” of “let’s make this movie poster look like the musical poster we have seen for 20+ years.”  That’s it. That’s all.  Nothing gross.   Beyond obvious.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hieronymus
3 hours ago, Gorehound said:

Lol Cynthia is that you? :stalkga:

That stock response doesn't really apply here, does jt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hieronymus
2 hours ago, MACATL said:

This is ridiculous.  THE ORIGINAL POSTER DOESN’T SHOW ELPHABA’S EYES.  The fact she is trying to make something out of this makes me not want to see her in this movie.  

Then your want to see her was tenuous at best. If you want to see this movie, you want to see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MACATL
6 minutes ago, hieronymus said:

Then your want to see her was tenuous at best. If you want to see this movie, you want to see it.

Huh?  Where’s your logic?  If the lead actress is going to be this clueless in trying to needlessly stir up controversy and place herself on a cross, then nah, I don’t really care to financially contribute.  Simple.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gorehound
19 minutes ago, hieronymus said:

That stock response doesn't really apply here, does jt?

I'm sorry but are you a troll or something? You're literally the only person on this thread defending Erivo's behaviour. Everyone else on here, or anyone with a bit of sense at least can see that this woman is overreacting to something extremely trivial and harmless and making it all about herself when it's not.

I know it hurts when celebrities we like act in disappointing ways and we feel the need to defend them, but in this day and age people really don't tolerate petty behaviour and speak up against it. Like it or not but she just made herself look bad with these comments, and people will react badly to that. Defend her all you want idc but that's facts.

 

Edited by Gorehound
I'm fine, Ta
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

salty like sodium

So if to edit her face to hide her eyes is erasure, what should we call editing her body to make it fully green then? :messga: Because that feels way worse to me than putting some shadows on her eyes. She literally agreed to self-erasure and is now complaining about something way less important ...

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...