Micheal Jackson molestation allegations by Wade Robson will go to trial

[PatrickMonster 6,957]

1 hour ago, COOOK said:

this article gathers facts and damning evidence about mj's sa allegations and that documentary:

"4. Michael Jackson suffered from the skin discoloration disease vitiligo. Jordie Chandler drew a picture of the markings on the underside of Jackson’s penis. His drawings were sealed in an envelope. A few months later, investigators photographed Jackson’s genitalia. The photographs matched Chandler’s drawings."

"6. Jackson had an extensive collection of adult erotic material he kept in a suitcase next to his bed, including S&M bondage photos and a study of naked boys. Forensic experts with experience in the Secret Service found the fingerprints of boys alongside Jackson’s on the same pages. Jackson also had bondage sculptures of women with ball gags in their mouths on his desk, in full view of the boys who slept there."

"10. In a 2002 documentary, Living with Michael Jackson, Jackson told Martin Bashir there was nothing wrong with sharing his bed with boys."

 

it's pretty bizarre to me the way some fans assume they know their idol, immediately discrediting people who claim they're sa victims. calling them liars, or that their retelling is laughable, is downright dangerous. sa victim cases are a complicated situation. to a certain extent, it makes sense that some of the victims didn't have their stories 100% straight. they were children who allegedly endured trauma, and as we know trauma can impact memory.

what happens behind closed doors, no one knows. past trials have been dismissed, at one point mj's house has been raided and police found nothing, but like i said before, people/companies with power and money are surrounded by strong legal and pr teams, and many real and actual sa victims keep losing trials. what's also real is that a grown adult was involved with children in a way that he shouldn't (comes to mind his documented interest in the part of the indian culture where 30 year-old men could marry 10 year-old girls).

all i can hope for is that, whatever the outcome of this new trial will be, these type of fans or someone they love never go through any kind of abuse.

https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/26/did-jordan-chandlers-description-of-michael-jacksons-penis-match-the-photographs-taken-of-the-stars-genitalia-by-the-police/
 

if he did manage to describe his genitals he would have been arrested right after obviously. The truth is Chandler described a circumsized penis while we know from MJs autopsy that he was uncircumsized.

[DpHitch1992 1,188]

9 minutes ago, PatrickMonster said:

https://themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/26/did-jordan-chandlers-description-of-michael-jacksons-penis-match-the-photographs-taken-of-the-stars-genitalia-by-the-police/
 

if he did manage to describe his genitals he would have been arrested right after obviously. The truth is Chandler described a circumsized penis while we know from MJs autopsy that he was uncircumsized.

No. The description proves the child saw MJ naked, it doesn’t prove sexual abuse. It adds credibility to jordans statement.

The lead detective explains it here: 

There is no source for the circumcision statement. And if he did get it wrong, it's nothing compared to what he got right. This is a 13 year old boy we are talking about. 

Here's Lauren Wies who interviewed Jordan Chandler also confirming the description matched:

 

I don't know how people can see facts like this and still think he's innocent.

[LilMonst3r 5,688]

22 hours ago, PatrickMonster said:

Source?

How you asking for a source for something that has been said for the longest. Like how much research did you really do before you went full force on defending the dead Billionaire Michael Jackson.

[TheARTPOPball 1,728]

5 hours ago, NATAH said:

why is every single thread becoming about kim petras?

Well, for here,  it seems they are using the “lesser of two evils” argument to once again push the “kim petras did nothing wrong” narrative.

This website seems to be polluted with whiny kim fans, that will compare her situation to anything and everything to shift guilt/blame for supporting her. 

[Red 99,558]

Oh, Lord! Again? A-****ing-gain? Nothing new, nothing changed, same old ****, same of ****ing ****!

[LilMonst3r 5,688]

18 hours ago, DpHitch1992 said:

The Lawyer that represents wade and james explains it pretty well here.

The company helped facilitate the sexual abuse.

Idk how people can easily overlook the fact that they would purposely separate the kids from the parents. Like thats some weird ass ****. I feel deep down the parents had a bad feeling but they saw the money being thrown at them and they looked the other way. 

[LilMonst3r 5,688]

7 hours ago, DpHitch1992 said:

No. The description proves the child saw MJ naked, it doesn’t prove sexual abuse. It adds credibility to jordans statement.

The lead detective explains it here: 

There is no source for the circumcision statement. And if he did get it wrong, it's nothing compared to what he got right. This is a 13 year old boy we are talking about. 

Here's Lauren Wies who interviewed Jordan Chandler also confirming the description matched:

 

I don't know how people can see facts like this and still think he's innocent.

Sorry but cant an erect penis look circumcised? Like the skin pulled back can be confused as a circumcised penis, I know it has happened to me.