SL is not on LG6

[Mus 7,883]

30 minutes ago, funkmedowntown said:

So maybe we are hyping ourselves over something that was never really coming?

As always

[funkmedowntown 1,163]

1 minute ago, Illuminati Freak said:

Her team has done nothing which is the most telling in this whole scenario. I don't think they care about the leak because it has nothing to do with LG6. And if it does it's not the lead single and has probably been completely reworked if it ended up on the album so they don't care about a year old demo it's not affecting the LG6 roll out. If it was they already would have done damage control. bobby doesn't mess around when it comes to sh*t like that. 

I agree I don’t think they’d let this happen. It is 2020, I am sure that LG6 is under the tightest security Interscope can offer. 

 

1 minute ago, M Monstre said:

That's interesting.

I guess though that the point I'm trying to get across is the argument that, "Well, you're not allowed to spread these snippets/leaks around anyway, so of course they're going to take it down" is faulty. I'm not saying that they don't have the right to take them down. They obviously 100% do. It's their property. That said, if that were the case, I feel like that would've happened to almost every leak that got out there, whether it was a demo, or it was old, etc. 

 

I’m just curious, how do you think SL got out if it is in fact on LG6? I imagine only a few select people have access to the album, and it actually wouldn’t be too hard to nail down who leaked it, based on the fact that just not that many people have their hands in the pot. It has to be under lock and key 24/7. Right? 

[AVeryGagaHolyDick 26,148]

I'm still pretty sure it's the lead single. It's clearly "recent" and there's no way it would leak like this if it wasn't sent to many people who are supposed to play it.

AND Interscope is clearly trying to find the person who leaked it. They did not do that to IWBWY. Some older stuff gets taken down, but it happens virtually, it's not someone who take them down.

Edit: also, Asiel's meltdown on Instagram means a lot

[Floppy 7,951]

2 minutes ago, funkmedowntown said:

So you think that it is on the album based on that she was listening to it in October? Do you have any other reason to believe that that hasn’t been disproved? 

Possibly LG6 but possibly not... 

 

I'm just trying to use deductive reasoning but no one knows for sure. This kind of reminds me when Gaga played ARTPOP in its demo stages for fans while signing autographs. 

[Morphine Prince 106,761]

 

[REALITY 77,427]

1 minute ago, funkmedowntown said:

I’m just curious, how do you think SL got out if it is in fact on LG6? I imagine only a few select people have access to the album, and it actually wouldn’t be too hard to nail down who leaked it, based on the fact that just not that many people have their hands in the pot. It has to be under lock and key 24/7. Right? 

I mean, it's not like this is the first time one of her singles (in fact, one of her lead singles)  got leaked before release. Whether SL is actually the lead single is a different discussion. Personally, I think it is, but my belief in that isn't headstrong; I could see it being just another song on LG6. 

All these leaks start off with a few people having access to it, and then it spiraling out of control to where now it's being played on the radio, in clubs, etc. 

If Stupid Love is not the lead, or if it's not on LG6 for that matter, Gaga and her team/Interscope need to clear that up ASAP.

[AVeryGagaHolyDick 26,148]

It feels like they want us to doubt, to surprise us with the announcement

[Ronnie 6,035]

Maybe they are using this to gauge how people will react to a certain style or sound. Like a research single, in a way. It's weird that they haven't acknowledged it. Who knows. All that matters is that we got new music and it's a BOP.

[LGMonster95 13,704]

8 minutes ago, M Monstre said:

That's interesting.

I guess though that the point I'm trying to get across is the argument that, "Well, you're not allowed to spread these snippets/leaks around anyway, so of course they're going to take it down" is faulty. I'm not saying that they don't have the right to take them down. They obviously 100% do. It's their property. That said, if that were the case, I feel like that would've happened to almost every leak that got out there, whether it was a demo, or it was old, etc. 

 

The thing is that her label removing the leaks doesn't give away any certain clue about it being the lead

[REALITY 77,427]

Just now, LGMonster95 said:

The thing is that her label removing the leaks doesn't give away any certain clue about it being the lead

I think it could be the lead, but I'm also not married to that idea. I also think it could just be another song on LG6. One thing I am certain of though is that this is related to LG6. Whether this song will even ultimately make the cut is something only Gaga and her team know. 

[funkmedowntown 1,163]

12 minutes ago, KEVIN STEVE said:

I'm still pretty sure it's the lead single. It's clearly "recent" and there's no way it would leak like this if it wasn't sent to many people who are supposed to play it.

AND Interscope is clearly trying to find the person who leaked it. They did not do that to IWBWY. Some older stuff gets taken down, but it happens virtually, it's not someone who take them down.

Edit: also, Asiel's meltdown on Instagram means a lot

Can you link the meltdown? 

[Damon 10,904]

40 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

It wasn't, apparently it was just a weird caching mechanism.

 

39 minutes ago, funkmedowntown said:

I heard this was because, if you search it on Gaga’s site or in the code, it automatically saves somewhere in the code itself... idk I don’t know that much about code 

system engineer here, that's not how web sites work

 I didn't believe it was real, that code is easy to edit and take a snapshot, but then I searched myself and found it, the only way we all could see it is bc the web developers who has control over the source code typed it themselves

[REALITY 77,427]

14 minutes ago, KEVIN STEVE said:

I'm still pretty sure it's the lead single. It's clearly "recent" and there's no way it would leak like this if it wasn't sent to many people who are supposed to play it.

AND Interscope is clearly trying to find the person who leaked it. They did not do that to IWBWY. Some older stuff gets taken down, but it happens virtually, it's not someone who take them down.

Edit: also, Asiel's meltdown on Instagram means a lot

I totally forgot about this! Yeah, that's potentially a big indicator that this is at least  LG6 related as well!

[AVeryGagaHolyDick 26,148]

Just now, funkmedowntown said:

Can you link the meltdown? 

Whoooooh that was like 300+ pages ago in the LG6 Discussion thread 

Basically, a fan posted that they loved the leaked snippet or something, and Asiel took the comments to say that it was really disrepecful towards Gaga to listen to these leaks etc. The fan had the nerve to reply "do you want the link?"  

[michael angelo 1,087]

Gaga’s silence means a lot, at least to me. If this was all a lie I think her team/her would’ve say something. She said this album is going to be a surprise drop so I don’t expect her to go on Instagram and announce something to drop a week later. I think that she’s going to announce and drop it in the same second ahah