Jump to content
celeb

James Franco to Pay $2.2M to Settle Sexual Misconduct Suit


Teletubby

Featured Posts

Teletubby

James Franco has agreed to pay $2,235,000 to resolve a lawsuit alleging he pushed acting students into performing in increasingly explicit sex scenes on camera. 
The proposed deal is being put to a Los Angeles judge for approval.

Two former students in Franco’s acting class, led the lawsuit back in Oct. 2020. The complaint alleged that those who were taught by Franco at Studio 4 Film School in New York and Los Angeles were the victims of fraud.

Tither-Kaplan is getting $670,500 minus $223,500 less in fees going to the lawyers.
Gaal will get $223,500 minus $74,500 to the lawyers.
And the other students would get almost two-thirds of the remaining pot of $1.341 million with the lawyers total take being around $827,000.

The settlement will require Tither-Kaplan and Gaal to release claims with the other students releasing fraud claims against the star actor.

source

"You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy
Link to post
Share on other sites

godnhat

Hollywood at its finest. Will the progressive left ruin his career with boycotts and blacklists or will he be "protected"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

GagaSine

What a dumbass.

3 minutes ago, godnhat said:

Hollywood at its finest. Will the progressive left ruin his career with boycotts and blacklists or will he be "protected"?

If you think actual real leftists give af about rich hollywood douchebags, you're absolutely delusional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jill
Just now, godnhat said:

Hollywood at its finest. Will the progressive left ruin his career with boycotts and blacklists or will he be "protected"?

What? You guys complain when we cancel someone and complain when we don't lol

Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
1 minute ago, Jill said:

What? You guys complain when we cancel someone and complain when we don't lol

Whose "u guys". How do u know this user complains about both?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jill
Just now, Economy said:

Whose "u guys". How do u know this user complains about both?

Because they're implying "the left" won't cancel James Franco because he's famous or something? I don't understand what the left or cancellation has to do with this post but whatever

Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
Link to post
Share on other sites

River
30 minutes ago, Jill said:

Because they're implying "the left" won't cancel James Franco because he's famous or something? I don't understand what the left or cancellation has to do with this post but whatever

I think they mean the progressive left in hollywood.. the actor guild is very protective to each other after all, it took them years of silence to cancel Harvey and come out with the truth and even then some of his friends who's supposed to be progressive left, like Meryl Streep, kept the word of silence, up until everything was out.

None of them are talking against James Franco and helping these girls basically.. in a few months he will come back to work like nothing has happened.

 

So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

GagaSine
4 minutes ago, River said:

I think they mean the progressive left in hollywood.. the actor guild is very protective to each other after all, it took them years of silence to cancel Harvey and come out with the truth and even then some of his friends who's supposed to be progressive left, like Meryl Streep, kept the word of silence, up until everything was out.

None of them are talking against James Franco and helping these girls basically.. in a few months he will come back to work like nothing has happened.

 

I don't think any of those people are actually leftists though. Hiding abuse is not a leftist value. Call them progressives, sure, because American politics in Hollywood and overall are so right wing slanted, but I would hardly consider Meryl Streep or the screen actors guild "leftist". They are self interested centrists/liberals at best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick

I don't understand how things like this are allowed to be simple civil suits. Criminal trials should be had :rip:

You're stinky
Link to post
Share on other sites

godnhat
50 minutes ago, Jill said:

Because they're implying "the left" won't cancel James Franco because he's famous or something? I don't understand what the left or cancellation has to do with this post but whatever

Apologies for not having been clear, I meant the progressive left in Hollywood. I always think that any celebrity who claims they didn't know about Harvey Weinstein is an absolute liar. They ALL KNEW, and everyone shut up about it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CautiousLurker

The lawyers are getting more than half of that money :bear:

It's a joke! When you give me that look, it's a joke!
Link to post
Share on other sites

HardlyaSaint
36 minutes ago, River said:

I think they mean the progressive left in hollywood.. the actor guild is very protective to each other after all, it took them years of silence to cancel Harvey and come out with the truth and even then some of his friends who's supposed to be progressive left, like Meryl Streep, kept the word of silence, up until everything was out.

None of them are talking against James Franco and helping these girls basically.. in a few months he will come back to work like nothing has happened.

 

Even Seth Rogen himself has come out and said he will not work with Franco again I doubt he’ll have a sustainable career to go back to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
2 hours ago, Jill said:

Because they're implying "the left" won't cancel James Franco because he's famous or something? I don't understand what the left or cancellation has to do with this post but whatever

U didnt answer my question...

 

U said ppl complain either way about the left. Im saying does this user complain both ways? Cuz if not what other ppl complain about isnt relative to him 

 

PS: i agree with u btw 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
2 hours ago, PartySick said:

I don't understand how things like this are allowed to be simple civil suits. Criminal trials should be had :rip:

Are they allowed to press criminal charges in this case?

 

If so then i guess the lawsuit was by choice and they prefer money?

 

I dont know if its the case in this partocular situation cuz i dont know the law very well in this case so im gonna generalize here... 

 

But ive noticed quite a few ppl when they are wronged in some way, if they get more than 1 legal option on how to respond they will still select the option that puts more personal profit ahead of them than the option that is more focused on justice. Its a choice, but i find it kinda sad thats where we are as a society :deadbanana:

 

Like in cases where a profitable lawsuit is an option over charges... ppl will often take the lawsuit :enigma:

 

And the sad thing is... i probably would too depending on the situation. But i never claimed to be morally perfect :messga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...