Hillary Clinton at the Venice Film Festival

[ALGAYDO 30,644]

8 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

Ya still HATE her that much on this cult site!  🙄  

 

I mean, she hasn’t done anything to change any of our minds lol 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,358]

5 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

I mean, she hasn’t done anything to change any of our minds lol 

Trump’s presidency & the aftermath up until now should have changed ya minds!!!  Smh 

 

[ALGAYDO 30,644]

Just now, En_Sabah_Nur said:

Trump’s presidency & the aftermath up until now should have changed ya minds!!!  Smh 

 

Just because Trump is worse, doesn’t mean we have to like the lesser of the two evils, wtf? 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,358]

2 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

Just because Trump is worse, doesn’t mean we have to like the lesser of the two evils, wtf? 

Yes it does. I mean this is the sentiment that inevitably got Roe VS Wade overturned!!!  Smh 

 

[ALGAYDO 30,644]

11 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

Yes it does. I mean this is the sentiment that inevitably got Roe VS Wade overturned!!!  Smh 

 

So we have to support an evil person just because someone else is worse than her? Girl………. 
 

And if you wanna blame someone for Roe, blame the republicans. Blame Trump for appointing idiots to the SC. Blame Ruth for not stepping down while Obama was in office, just because her pride was more important to her than abortion rights. Hell, blame Hilary for not campaigning in states that could’ve won her the election. Don’t blame the people who don’t support greedy, selfish, incapable politicians based solely on their gender. 

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,358]

2 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

So we have to support an evil person just because someone else is worse than her? Girl………. 
 

And if you wanna blame someone for Roe, blame the republicans. Blame Trump for appointing idiots to the SC. Blame Ruth for not stepping down while Obama was in office, just because her pride was more important to her than abortion rights. Hell, blame Hilary for not campaigning in states that could’ve won her the election. Don’t blame the people who don’t support greedy, selfish, incapable politicians based solely on their gender. 

I do blame ALL of those people (including Hillary herself) for her obvious mistakes, but I also blame the people who got caught up in her dumb email "scandal" and about stuff she said 30 years ago!!!  Smh 

Also, who ever said anything about Gender?!  You sound as bad as the people who said I voted for Obama just because he’s black!  SMH 

 

[ALGAYDO 30,644]

25 minutes ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

I do blame ALL of those people (including Hillary herself) for her obvious mistakes, but I also blame the people who got caught up in her dumb email "scandal" and about stuff she said 30 years ago!!!  Smh 

Also, who ever said anything about Gender?!  You sound as bad as the people who said I voted for Obama just because he’s black!  SMH 

 

Most people who bagged on her for the emails are Republican, so idk why that’s being brought up in regards to us progressives not liking her lol 

and bro, she’s done like a thousand bad things WITHIN the past couple of decades to make any logical person raise their eyebrow. Don’t ignore her past, because it’s indicative of the present/future unless proven otherwise. 

Also, I didn’t say you only voted for her because of her gender, I only brought it up because I kept seeing idiots calling people sexist for not making Hilary the first female president, despite her gender being one of the LAST things to consider about her lol

anyway, I won’t support the “lesser of the two evils” because we should be striving for a GOOD president, not a “well they’re not as bad as the other person!” president.  

[En_Sabah_Nur 9,358]

1 hour ago, ALGAYDO said:

because we should be striving for a GOOD president

"GOOD" to progressives nowadays is to literally be a SAINT, and nobody is that - Smh 

 

[tomsches 17,325]

Serving hippie grandma eleganza 

[ALGAYDO 30,644]

2 hours ago, En_Sabah_Nur said:

"GOOD" to progressives nowadays is to literally be a SAINT, and nobody is that - Smh 

 

Nobody is asking for a saint! Literally nobody is perfect, everyone had flaws! We are looking for someone who isn’t a hypocritical war-mongering elitist! That’s the bare minimum. Not a saint. But a decent, transparent politician that has a track record of putting their constituents first, money last. That’s all that most are asking for. Hilary, unfortunately, does not fit that criteria at all, on all fronts. That’s all we are saying. Nothing malicious. We aren’t looking for miracles, we’re looking for something GOOD. 

[Guillaume Hamon 6,040]

9 hours ago, Vengaboy said:

I mean..if you were invited to the Cannes Film Festival, would you turn it down? 😏

Oh I don't feel the need to walk on a red carpet and will not enjoy the movie more if I see it with showbiz people so it wouldn't be hard. ☺️

And I don't represent something that shouldn't be glamorized like politics so it's super different. I just don't think it's positive to see politicians being star-like. It makes politic seems more trivial and entertwined with entertainment imo.

[Dennis 8,391]

She looks beautiful. Why are people LMAOing this? 

[Dennis 8,391]

49 minutes ago, ALGAYDO said:

Nobody is asking for a saint! Literally nobody is perfect, everyone had flaws! We are looking for someone who isn’t a hypocritical war-mongering elitist! That’s the bare minimum. Not a saint. But a decent, transparent politician that has a track record of putting their constituents first, money last. That’s all that most are asking for. Hilary, unfortunately, does not fit that criteria at all, on all fronts. That’s all we are saying. Nothing malicious. We aren’t looking for miracles, we’re looking for something GOOD. 

Please, enough with the "war-mongering" nonsense.

Literally right now the biggest two countries threatening or waging wars are Russia and China. And yet big part of the left unfortunately (including Democratic Socialists of America, here's their shameful statement) are too quick to make up excuses for them and their military hostilities, and blame american war-mongering.

It's become cheap talk at this point. Those elements of the left don't give a flying **** about peace and imperialism. They only fully condemn it when it's american imperialism. And I think it's time to focus on the real warmongerers waging or threatening a full on invasion of sovereign independent nations. Hillary Clinton isn't doing that. Save your energy for the real ones.

It saddens me that a genuine leftist movement that is constructive, started by Bernie Sanders, is now being hijacked by toxic far leftists who are nothing but apologists for authoritarian regimes around the world, from Venezuela, to China to Russia. If you don't believe me, read that statement I linked. The language is rather shocking (even criticizing the sanctions on Putin ).

[27monster27 11,750]

6 hours ago, Dennis said:

Please, enough with the "war-mongering" nonsense.

Literally right now the biggest two countries threatening or waging wars are Russia and China. And yet big part of the left unfortunately (including Democratic Socialists of America, here's their shameful statement) are too quick to make up excuses for them and their military hostilities, and blame american war-mongering.

It's become cheap talk at this point. Those elements of the left don't give a flying **** about peace and imperialism. They only fully condemn it when it's american imperialism. And I think it's time to focus on the real warmongerers waging or threatening a full on invasion of sovereign independent nations. Hillary Clinton isn't doing that. Save your energy for the real ones.

It saddens me that a genuine leftist movement that is constructive, started by Bernie Sanders, is now being hijacked by toxic far leftists who are nothing but apologists for authoritarian regimes around the world, from Venezuela, to China to Russia. If you don't believe me, read that statement I linked. The language is rather shocking (even criticizing the sanctions on Putin ).

Can we please stop only criticizing the far left and not just the far right? You are aware that this is a key part of right wing rhetoric that damages the left as a whole correct?

I am not saying that you shouldn't criticize the far left, but doing ONLY that while leaving the far right untouched is very bad.