Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Nancy Pelosi admits she hasn't read the Ukraine transcripts


FABian

Featured Posts

Just now, TheQueenLG said:

NOBODY has read the transcripts, you realize? We read the WH's cliff notes version of the conversation. lol. 

Certainly not what Pelosi was in reference to.

But good job staying in denial.

She literally said it herself that she hasnt read it. Lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, FABian said:

watch and educate yourself

educate and Fox News :lmao:

 

1 minute ago, FABian said:

It's so incredibly naive to disregard a news article based on their affiliations.

ikr :lmao:

 

 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FATCAT said:

Why does it matter that she hasnt read the transcripts? They just got released today. She has more important things on her schedule that she can't just drop to read Trump's "cleaned up" memo.

Maybe it's because shes the one leading the impeachment, and the whole impeachments basis is on the Ukraine transcripts...?

So what grounds does she even have if she hasnt read it herself.

Come on man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheQueenLG
1 minute ago, FABian said:

Certainly not what Pelosi was in reference to.

But good job staying in denial.

She literally said it herself that she hasnt read it. Lol.

Lmao. I'm denying your assertion that there is something wrong with Pelosi not reading the transcripts... The transcripts have not been released. That's quite the standard for our Madam Speaker - to read things that aren't available to her. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FABian said:

It's so incredibly naive to disregard a news article based on their affiliations.

I just dont understand people who chose to make themselves ignorant by choosing to only read from a certain side, and disregard the rest.

 

You wrote this with straight face after commenting on another thread with “lol left leaning article lol!”

:air:

 

The right on this forum is hilarious, but pretty sad most of the time. 

FreePalestine
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, lego said:

WTF is your problem? You always somehow miss how right wing on GGD whines about “leftist media”, when they got no argument, but then they post Fox News. It’s hypocrisy. It’s also typical for “libertarian” to side with the right. 

Most of the people here don’t watch or want to give views to that propaganda channel. He could easily find other source. 

Right wingers on GGD believe leftist media is fake news, but dont believe fox is fake news. They are wrong, but thats not hypocrisy. Do you really expect a right wingers to give Leftist sources? obviously they will source right wing sources just like you would source leftists. If you dont want to give Fox views, search for the news on google, no need to get offended that someone sourced a site you dont like. 

Im a Libertarian and nothing I ever say sides with the right, but even if it did, there is nothing wrong with that. Just because I disagree with you, does not mean I agree with right wingers.

Edit: I think what you are saying is because right ringers say "fake news" when a leftist sources CNN, you should do the same? no, what you should do is comment on the evidence regardless of the source. Unless the source is opinion based with propaganda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin

So what? What is your point? 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, lego said:

 

You wrote this with straight face after commenting on another thread with “lol left leaning article lol!”

:air:

 

The right on this forum is hilarious, but pretty sad most of the time. 

It was called a joke to highlight some hypocrisy.

Not sure why you call me the same when I've clearly cited MANY left wing articles and media outlets.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin
1 minute ago, Faysalaaa said:

How can someone impeach without looking at the evidence? I think thats the point?

There isn't a vote yet. There is an inquiry. Part of that inquiry is getting to information on the transcript which isn't even complete. 

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Admin changed the title to Nancy Pelosi admits she hasn't read the Ukraine transcripts
1 minute ago, lego said:

 

You wrote this with straight face after commenting on another thread with “lol left leaning article lol!”

:air:

 

The right on this forum is hilarious, but pretty sad most of the time. 

There’s a difference between spreading a fake narrative created by a news station (CNN is a prime example that has been exposed and had their articles redacted several times), and a news source that is simply posting a video of a person actually saying something that is worthy of news (in this case Fox News). Both left and right news stations can be messy, but there is absolutely no way you can even try to claim Fox is pushing an agenda with this video when it’s simply broadcasting the words of Nancy Pelosi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Temptation
1 minute ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

There isn't a vote yet. There is an inquiry. Part of that inquiry is getting to information on the transcript which isn't even complete. 

No. They are just so convinced they will lose the election (again!) that they are doing everything to make it happen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JusKeepBreathin said:

There isn't a vote yet. There is an inquiry. Part of that inquiry is getting to information on the transcript which isn't even complete. 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-ukraine-unredacted-call-transcript-read-ukraine-president-released-by-white-house-today-2019-09-25-live-updates/

 

The Trump administration has released the much-anticipated transcript summary of President Trump's phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, after Mr. Trump authorized publishing the transcript. A memo summarizing the call shows that the president urged Zelensky to probe Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALGAYDO

Nnnnn not these idiot conservatives thinking someone can read something that isn’t even available to them. Wtf? Did Nancy somehow develop mind reading???? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...