Jump to content
Poster
press

Chromatica: Reviews Thread


Anveeroy

Featured Posts

Queen Bitch
1 minute ago, Doot said:

Are y'all really going to have a meltdown every time someone doesn't share the same opinion of the album as you? :billie:

Yes:billie:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Shadow

We can get over reviews like these. It wasn't that bad. Can't win over everyone. That's life on Earth.

Knowing your own darkness is the best method for dealing with the darknesses of other people. -Carl Jung
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haldy

Slant in the early-2010's were totally fair to Gaga, in my oppinion. But the tone within the reviews has really shifted. Reading the Chromatica review, you can tell there's vitorol to it, which makes it a deeply uncomfortable and bias read.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aarghya said:

:cryga:

I caught that edit. The reviews he gave in 2011 and 2013 are completely irrelevant to his current review. The bad taste of Gaga reaching career milestones after 2013 was clearly too bitter to handle and it shows in the way he basically cried over his keyboard while coming up with his review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr S
11 minutes ago, Aarghya said:

I'm not defending Slant Magazine, but you all needs to first check the previous scores and create the hypothesis. Later we will look like clowns :triggered:

To be fair, those reviews are still littered with passive aggressiveness and digs. There is still a bias that shows throughuot each review, even if he gave an 80 to Born This Way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anveeroy
1 minute ago, honk said:

I caught that edit. The reviews he gave in 2011 and 2013 are completely irrelevant to his current review. The bad taste of Gaga reaching career milestones after 2013 was clearly too bitter to handle and it shows in the way he basically cried over his keyboard while coming up with his review.

Yes, later I re-read your statement and changed back. 

Stream Kylie-Janet Discographies!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr S

Also, I thought Metacritic adjusts the scores based on weight. Which is something can have all 70s, but still average out to 75.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ofc reviews are subjective but to say "Gaga’s approach to pop music has always been less than innovative" teeters on the edge of wanting to pass something off as objective. "Less than innovative" according to ??? A Madonna stan who will stop at nothing to piss on the only real contender to her "throne"? Please. :rip:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anveeroy

METASCORE: 79 (=)

1) The AV Club - 75/100 - Positive 

2) Clash Music - 80/100 - Positive 

3) musicOMH.com - 80/100 - Positive 

4) The Independent (UK) - 80/100 - Positive 

5) The Telegraph (UK) - 80/100 - Positive 

6) NME - 80/100 - Positive 

7) The Guardian - 80/100 - Positive 

8) PopMatters - 70/100 - Positive 

9) Sputnikmusic - 60/100 - Mixed 

10) Slant Magazine - 50/100 - Mixed 

11) Variety - 96/100 - Positive 

NEW: 12) Exclaim - 80/100 - Positive

https://www.metacritic.com/music/chromatica/lady-gaga

Stream Kylie-Janet Discographies!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Naufri

I don’t think slant have anything in particular against Gaga, but if you look their reviews for highly anticipated products they tend to be pretty harsh looking for clickbait. This is extremely obvious in their video game reviews.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anveeroy
10 minutes ago, Mr S said:

Also, I thought Metacritic adjusts the scores based on weight. Which is something can have all 70s, but still average out to 75.

We got another 80. 

Stream Kylie-Janet Discographies!
Link to post
Share on other sites

They've slated 6 tracks out of 16 and given it 8/10 overall ? Not a hanging offence.

Reviews seen to be good generally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jase unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...