Khloe Kardashian is a hypocrite

[Teletubby 148,938]

Khloe Kardashian shamed followers for using water bottles, talked about limiting single usage of plastics and reducing pollution this month 

but decided that all this plastic that she got for the birthday today and cut flowers that are also disaster for the environment are worth to share

if she really cared about the environment she would ask her friends to donate to some pro-environmental foundations instead of wasting money on plastic that will be thrown out in few days

[BUtterfield 8 41,385]

Ap

 

[Living 1,583]

4 minutes ago, BUtterfield 8 said:

Ap

 

These photos are from today, she has done it again 

[Lucas 26,828]

Ironic coming from a woman/family travelling on private jets and whose businesses are probably polluting like crazy

[LaLuna 12,732]

I can't stand when rich people try to act all righteous when they're no better than the rest of us.

Also, being environmentally conscious is not even an option anymore, it's a collective responsibility. Our future depends on it.

[hELXIG 42,966]

Their private jets, their extravagant parties with tonnes of waste, their mansions with all the lighting and electricity and water going all the damn day and night. She's rich enough to make a difference and she doesn't, yet she's out here shaming poorer people for their water bottles? I understand the sentiment, single use bottles are terrible, but god have some perspective   so entitled

I'd be interested to know if her mansion has solar panels, renewable energy sources, a multi-use water system, if she uses all biodegradable cleaning products, if she chooses to support brands that are eco friendly, if any of her waste is recyclable, what the carbon footprint of her and her family's businesses looks like etc.

[CyanDante 6,072]

Agreed with the hypocrisy, but how is cutting flowers a "disaster" fot the environment? 

[alsemanche 93,673]

Rich people doing fake "activism" for popularity while doing the exact opposite in their lives? Nothing new 

[Teletubby 148,938]

3 minutes ago, CyanDante said:

Agreed with the hypocrisy, but how is cutting flowers a "disaster" fot the environment? 

The floriculture industry, has huge impacts on the environment through water usage, pollution, land degradation, and fossil fuel transportation emissions. Some estimates account that one hectare of a flower farm consumes over 900 cubic meters of water per month. source


Flowers can generate serious carbon emissions because of refrigeration and long-haul transport. Stems may be transported up to 6,000 miles in refrigerated airplane holds. In 2018, Valentine’s Day flowers grown in Colombia and flown to US airports produced some 360,000 metric tons of CO2, according to estimates by the International Council on Clean Transportation. To put that into perspective, that’s roughly equivalent to 78,000 cars driven for one year. source

[CyanDante 6,072]

14 minutes ago, Lady Ava Gaga Max said:

The floriculture industry, has huge impacts on the environment through water usage, pollution, land degradation, and fossil fuel transportation emissions. Some estimates account that one hectare of a flower farm consumes over 900 cubic meters of water per month. source


Flowers can generate serious carbon emissions because of refrigeration and long-haul transport. Stems may be transported up to 6,000 miles in refrigerated airplane holds. In 2018, Valentine’s Day flowers grown in Colombia and flown to US airports produced some 360,000 metric tons of CO2, according to estimates by the International Council on Clean Transportation. To put that into perspective, that’s roughly equivalent to 78,000 cars driven for one year. source

So it's not literal cutting flowers  , but more so the industry, how it is farmed, kept and transported. 

[GagaSine 7,464]

31 minutes ago, CyanDante said:

So it's not literal cutting flowers  , but more so the industry, how it is farmed, kept and transported. 

You're just playing semantics, the point is the demand for cut flowers is environmentally destructive.