Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Tulsi Gabbard considering boycotting debate


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

LordEnigma

I think it’s funny how it’s a “we’ll see” situation.

If you are going to make an announcement, just make a decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DeleteMyAccount
16 minutes ago, Maleficent said:

If it is a desperate grab at a headline, then the DNC has nothing to worry about it. If she is true calling the DNC out on rigging, then the media attention will hopefully ensure the problem is corrected before it leads to another 4 years of Trump.

Eh, it is pretty desperate tbh. If she was in the top 5(not even in the top 10 in polls) she wouldn't care. 

I do understand calling out the DNC. But I think she has a lot of other things to make clear for voters. Boycotting is only going to make even more people care less about her. 

Also, the media/Americans aren't going to care about the rigging. If we can't solve Republican voter suppression, fake news about 3 million undocumented people voting in California, etc then the DNC won't change either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

American media needs to be completely washed out and start all over again. News should not be biased, at all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whispering

Good! One less person to take up time!

She doesn’t stand a chance at the nomination anyway. Good riddance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ltlmnstr
1 hour ago, NCgaga said:

American media needs to be completely washed out and start all over again. News should not be biased, at all. 

Then you don’t believe in freedom of the press. A core component of the First Amendment.

It’s why we have The Onion and Clickhole.

It’s your responsibility to vet your sources.
You want news like they do in China? Mass censorship and no dissent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nathantj594

This is why Democrats don’t win anymore. We’re too divided among ourselves to stand a chance. One thing the repuglicans have on us is their unity. While we’re choking each other over nonsense like this, Trump is dancing with the devil and getting away with it. 

And Paula Abdul ain’t got [BLEEP] on me!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Temptation
2 hours ago, nswain1110 said:

Cool Tulsi, bold move - BUT, we still haven't forgotten how you fought to oppress the LGBTQ community. 

Gurl, no she didn’t. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ltlmnstr said:

Then you don’t believe in freedom of the press. A core component of the First Amendment.

It’s why we have The Onion and Clickhole.

It’s your responsibility to vet your sources.
You want news like they do in China? Mass censorship and no dissent?

It has nothing to do with censorship.  I vet what I watch- there are plenty of opinion based programs And podcasts out there that should be biased and geared towards a certain demographic. The news should be the news. It shouldn’t be paid off by political organizations to support certain members. The media highly favored Hillary and disregarded  Bernie and other candidates during the last election. It’s already favoring Biden over Warren and Sanders again. This isn’t about censorship- it’s about the news delivering the news and not getting involved. I’m sorry you did not understand what I was saying but hopefully it’s clearer now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lilmonzter

Good for her going against the establishment! Making some much needed noise against the media bias faced by non establishment candidates like Andrew Yang Bernie Sanders herself etc

Sing C'est la vie 
Link to post
Share on other sites

GAGAVENUS

The idea that they're doing a disservice to the early voting states like Iowa and NH is ridiculous because they already have too much power. As a democrat in a less-important state, it's refreshing to see democratic candidates traveling all over and not just in Iowa, NH, and SC. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...