Harmonic cancer treatment

[ice bear 1]

so far in the thread they've been frequencies of turmoil

i do think they have benefit though

water cristalizes in beautiful patterns when stimulated with complex melodies, plants grow stronger and healthier with music

and we are 70% water, our energy digestion is still based on photosynthesis like plants (through glucose) 

sounds are known to create nausea, euphoria, fear, relief

so why not?

however a cancer is too material of a problem and too general of a term to be cured with one single wavelength therapy

but harm they won't do

[Nino 12]

1 minute ago, ice bear said:

and we are 70% water, our energy digestion is still based on photosynthesis like plants

Photosynthesis creates glucose which is then broken down, we ingest glucose to break it down. 

2 minutes ago, ice bear said:

but harm they won't do

If people delay proper treatment, it can absolutely do harm.

 

[Woolfsmck 2,763]

Its clear that some posters are using this site as a political forum and view 'any' post that doesn't follow 'their' views as some kind of atrack...

This is Narcissisim....

As far as my original post, I don't know enough about medacin to validate or discount its validity.

Nothing about harmonic cell disruption is right wing or political...

so whatever.

[ice bear 1]

8 minutes ago, Nino said:

Photosynthesis creates glucose which is then broken down, we ingest glucose to break it down. 

You're right, sorry, i meant to say it branches from photosynthesis, since it evolved from that with the mitochondria becoming a dependent organelle

8 minutes ago, Nino said:

f people delay proper treatment, it can absolutely do harm.

i'm not advocating for the usage i'm saying if a person gets the right treatment and decides to make use of them for the unverified benefit or placebo effect as a plus it's ok because "in despair there are no atheists"

[Nino 12]

Just now, ice bear said:

You're right, sorry, i meant to say it branches from photosynthesis, since it evolved from that with the mitochondria becoming a dependent organelle

i'm not advocating for the usage i'm saying if a person gets the right treatment and decides to make use of them for the unverified benefit or placebo effect it's ok because "in despair there are no atheists"

Chloroplasts but you're on the right track there.

Fully agree, whatever helps people cope. 

[ice bear 1]

2 minutes ago, Nino said:

Chloroplasts but you're on the right track there.

i'm literally an arts major, stereotype and all 

[Nino 12]

2 minutes ago, ice bear said:

i'm literally an arts major, stereotype and all 

You know a lot more than people who claim to be educated in biology though, dont worry about it 

[Horny Chicken 10,971]

12 minutes ago, Nino said:

You know a lot more than people who claim to be educated in biology though, dont worry about it 

The OP claims their comments were made by a hacker, but why does the hacker have the same writing style and grammatical structure? 

[Girrr 1,086]

This thread is an absolute mess. I agree that misinformation should not be spread, and this thread should probably be locked if the OP or their hacker can’t respond civilly. This isn’t a political discussion, it’s scientific. @Nino seems to be the voice of logic and reason here