Jump to content
politics

Kentucky might actually elect a Democratic Governor


JusKeepBreathin

Featured Posts

JusKeepBreathin

Live results:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2019-general-elections/kentucky-results?icid=election_marquee&cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_ma&fbclid=IwAR0qSPwv8bJwMYQAahB-TflDvcI-6r0JCI470sjR9lvOastmsfIxeoGIq3A

Trump actually campaigned for the Republican incumbent governor last night in Kentucky. 

We might actually see a Democrat win in Kentucky of all places.

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gagz4Gaga

If Kentucky can elect a democratic Governor, maybe they can also kick Turtle Moscow Mitch’s dirty saggy ass out of the senate. :enigma:

nostalgia’s for geeks
Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
9 minutes ago, Gagz4Gaga said:

If Kentucky can elect a democratic Governor, maybe they can also kick Turtle Moscow Mitch’s dirty saggy ass out of the senate. :enigma:

That's really what I'm hoping for. The turtle has to go.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster

Bevin said he "strongly disagreed" with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalizing same-sex marriage, continuing "When the definition of marriage was put on the ballot 10 years ago, 74 percent of Kentuckians made it clear that they supported traditional marriage. :fthis:

Sayonara, BITCH :kiss:

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince

This is cool but you need the context: 

The current GOP governor was widely unpopular due to his stance on Medicaid. 

The Democrat running is also the son of the last governor who is a Democrat who was governor from 2007-2015. 

Don’t get too excited about Dems sweeping elections everywhere in 2020. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
Just now, Morphine Prince said:

This is cool but you need the context: 

The current GOP governor was widely unpopular due to his stance on Medicaid. 

The Democrat running is also the son of the last governor who is a Democrat who was governor from 2007-2015. 

Don’t get too excited about Dems sweeping elections everywhere in 2020. 

 

Yes - still, he had a Trump endorsement and rally support from literally yesterday. Credit's due where credit's due. We all thought Trump had pushed the Midwest further to the right but looks like that may not be entirely true. And defeating an incumbent is an even bigger feat.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
1 minute ago, derpmonster said:

Yes - still, he had a Trump endorsement and rally support from literally yesterday. Credit's due where credit's due. We all thought Trump had pushed the Midwest further to the right but looks like that may not be entirely true. And defeating an incumbent is an even bigger feat.

Yes, by no means am I saying this isn’t amazing. But we need to celebrate with caution. Don’t get too confident. 

(As of right now there is only a 6k difference in votes) 

You also need to look at other GOP candidates across the state which are doing much better. The problem here was clearly the governor. Not so much about Trump or Dems. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
8 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said:

You also need to look at other GOP candidates across the state which are doing much better. The problem here was clearly the governor. Not so much about Trump or Dems. 

I agree mostly but I don't think we can single out the issue to the incumbent governor himself. He was pro-life, socially conservative, all of those things. And it's only densely populated counties that voted for the Democrat. Most counties (since they're sparsely populated) actually voted for the incumbent.

And even if the issue was Medicaid, that raises an interesting dilemma for Republicans. Their platform has been to consistently gut state-provided healthcare. Their voters aren't having it anymore. That's the one issue where Republicans can't spin taking away healthcare in a positive light.

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster

They also flipped Virginia and got the Senate :nooo:

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
1 minute ago, derpmonster said:

I agree mostly but I don't think we can single out the issue to the incumbent governor himself. He was pro-life, socially conservative, all of those things. And it's only densely populated counties that voted for the Democrat. Most counties (since they're sparsely populated) actually voted for the incumbent.

And even if the issue was Medicaid, that raises an interesting dilemma for Republicans. Their platform has been to consistently gut state-provided healthcare. Their voters aren't having it anymore. That's the one issue where Republicans can't spin taking away healthcare in a positive light.

Actually, more counties with small cities and suburbs voted blue this time. 

This shows a shift in the suburbs, which is important to note since these areas can heavily impact a general election (2020). 

Also, Beshear is a popular governor’s son. He had name recognition behind him on top of an unpopular governor. 

For all we know Trump could have boosted Bevin a bit but not enough to win. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

derpmonster
1 minute ago, Morphine Prince said:

Actually, more counties with small cities and suburbs voted blue this time. 

This shows a shift in the suburbs, which is important to note since these areas can heavily impact a general election (2020). 

Also, Beshear is a popular governor’s son. He had name recognition behind him on top of an unpopular governor. 

For all we know Trump could have boosted Bevin a bit but not enough to win. 

Still heavily populated counties overall. Or else how would you explain this map as a victory for Dems?

image.png

Check out iTunes data & graphs at CHARTPOP.live
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
Just now, derpmonster said:

Still heavily populated counties overall. Or else how would you explain this map as a victory for Dems?

image.png

The 2015 map has more red on the east side. I’m just making comparisons to the last election. 

A shift in the suburbs is something that is being observed as a path to victory for Dems in many parts of the country. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...