Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

Hillary Clinton: "Europe must curb immigration to stop rightwing populists"


Benji

Featured Posts

Andy McQueen
4 minutes ago, Melech said:

I would like a Canadian model. Even center left parties support that currently in Germany at least. 

There needs to be a difference between immigration and asylum as in refugee law shouldn’t be changed. 

Trudeau had a "casting" though: 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/world/canada/trudeau-doesnt-separate-refugee-families-but-he-does-send-them-away-the-canada-letter.html

Which is sort of irritating, hm. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
SHALLOW
10 minutes ago, lego said:

 

You think this would stop? 

 

 

No, but at least young voters would stop voting right. I know many people my age who feel threatened by migrants,probably cause of the way they are portraied by medias ,and that leads them to vote right. I mean, even my gay friends vote right cause of that. They are willing to vote homophobic parties as long as they don’t let migrants in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy McQueen
10 minutes ago, QuantiQuentin said:

What contributed to the 'election' of Donald Trump is also mainly fake news and fake videos about Europe and immigration. I am European and I am absolutely not against immigration especially when it comes to the refugees. I consider that about 1 million people among 800 millions europeans is nothing. But this is not even the question, they are fleeing war. Helping refugees is fundamental.

THIS

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BlackFluid

Although what she said is problematic, can you imagine if we had a president who knows how to listen, read, and speak in complete sentences? :'( my heart. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andy McQueen said:

I need to clairfy: I support the Canadian model when it comes to immigration.

Asylum is something different. It’s an ethical discussion. Taking in refugees is ethical correct. But how to deal ethically correct with refugees when they are homophobic, sexist, antisemitic etc.? That’s the discussion, where I don’t have an answer to. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch

Yikes. It's like if she thought liberals should stop trying to legislate on "identity politics" because minorities fighting for rights enrages old white bigots into voting :rip: 

I get that the goal is "stop right-wing populism" which is a good thing, but caving in might not be the best way to do that.

She did not say anything about the racist stereotypes of immigrants coming from all over though, y'all chimed in with your own thoughts there :emma: 

 

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy McQueen
Just now, Melech said:

I need to clairfy: I support the Canadian model when it comes to immigration.

Asylum is something different. It’s an ethical discussion. Taking in refugees is ethical correct. But how to deal ethically correct with refugees when they are homophobic, sexist, antisemitic etc.? That’s the discussion, where I don’t have an answer to. 

I understand! 

Me neither... Sometimes dialog helps for learning, but sometimes it doesn't, sadly. :(

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Idk if true but I heard some people say that crimes and violence is rising a lot in some European places/countries where they left lots of immigrants in. These factors are sometimes due to different cultures or poverty, I think. Is this accurate? I've never been to Europe and I didn’t really search on the matter :air: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris Walz 2024

The right thing to do is sometimes not popular or easy to navigate. The problem here is not the immigrant. It's the nationalist, and most times, the racist ideology. I have to disagree with Hillary here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Syria and Iraq, despite their leaders, were doing just fine before morons like her decided regime change was a grand idea. 

If anything, it’s the US’ responsibility to provide new homes to those refugees, not Europe’s, but not surprised that the US doesn’t want to clean up its own mess. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daredevil

Didn’t she and many other Americans vote for wars that destabilized those countries and now she’s saying we shouldn’t allow children and their families to come to a safer place?

 

okay?

 

I’m not saying Europe is perfect, but so many Americans are pro-war and elect people that represent those values 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds like something that a politician would say if they were planing to run a campaign against a fascist but still wanted to appeal to rational conservatives, independents, and centrists.

Third times the charm, so they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Idk honestly. The whole situation with refugees and immigrants and the middle east and stuff is all just becoming a bit much and it's really hard to find the right balance imo. There are the obvious side effects of immigrations (such as her point) but there's also the humanitarian issue of leaving these people in the sad places where they live. It's very hard to say imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...