PunkTheFunk 121,511 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 He has valid points, but at the end of the day, putting Harry Styles on the cover is going to sell magazines. The same can't be said for Billy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
 bionic 37,892 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, elijahfan said: Shouldnât we celebrate the fact weâre now living in a society where people like Harry Styles can do it freely? Wasnât this the whole point of these decades of fights and suffering? Yes we should but Harry is praised for it while Billy etc are still judged for it. Harry gets to take the costume off but for other people it is their lives and people still don't understand and accept it. buy bionic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dojo 19,365 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, PunkTheFunk said: but at the end of the day, putting Harry Styles on the cover is going to sell magazines.  The same can't be said for Billy.  the cinderella movie did push him even more into the spotlight, it was brilliant career move i'd say Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
 bionic 37,892 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 1 minute ago, dojo said:  the cinderella movie did push him even more into the spotlight, it was brilliant career move i'd say i dont know anyone who watched that buy bionic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Heâs just talking about this now? Hasnât this magazine cover been out for a while? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 54,988 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 This is incredibly rude and self-entitled of Billy. If I had shown support and love for a community and they said those things about me I'd be so incredibly hurt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 54,988 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 19 minutes ago, PunkTheFunk said: He has valid points, but at the end of the day, putting Harry Styles on the cover is going to sell magazines. The same can't be said for Billy. I feel like "all he has to do is be white and straight" is incredibly exclusive of supportive allies. Like what did Harry even do wrong? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micmaky 697 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Harry Styles wore a dress like David Bowie did. Itâs a garment that was even worn by Jesus lol. Billy needs to get over it and for all the people acting like Harry was universally praised have been living in a cave. Every right wing idiot from Piers to Candace Owen dug in and criticised him. Itâs a much bigger deal for a supposedly straight pop star to do it than Porter and creates a bigger conversation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
enissa11 2,984 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Glamourpuss said: Billy Porter- who often wears dresses at red carpet events - explained  'I created the conversation [about non-binary fashion] and yet Vogue still put Harry Styles, a straight white man, in a dress on their cover for the first time.  It's great that Billy started the conversation but this is like somebody saying 'I did it first so that means nobody else can'. He should be happy that something he started is catching on. not at all, he's just saying it's a cover about non-binary fashion, you better put someone who's actually queer that knows and lives non-binary fashion instead of you're guy next door straight ally. Mad Architect of Light Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SadBoi808 1,120 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Im sorry is billy porter the gatekeeper of non binary fashion.. So annoying like stfu Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oyster 2,458 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Harry styles is also like 100x more attractive than billy porter and this is the cover of Vogue oopâŠ. And donât tell me that itâs because Harry is white Bc lil nas x would be even hotter. Billy is just pressed and has always been embarrassing  Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelbHawker 6,208 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 Anyone should be able to wear what they want. Thatâs how I interpreted Harryâs Vogue cover. Porter just screams bitter here.. he didnât invent this whole conversation, what a self centered knob. He aided it.  Trying to diminish this because he ainât the one on the cover.. I honestly just roll my eyes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skaxboy 3,491 Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 I can see both sides. I think itâs important to have a flamboyant gay man wear feminine outfits as much as a presumably straight man wear androgynous fashions. Both are breaking barriers but Harry is a household name so it makes sense that they would choose him. No doubt that gay men are trailblazers in fashion but I tend to see Billyâs looks as more costume than Harryâs more subtle neutral looks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 narcissism and ego? hm sounds like it to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 17, 2021 Share Posted October 17, 2021 1 hour ago, Bradley said: I feel like "all he has to do is be white and straight" is incredibly exclusive of supportive allies. Like what did Harry even do wrong? he is white and he's a man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.