[Nominated] Golden Globes nominations announcement

[NewUsername 11,392]

Just read the whole list, excuse me but where are Sarah Paulson and Beanie Feldstein's nominations???

[ShayCristoforo 10,607]

I mean, she really was the best thing about HoG. Jared Leto was good but also a caricature. 

If she wasn’t in it, it wouldn’t be a good film. Just an okay movie. 

[julz 7,010]

At this point, i really feel that a nom at the Oscars is on lock...which is so awesome 

[r4therupbeat 1,587]

I keep checking the predictions for the Oscars Nomination so this I looking a lot better now.

[Gaby15 13,155]

4 hours ago, Bradley said:

Bradley is not nominated for anything wow. Not for Nightmare Alley or Licorice Pizza.

Gaga is doing so well as an actress tbh.

He was snubbed. As far I read the predictions for various awards, both Mahershala Ali and Ben Affleck were surprises. Somehow I don’t feel the buzz around Bradley at all, despite being in a pretty good place in the predictions. 

[Christopher Rolas 163]

I was thinking that maybe Gaga shouldn't win neither a Golden Globe or an Oscar because HOG wasn't actually that good. I wanted her to win an Oscar for her role in a masterpiece movie like AISB. 

But now after a second thought, this is actually the best scenario for her to win any award for best actress, the fact that the movie isn't actually good gives Gaga more value because she carries the best of the movie and proves she's a valuable and a f*ck*ng good actress. 

[LilyLark 10,097]

5 hours ago, Gaby15 said:

He was snubbed. As far I read the predictions for various awards, both Mahershala Ali and Ben Affleck were surprises. Somehow I don’t feel the buzz around Bradley at all, despite being in a pretty good place in the predictions. 

I'm totally shocked that he keeps getting snubbed....especially as he's sort of low key campaigning.

[Arloway 147]

I was listening to Awards Watch podcast and they predicted that Gaga has almost 0 chance of getting an Oscar nom... even with the GG +CCA nom in hand. They said Gaga is in the same position as JLo in 2019 and Madonna in 1996, in which both did well in precursors but missed the Oscar eventually. 

However I remember them being huge Madonna stans. I personally love Madonna so much but some of her stans are just...unbearable. 

[LilyLark 10,097]

49 minutes ago, Arloway said:

I was listening to Awards Watch podcast and they predicted that Gaga has almost 0 chance of getting an Oscar nom... even with the GG +CCA nom in hand. They said Gaga is in the same position as JLo in 2019 and Madonna in 1996, in which both did well in precursors but missed the Oscar eventually. 

However I remember them being huge Madonna stans. I personally love Madonna so much but some of her stans are just...unbearable. 

Eh, I'd go with Scott Feinberg from THR and Vanity Fair over Awards Watch. I don't think Gaga's a guarantee, but I also think saying she has almost no chance of getting in is a bit ridiculous, too.

[StrawberryBlond 14,827]

Amazing how she keeps going with these nominations. Even if she doesn't win, this is one hell of a portfolio and will help her get more roles as a bankable and credible actress. Not many singers turned actors can say that. If she keeps this up, her future Oscar win could be coming, even if it's not for this movie.

3 hours ago, Arloway said:

I was listening to Awards Watch podcast and they predicted that Gaga has almost 0 chance of getting an Oscar nom... even with the GG +CCA nom in hand. They said Gaga is in the same position as JLo in 2019 and Madonna in 1996, in which both did well in precursors but missed the Oscar eventually. 

However I remember them being huge Madonna stans. I personally love Madonna so much but some of her stans are just...unbearable. 

I don't think they're thinking of it correctly. Both J-Lo and Madonna have never been nominated for an Oscar and both aren't considered good actresses by the majority of people. The academy are very reputation focused with who they nominate and only want credible names getting recognised. If you're famous for being a bad actress most of the time or make your living from frothy rom-coms, you won't be taken seriously, even when you're good, which is why one good performance from these women doesn't undo years of bad press for your acting. Gaga, on the other hand, has been nominated for Best Actress before and won for songwriting (with an additional nomination to boot). She's also performed at the Oscars multiple times now. This is clearly someone who the academy respects and thinks is a valid choice for nomination.

