Gaga Monster 13,001 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536 GGD Presidential Elections Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga Monster 13,001 Posted February 16, 2019 Author Share Posted February 16, 2019 Just like I predicted, there will be no evidence of Russian Collusion GGD Presidential Elections Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 109,896 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 “Direct” is the key word. Circumstancial evidence is a thing. Just look at all the Trump officials who lied about their contacts with Russians. Why is that? I will wait for the Mueller report before I count anything out. Last year the House came out with a political “no collusion” BS report. Only one I’m taking seriously is Mueller. He’s the one who’s bringing the charges forward and throwing criminals in prison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 13 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said: Just like I predicted, there will be no evidence of Russian Collusion Did you even read the article? “Sen. Mark Warner, D.-Va., ranking member of the committee, told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday that he disagrees with the way Burr characterized the evidence about collusion, but he declined to offer his own assessment. "I'm not going to get into any conclusions I have," he said, before adding that "there's never been a campaign in American history ... that people affiliated with the campaign had as many ties with Russia as the Trump campaign did." Democratic Senate investigators who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity did not dispute Burr's characterizations, but said they lacked context. "We were never going to find a contract signed in blood saying, 'Hey Vlad, we're going to collude,'" one Democratic aide said. The series of contacts between Trump's associates, his campaign officials, his children and various Russians suggest a campaign willing to accept help from a foreign adversary, the Democrats say. By many counts, Trump and his associates had more than 100 contacts with Russians before the January 2017 presidential inauguration.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 This was not a real investigation.... Let's all be clear about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueenLG 2,469 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 27 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said: Just like I predicted, there will be no evidence of Russian Collusion Lmao. I can’t wait for the Mueller report to come out. You’re going to be shocked. Lol. Mueller has already alleged that Roger Stone colluded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted February 16, 2019 Share Posted February 16, 2019 More: Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are pushing back on a claim by the panel’s chair, Richard Burr (R-N.C.), that the committee’s two-year investigation has not found “anything that would suggest there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” And they dispute an NBC News report saying that Democrats agreed with Burr that they have yet to see clear evidence of a conspiracy between President Donald Trump and Moscow. “That’s not true,” Sen. Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, told Mother Jones. “I think it’s misleading. The intelligence committee hasn’t discussed the matter, let alone released a committee report.” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), a senior Democrat on the panel, and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the committee, also said they have not reached any conclusions about their investigation. “I disagree,” Warner said Tuesday when asked about Burr’s claims. In an interview Tuesday afternoon, Warner told Mother Jones that the committee is still far from completing its probe. “We’ve still got many of the most major figures to either come or come back,” he said. The committee is still seeking interviews with Trump associates including former national security adviser Michael Flynn, ex-Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos, and Rick Gates, the former Trump campaign official and right-hand man to imprisoned former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Warner, citing the Manafort revelations, said the public record alone challenges any conclusion that the Trump campaign did not conspire with Russia. “The notion that the president’s campaign manager was sharing internal campaign documents with the Russians in advance of the release of information that came from Russia and that interfered massively with the campaign is mind-boggling,” Warner said. “I’m not going to reach any conclusions at all, but all these facts are already in the public domain.” “The president is terrified about where our investigation and where the Mueller investigation may lead,” Warner added. “I think we’ll let the facts speak for themselves.” https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/02/senate-intelligence-committee-democrats-dispute-claims-russia-probe-found-no-collusion/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.