flyaway 15,350 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 2 hours ago, PatrickMonster said: Theoretically, this could help reduce climate change Key word in this. It may sound fascinating as everything in the theory. But then doing it in today's world has many other implications. It is definitely not the same Earth that it was 4000 years ago. And very expensive btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CannaeDrive 3,412 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Well, the first actual "Frankenstein" will not be some human-like botched copy after all. This is going to end well, right? Right? "Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimisaMonster 31,073 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Jurassic park was just supposed to be for entertainment purposes...did you not see the movie and learn anything about how it ends for humans? Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan 20,827 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 me introducing my new boyfriend to my parents in 5 years: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas 31,087 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 18 hours ago, SHALLOW said: Very exciting, but where are the dinosaurs? That's probably next on someone's list if this works Hopefully Jurassic Park's mess won't beome a reality Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 They will invent some Frankeinstein, it's gonna be creepy to watch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 17 hours ago, Economy said: Better still it not just an animal thats been dead a long time... it would actually be an animal thats never existed but merely resemble an aninal that once existed So we are God? Stream I am a god - Kanye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhereIsLG7 1,348 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 Can they also revive back the Chromatica Era next year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,410 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 A different perspective: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nemo 4,410 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 16 hours ago, JusKeepBreathin said: Let's do the exact opposite of what mother nature wants. That always helps. "Mother" Nature doesn't "want" anything. You realize it's probably humans that made the mammoth extinct in the first place? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloo911 12,959 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 I'm quaking Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FFXIV WhiteMage 6,309 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 4 hours ago, PartySick said: It already involves human experimentation, really. Making "designer babies" is totally a thing we could do right now if the ethical debate wasn't being had The process of making a "Designer Babies" just barely touch the real core of genome editing. These babies were basically filtered with the existing good genes known to man. The gene editing I'm referring to is the technology to mutate our genes and produce a superior trait. Kind of forced beneficial mutation. Like making our bodies 10x durable, eliminating the oxygen from our biochemical processes, etc. But this will involve a long series of inhumane experiments Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FFXIV WhiteMage 6,309 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 3 hours ago, FfFfFfFF said: I strongly think we should resume at animals.. but who know what kind of experiments happen(ed) behind closed doors already. True, we should test the waters first Though as much as I am enthusiastic to the possible "genome engineering" on human; I don't want to live on that generation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted September 21, 2021 Share Posted September 21, 2021 2 hours ago, Nemo said: "Mother" Nature doesn't "want" anything. You realize it's probably humans that made the mammoth extinct in the first place? We were part of the eco system 10,000 years ago. We aren't now. "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FfFfFfFF 58,060 Posted September 21, 2021 Author Share Posted September 21, 2021 23 hours ago, Forbidden Love said: I mean the idea’s cool and all but I don’t know what they expect to happen. Either they’ll be put in a zoo and die because nobody knows how to take care of an animal that’s been extinct for centuries or they’ll try and throw them out into the wild in ecosystems not equipped to handle the introduction of something that massive and they’ll die of starvation or other environmental factors. Neither are particularly inviting prospects. I don't see the reason why it would be put in a zoo. In the article they cite environmental reasons as to why the company wants to 'revive' it, which is ''they want vitalize the region's grasslands as a major source of carbon sequestration''. If they will be successful, the baby elephants will be sent to reservations in Siberia. Also, ecosystems are ever changing. Mammoths populated most of the Northern Hemisphere before they vanished (due to hunting and climate changing). They don't need to eat this X species in this quantity, they will eat whatever plants they have available. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.