Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/amp There are ranges and varying estimates on the article but some estimates place human contritions to Global Warming at 110% even as high as 134% The reason for the surpassed 100% mark is because natural changes and variations such as aerosols like volcanos that can block some sunlight may have resulted in natural cooling since 1950 meaning it offset some of the global warming and without natural change global warming would actually be worse The lowest estimated put our blame at around 70%. Meaning we would be in a natural period of warming but it would still be only 1/3 the amount without global warming The last warmest period was in medival times where it got as least as warm as the 1990s if not warmer. Of course the change was more gradual Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreu 37,216 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 pretends to be shocked.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
March34th 1,973 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 are we surprised at all? Spoiler well, besides str8 cis-het white men who think climate change is a "natural course of events" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 Just now, March34th said: are we surprised at all? Hide contents well, besides str8 cis-het white men who think climate change is a "natural course of events" What's a cis-het? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimisaMonster 31,073 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 Of course we are...no other species is to blame lol Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, TimisaMonster said: Of course we are...no other species is to blame lol Cows lol Jk we are the ones that breed so many cows to begin with But there's natural variations. By the amount we are responsible for largely is an argument of what the natural change would be right now and if you add it or subtract it to our activities, on a net basis what is our share of the blame By some estimates it seems like it may be over 100% Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pop Music 20,540 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 I'm not surprised at all Pop Music and Lady Gaga forever! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloo911 12,959 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 16 minutes ago, Economy said: What's a cis-het? Cisgender heterosexual OT: Not surprised but I am interested how they came to this conclusion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, Gagaloo92 said: Cisgender heterosexual OT: Not surprised but I am interested how they came to this conclusion Still don't know exactly what that refers to And the conclusion is based on factors they are trying to take in account that occur naturally to see what the natural temperature changes would have been without human activity It's hard to be fully conclusive about it and hard to estimate hence the 79% to 134% big range Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
March34th 1,973 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 19 minutes ago, Economy said: What's a cis-het? cisgender/heterosexual Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 Just now, March34th said: cisgender/heterosexual I'm still lost in what that's refering to lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaplayer315 14,668 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloo911 12,959 Posted December 8, 2019 Share Posted December 8, 2019 8 minutes ago, Economy said: Still don't know exactly what that refers to And the conclusion is based on factors they are trying to take in account that occur naturally to see what the natural temperature changes would have been without human activity It's hard to be fully conclusive about it and hard to estimate hence the 79% to 134% big range Cisgender means your gender aligns with the sex you were assigned at birth (cis=same), i.e., people who aren't trans (ex: born a male and identify as a man) And gotcha. I can imagine it's difficult to figure that out. Interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 Just now, Gagaplayer315 said: 21 minutes ago, TimisaMonster said: Of course we are...no other species is to blame lol Y'all acting like it was obvious that it was over 100% and that our planet was supposed to be cooling right now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted December 8, 2019 Author Share Posted December 8, 2019 Just now, Gagaloo92 said: Cisgender means your gender aligns with the sex you were assigned at birth. i.e., people who aren't trans (born a man and identify as a man) And gotcha. I can imagine it's difficult to figure that out. Interesting. Oh. Ok thanks And on that case that comment was too generalized. Most straight men DO believe in global warming It's the conservative old white men in politics or business world that fight back on the idea (and even in business world many think it's a big issue) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.