Gyan 692 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Same energy tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sneaky Oliver 22,221 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 What if the Water girl becomes an actual actress and walks the red carpet in the future?! I don’t wanna be one of the 99 people who didn’t believe in her Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgesdvl 786 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 I feel like she's overreacting its just water... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Boy 3,260 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Lighten up grandma Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CannaeDrive 3,412 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 The Art of Photo bombing Award Events done right. "Fame Is A Boomerang" - Maria Callas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrawberryBlond 14,881 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 I had no idea about this. That kind of advertising is too overt to be legal, surely? If this was in the UK, Ofcom would be investigating it for unfair levels of exposure. This is an event for celebrities and therefore, non-famous water girls have no business being in the background in photos, it ruins the picture and isn't appropriate. Glad to see that Jamie is calling out this nonsense for what it is rather than just being an silent observer like so many clearly were. No one seems to want to address the elephant in the room anymore, even when it's trashing the place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyZiggs 30,062 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Wolf Boy said: Lighten up grandma delete skaasdghkla Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
insight 2,440 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Funny AF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat 6,162 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 53 minutes ago, StrawberryBlond said: I had no idea about this. That kind of advertising is too overt to be legal, surely? If this was in the UK, Ofcom would be investigating it for unfair levels of exposure. This is an event for celebrities and therefore, non-famous water girls have no business being in the background in photos, it ruins the picture and isn't appropriate. Glad to see that Jamie is calling out this nonsense for what it is rather than just being an silent observer like so many clearly were. No one seems to want to address the elephant in the room anymore, even when it's trashing the place. Ikr, this would've been allowed anywhere in Europe I guess. Unfair promotion, thank you next. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elijahfan 26,311 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Even though Jamie definitely has a point, it's also not her first time at the rodeo.... The Golden Globes have always been a festival for public placements, especially Moët & Chandon. If she absolutely doesn't want to be associated with it, then she should just skip the event altogether. What what she even doing there anyway? Halloween wasn't nominated for anything. She could have refused to present at the ceremony. Wasn't she doing a bit of self-promo? It's a game, everyone has the right to play. So now Jamie, cut the bs for a minute please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elijahfan 26,311 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, StrawberryBlond said: I had no idea about this. That kind of advertising is too overt to be legal, surely? If this was in the UK, Ofcom would be investigating it for unfair levels of exposure. This is an event for celebrities and therefore, non-famous water girls have no business being in the background in photos, it ruins the picture and isn't appropriate. Glad to see that Jamie is calling out this nonsense for what it is rather than just being an silent observer like so many clearly were. No one seems to want to address the elephant in the room anymore, even when it's trashing the place. Who do you think finances the ceremony? lol The Golden Globes would simply not be happening without sponsors. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
latina twilight 2,319 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 I didn't find it funny (??) I guess at the very beginning, but then after a couple more photos it was so OBVIOUS it was all a publicity campaign. Good for Jamie for calling it out, she didn't want to be part of it and they pretty much forced her to, I would be pissed. Okay, Fiji sponsored the event, and so? Are the celebrities forced to promote a product in order to attend? And are them being paid? I doubt that is the case. "YOU USED TO BE SO KIND, I NEVER KNEW YOU HAD SUCH A DIRRTY MIND". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow 6,632 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Bad publicity or not, kind of craving some Fiji water... How about y'all? Do your own research. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killa 17,491 Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 Wow the upstage is real. Werk that water for us thirsty beings Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maleficent 6 Posted January 10, 2019 Share Posted January 10, 2019 7 hours ago, River said: Watch her be on Ellen “On behalf of the Gay community (which Jamie Lee Curtis’s haircut is a member of), I forgive you” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.