Naked baby from Nirvana album cover sues the band for sexual exploitation

[eddyjeddy 1,711]

 

the judge asking why he recreated the pics and why he got nevermind tattoo’d 

[CautiousLurker 19,470]

26 minutes ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

Is the statue of David p0rn too?

 

Absolutely 

[llemesm 1,581]

I mean, somebody put that baby with the permission of his parents (I hope!), so maybe he should sue his parents for putting him in that position in the first place. 

 

Also reminds me a bit of Scorpions and the cover for their album Virgin Killer, very controversial. In that case the name of the naked girl was never publicly known, and besides the drama around internet, she probably didn't get the chance of complaining about how the picture affected in her life, since she was not a baby. 

 

 

 

[Ariana Grindr 3,173]

21 hours ago, OhHenny2020 said:

 

[dit 46,483]

actually good for them. he should also sue his parents.

Parents need to STOP making big choices like this for their kids. This is a picture that will live on forever without the consent of the kid. 

Adults need to STOP exploiting children just because they cannot express themselves and say NO. 

[BUtterfield 8 41,466]

6 minutes ago, llemesm said:

I mean, somebody put that baby with the permission of his parents (I hope!), so maybe he should sue his parents for putting him in that position in the first place. 

 

Also reminds me a bit of Scorpions and the cover for their album Virgin Killer, very controversial. In that case the name of the naked girl was never publicly known, and besides the drama around internet, she probably didn't get the chance of complaining about how the picture affected in her life, since she was not a baby. 

 

 

 

How was this legal?!

[BUtterfield 8 41,466]

18 hours ago, Oriane said:

In that case, should all babies from ads etc sue too?

I mean we can debate this case considering he has recreated the album over the years but for other cases where a literal baby is being put on display with the consent of his parents then yeah the adult should have the ability sue if they want to since they didn’t have a choice 

[llemesm 1,581]

5 minutes ago, BUtterfield 8 said:

How was this legal?!

I've been asking the same for years. Did no one from the creative team, corporatives, legal department or even the band ever think: hey, is this even legal? 

 

Absolutely crazy.

[Neopet bbq 2 9]

how are some people in here offended. its a naked baby relax.  nothing sexual tf

[Versace 7,979]

The parents would have consent it and if he’s older than 18 sueing is useless, because after time passes from your age of consent, that signals consent to any contracts/agreements you’ve been under as a minor. Seems like a cash grab to me. 

[JusKeepBreathin 19,311]

8 hours ago, llemesm said:

I mean, somebody put that baby with the permission of his parents (I hope!), so maybe he should sue his parents for putting him in that position in the first place. 

 

Also reminds me a bit of Scorpions and the cover for their album Virgin Killer, very controversial. In that case the name of the naked girl was never publicly known, and besides the drama around internet, she probably didn't get the chance of complaining about how the picture affected in her life, since she was not a baby. 

 

 

 

But it is a naked girl in a suggestive position. 

Day and night difference.