[Arloway 147]

6 hours ago, LilyLark said:

Eh, I'd go with Scott Feinberg from THR and Vanity Fair over Awards Watch. I don't think Gaga's a guarantee, but I also think saying she has almost no chance of getting in is a bit ridiculous, too.

I am curious how will Scott adjust his nomination ranking now, since he previously placed Rachel at NO.1 but she's missing CCA while Alana sneaks in. I personally think if one misses the CCA (where they nominate 6-8 actors) their chance of getting in is slim. 

Also, I think St.Louis Critics Award has a very good record predicting Oscar actress nominations (usually 4/5 or even 5/5 get in). Gaga is in. So far she only misses Chicago and Detroit from what I remember. 

[Arloway 147]

4 hours ago, StrawberryBlond said:

If you're famous for being a bad actress most of the time or make your living from frothy rom-coms, you won't be taken seriously, even when you're good,

So true. It also applies to Jennifer Aniston, Adam Sandler, Cameron Diaz, Jim Carrey and many more. They can bring up great performances (Cake, Uncut Gems, etc) but still miss the Oscars. That's why I'm so confused that so many "award experts" are putting Gaga in this category as well. 

 

4 hours ago, StrawberryBlond said:

Even if she doesn't win, this is one hell of a portfolio and will help her get more roles as a bankable and credible actress.

I really think NYFCC is huge for her. This solidly establishes her status as a prestigious actress. Though she won NBR and CCA for ASIB, there are people questioning whether she can do it well without singing or playing a singer. 

If she wins Oscar BA, she could totally be joining the $10M+ paycheck list

[LilyLark 10,097]

1 hour ago, Arloway said:

I am curious how will Scott adjust his nomination ranking now, since he previously placed Rachel at NO.1 but she's missing CCA while Alana sneaks in. I personally think if one misses the CCA (where they nominate 6-8 actors) their chance of getting in is slim. 

Also, I think St.Louis Critics Award has a very good record predicting Oscar actress nominations (usually 4/5 or even 5/5 get in). Gaga is in. So far she only misses Chicago and Detroit from what I remember. 

Rachel and Alana are kind of...in an odd position. Both had good reviews for their performance, but Ariana and Mike received better reviews than Rachel...and while Alana's reviews were solid they were more about how she was 'charming' (e.g. it wasn't a difficult role).

I really believe if they get in it will be due to people responding more to PTA/Spielberg than their actual performances. And in that case, critics are definitely more pro PTA but I feel like SAG/AMPAS voters may lean more towards Spielberg (and Zegler). Alana is giving me Vicky Kreips vibes (critics loved her performance, which was arguably a more complex one than Alanas, but she didn't get an Oscar nom).

[Meat 18,962]

10 hours ago, Arloway said:

I was listening to Awards Watch podcast and they predicted that Gaga has almost 0 chance of getting an Oscar nom... even with the GG +CCA nom in hand. They said Gaga is in the same position as JLo in 2019 and Madonna in 1996, in which both did well in precursors but missed the Oscar eventually. 

However I remember them being huge Madonna stans. I personally love Madonna so much but some of her stans are just...unbearable. 

Why are you listening to D list bloggers when we have experts like Scott Feinberg and Clayton Davis from A list publications predicting Gaga to be nominated? 
 

Also, Madonna was literally not nominated for anything except for a Golden globe in the comedy category. She didn’t get even one critics circle nomination. Not even one.

[Meat 18,962]

7 minutes ago, LilyLark said:

Rachel and Alana are kind of...in an odd position. Both had good reviews for their performance, but Ariana and Mike received better reviews than Rachel...and while Alana's reviews were solid they were more about how she was 'charming' (e.g. it wasn't a difficult role).

I really believe if they get in it will be due to people responding more to PTA/Spielberg than their actual performances. And in that case, critics are definitely more pro PTA but I feel like SAG/AMPAS voters may lean more towards Spielberg (and Zegler). Alana is giving me Vicky Kreips vibes (critics loved her performance, which was arguably a more complex one than Alanas, but she didn't get an Oscar nom).

Also, we tend to forget that the SAGs and Oscars are a tad bit populist. I don’t see them voting for a fairly unknown person like Alana Haim over so many glossy names in contention this year. She has the critics by her side but that doesn’t mean anything when it comes to the Oscars.