CameronSpears 2,129 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 Good. Sorry but I don't care about some people losing jobs when it's going to destroy our planet and ruin more lives than that. Get a different job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JusKeepBreathin 19,311 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 4 hours ago, HuffsAhoy said: I only support this if the government is going to pay for the education and training these people need to transition into their new careers. Not sure how some of the dems expect folks who have been coal miners all their life, for example, to be able to function in a job outside of that That's already in place since Obama. The problem is retraining resistance. Like when coal miners refuse retraining. "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,847 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 7 hours ago, PartySick said: I never understood the push for electric cars before moving our electric grid itself away from fossil fuels. Like, good for you, you drive a hybrid. I assume you charged your car at home? Where the electricity is made using fossil fuels? U know what i used to say the same thing that it didnt help if the energy wasnt green and u should emphasize the grid first then the cars But then i realized that since change and transitions take so many years (and a car can last 15+ years on the road) if u wait until the grid is mostly green to start vehicle transition ur gonna take a long time to go green on both I do still think the electric grid needs more emphasis than vehicles because the electric grid ends up affecting emissions from both ends but even so it doesnt hurt to start transition on cars also so that when grid is more green so is the vehicle fleet... Otherwise we change the grid this decade and only focus on cars later that means transportatiom wouldnt be green till past 2040 tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsemanche 97,799 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 6 hours ago, FreeBritney said: Good. Sorry but I don't care about some people losing jobs when it's going to destroy our planet and ruin more lives than that. Get a different job. You wouldn't be saying that if you were the one losing your only source of income. OT: This makes sense. They should provide them with alternatives, including free education and training for those who need them for new jobs. Switching to environmentally friendly industries is crucial, and so is keeping the jobs of people who will be affected. Soft, soothing, and succulent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuffsAhoy 7,433 Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 8 hours ago, JusKeepBreathin said: That's already in place since Obama. The problem is retraining resistance. Like when coal miners refuse retraining. Thanks for the info. I had no idea it has been attempted before and (apparently) failed Here is hoping this go-around will be more successful You remind me that it's such a wonderful thing to love. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woolfsmck 2,763 Posted April 24, 2021 Author Share Posted April 24, 2021 18 hours ago, Economy said: Theres different ways they could go about it. My point is just that the idea that their jobs should be replaced with green energy jobs specifically is people oversimplifying things and not taking logistics into account as usual For the reasons i mentioned it wouldnt be that simple in the majority of cases and communities But i definitely support other ways to help them! Good 👉 like a cat in a sil, I observe life, moving and still. My words give a clue,look inside to see whats true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.