Cookie Tookie 10,546 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 Omg he was rude, let’s cancel him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freebit 6,240 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 46 minutes ago, Quartz said: How was the message written? Is this really an issue. From the article: A week later, Bilson checked her Instagram DMs and was surprised to find a message there from Malek. "But it wasn't like, 'Hey! How are you?' It was straight to 'I would really appreciate it if you take that down, I'm a really private person,'" she said. "I was like, 'Oh s---, okay.' I get like really hot, I like start sweating, and I get all nervous." I personally think he was doing the most over the least. Everyone thought the pic was cute. If this is how he was during Oscar season I don't think he's cut out to become a bigger star tbh. For example, I can't imagine someone like Tom Hanks getting bent out of shape over someone posting an old pic from high school. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 3 minutes ago, Oriane said: It's not a question of being sensitive of what others think about them. If a photo of me is taken, whatever it is, I expect it to stay in private spheres, not be posted publicly if I didn't agree to it beforehand. Then LEAKED pictures of House of Gaga thread should closed in your opinion? They are posting pictures of the cast even when they're not shooting which would qualify as a personal invasion and yet we all are yassing to the pictures. Double standard right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, Cookie Tookie said: Omg he was rude, let’s cancel him Who's cancelling him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 minute ago, Aphasic Top said: People are Yassing when she does it but all of a sudden everyone is very woke to privacy. How many times has a member posted paparazzi pictures of Gaga and others artists without their consent? C'mon let's not be hypocritical. Like I said I don’t know situations of Beyoncé. You brought up Beyoncé. We’re talking about Rami amd Rachel. The point here is that Rami said he didn’t like it. Have we had a situation were Gaga didn’t like a member posting a picture in this site. Can you post a quote of Gaga saying “I don’t like a member of Gaga daily posting paparazzi pictures of me”. It’s hypocritical from Rachel, because like I quoted her, she asked for privacy for pictures of her baby, but when Rami asks for his privacy it’s rude? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 Just now, damag said: Like I said I don’t know situations of Beyoncé. You brought up Beyoncé. We’re talking about Rami amd Rachel. The point here is that Rami said he didn’t like it. Have we had a situation were Gaga didn’t like a member posting a picture in this site. Can you post a quote of Gaga saying “I don’t like a member of Gaga daily posting paparazzi pictures of me”. It’s hypocritical from Rachel, because like I quoted her, she asked for privacy for pictures of her baby, but when Rami asks for his privacy it’s rude? Way to turn things around. We constantly post throwback pictures of Gaga and other artists without their consent. Period. We even post pictures of Gaga when she clearly doesn't want her photos taken. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gag 22,449 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 54 minutes ago, Aphasic Top said: According to Rachel, she was told that it wasn't good for his image as he was nominated for an Oscar and wanted to be taken seriously. He should worry about the fact that his Oscar movie was directed by a notorious pedophile rapist. That seems more damning to his “image” than this random photo. headspin, happiness, DE̤̣A̢̯͔̘T͏͙̗̟̫H̗̙͡ͅ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 Just now, gag said: He should worry about the fact that his Oscar movie directed by a notorious pedophile rapist. That seems more damning to his “image” than this random photo. Thanks and totally agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 10 minutes ago, Aphasic Top said: Then LEAKED pictures of House of Gaga thread should closed in your opinion? They are posting pictures of the cast even when they're not shooting which would qualify as a personal invasion and yet we all are yassing to the pictures. Double standard right? You don’t make sense. I get what you say about someone posting a picture of someone else. But it’s different from that someone else asking you to take it down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 3 minutes ago, Aphasic Top said: Way to turn things around. We constantly post throwback pictures of Gaga and other artists without their consent. Period. We even post pictures of Gaga when she clearly doesn't want her photos taken. It’s not turning things around. It’s just that your argument doesn’t fit the situation with Rami and Rachel. Rami is asking her to take it down. I’ve never heard of any artist asking a member of Gaga daily to take a picture down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 Just now, damag said: You don’t make sense. I get what you say about someone posting a picture of someone else. But it’s different from that someone else asking you to take it down. And you don't get it. Gaga covering her face is a clear way of asking for privacy yet members on here have posted pictures of her like that many times over. Consent is verbal, physical and legally also written. Again, Gaga covering her face means I don't want you to take my picture. So c'mon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 3 minutes ago, Aphasic Top said: And you don't get it. Gaga covering her face is a clear way of asking for privacy yet members on here have posted pictures of her like that many times over. Consent is verbal, physical and legally also written. Again, Gaga covering her face means I don't want you to take my picture. So c'mon. I do get it. But the situation we are talking about in here is Rachel and Rami, no one else. What does anything of that situation has to do with Gaga, Beyoncé and others. Now if you open a topic for discussion of people posting pictures of other celebrities, all those things you brought up about Gaga and Beyoncé would fit the topic of conversation. It will be within the scope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphasic 4,033 Posted March 30, 2021 Author Share Posted March 30, 2021 Just now, damag said: It’s not turning things around. It’s just that your argument doesn’t fit the situation with Rami and Rachel. Rami is asking her to take it down. I’ve never heard of any artist asking a member of Gaga daily to take a picture down. On the contrary it. He's smiling in the picture, they're outside of a building, he's not portrayed in bad way in the picture, he looks good in the picture and they were friends. She didn't post a picture of a random person to "risk" his/her privacy. It's a perfectly innocent picture of 2 friends. You continue to try to make something out of nothing. I didn't post the article to cancel him or anything, just to show how fame can change people for the worse. You may continue with your argument which you have the right to defend but my point has been made and won't reply to you. I ask you to respect my personal decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKANK 14,288 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 The irony of people in this thread saying Rami Malek currently looks like a “coked out emo psycho,” while also suggesting it’s ridiculous for him to be sensitive about how he looks/looked. I wonder why he might not want unflattering photos of himself released.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted March 30, 2021 Share Posted March 30, 2021 1 minute ago, Aphasic Top said: On the contrary it. He's smiling in the picture, they're outside of a building, he's not portrayed in bad way in the picture, he looks good in the picture and they were friends. She didn't post a picture of a random person to "risk" his/her privacy. It's a perfectly innocent picture of 2 friends. You continue to try to make something out of nothing. I didn't post the article to cancel him or anything, just to show how fame can change people for the worse. You may continue with your argument which you have the right to defend but my point has been made and won't reply to you. I ask you to respect my personal decision. I don’t mind if you don’t reply, that’s fine with me ( just shows that you don’t have a base for your argument). In here your saying what you think of what is portrayed. But you don’t know what and if he was going through something in that picture, what if it triggered a bad memory or something. Remember that some people might smile on the outside but might be calling for help in the inside. I’m not saying that the case here, but might be a possibility. He asked for her to take it down. If she said they’re friends why would she bring this up and try to make something out of “can you take my picture down”. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.