LilMonst3r 5,688 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 The SNL skit will have me dying, this already had me rolling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma 7,182 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Can we focus on “destroying” republicans instead of pitting democrats against each other... jeez Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALGAYDO 35,220 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 7 hours ago, Enigma said: Can we focus on “destroying” republicans instead of pitting democrats against each other... jeez Can we focus on nominating the best candidate first by having debates against one another, and then focus on the republicans? Jeez. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibraLove 1,281 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 13 hours ago, Ziggy said: Also worth noting that he didn’t have to beat republican incumbents because he’s held office for awhile lolol *he* was the incumbent many times lolol it’s such an odd argument to make because it just shines a light on the fact that he’s been here for ages He literally HAD to beat a Republican incumbent to enter Congress. WTH are you even trying to say. If you beat a Republican incumbent in the last thirty years, you have beat a Republican incumbent in the last thirty years. Being in Congress "for ages" is literally irrelevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibraLove 1,281 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 16 hours ago, Florin said: A : 2020 is the start of the new decade. B : No. 2021 is. This is the kind of discussion we are having. 2020-1990 = 30. At best an honest mistake. Her message remains intact and was understood by many people. If you dont want to get it, that's your choice. Ya'll are trying really hard here to obfuscate in her defense. She said last thirty years. Last thirty years goes to 1990. Sanders defeated a Republican incumbent in 1990. Shut up and go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueenEnthusiast 937 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Bernie's policies are inherently feminist. Free healthcare is feminist. Free education is feminist. Not letting our military go across the world into other countries and did what they did in Iraq is feminist. All of his policies are inherently feminist. This man has PREACHED since the civil rights movement about not only equality but EQUITY. Y'all need to stop with the Sanders hate. Wasn't Warren the same person who mentioned she was like part native American to gain some sort of points? You believe her? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henri Bardot 3,990 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Warren is a joke. SHE ISNT GOINT TO WIN AGAINST TRUMP. Lets face it lmao pooiota Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilmonzter 2,864 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Much ado about nothing to quote Shakespeare She is clearly lying. She has staged these kind of things previously she's trying it out now. The friends not foes trial hasn't workedout well for Liz. So she and her campaign is on the offensive. But I don't see any redemption for her after this fiasco for her. Sing C'est la vie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 4 hours ago, ALGAYDO said: Can we focus on nominating the best candidate first by having debates against one another, and then focus on the republicans? Jeez. That’s what primaries are for. People will decide the issues the feel are the most important to them and the person they are the most comfortable with in the position to make those issues a priority. Meanwhile, everyone of them is going to be a politician. Iowa is looking to be in play for Biden. That’s probably why it’s getting cut throat out there for the others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 14,141 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 2 hours ago, LibraLove said: He literally HAD to beat a Republican incumbent to enter Congress. WTH are you even trying to say. If you beat a Republican incumbent in the last thirty years, you have beat a Republican incumbent in the last thirty years. Being in Congress "for ages" is literally irrelevant. No I’m saying that her point is an odd one because, you’re right, he had to do that. The only reason he didn’t have to beat a whole roster of republican incumbents and only the one was because he was in office the rest of the time. So her saying that he hasn’t beaten one in 30 years is itself a weird thing to bring up because he was in office most of that time so it isn’t like there was anyone for him to beat anyway. So no it isn’t irrelevant and I was with you but go feral on an internet someone; do you. Idk why you’re jumping like I punched a dog but cool the aggression. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibraLove 1,281 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Ziggy said: No I’m saying that her point is an odd one because, you’re right, he had to do that. The only reason he didn’t have to beat a whole roster of republican incumbents and only the one was because he was in office the rest of the time. So her saying that he hasn’t beaten one in 30 years is itself a weird thing to bring up because he was in office most of that time so it isn’t like there was anyone for him to beat anyway. So no it isn’t irrelevant and I was with you but go feral on an internet someone; do you. Idk why you’re jumping like I punched a dog but cool the aggression. Nobody's going feral. I'm just tired of people trying to make this seem like she "got 'em" on something that she totally didn't. She was wrong. That's what I thought you were doing like the other user was in this thread. It also seemed like you were taking a dig about him being in congress so long, so that was my misunderstanding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilmonzter 2,864 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Warren really wants to be Biden's VP pick. She had this attack since their meeting and wanted to use it at the correct moment. She's cunning and conniving. Sing C'est la vie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma 7,182 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 10 hours ago, ALGAYDO said: Can we focus on nominating the best candidate first by having debates against one another, and then focus on the republicans? Jeez. Because destroying the reputation of each and every one of them will help them when second turn comes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.