Jump to content

PETA slams Lady Gaga


Americano
 Share

Featured Posts

I love her so much and this doesn’t take away from all the great things she does do and bring to this world… but it’s truly disappointing to me :(

And yet it's okay to wear leather?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 605
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • garnite

    45

  • AbeTheBabe

    25

  • jhonyguy04

    20

  • Americano

    16

eris servant

People people,

LEATHER IS AS ALSO SKIN BUT WITHOUT THE HAIR.

I see no one complaining about that so far? Everyone loves the Noritaka Tatehana shoes?

No we don't need meat. Vegans survive very easily :rofl:

And also, in colder regions people need fur to survive, even these days.

Yes, they can, but it's not the best option. It is more healthy to eat meat. I've had this discussion with a doctor. Our body is built to process both plants and meat. From teeth to our digestive tract

Link to post
Share on other sites

People people,

LEATHER IS AS ALSO SKIN BUT WITHOUT THE HAIR.

I see no one complaining about that so far?

LEATHER is a byproduct of the MEAT FOR CONSUMPTION industry.

FUR is a byproduct of the LOOK AT THAT PRETTY ANIMAL HIDE I WANT TO WEAR IT industry.

they're not moral equivalents if you take the fact that sustenance comes from one of them. yes, then you can argue that eating meat is not okay, but this isn't the same topic. it doesn't make fur any less wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can, but it's not the best option. It is more healthy to eat meat. I've had this discussion with a doctor. Our body is built to process both plants and meat. From teeth to our digestive tract

That's so far from true. Yes our teeth are shaped to eat meat.

But any reports on meat causing colon cancer for example? It's not black and white. The problem is that people NOW suddenly jump at her for wearing fur, but no one seems to notice when leather is worn. Or the meat dress. And yet people call her hypocritical?

LEATHER is a byproduct of the MEAT FOR CONSUMPTION industry.

FUR is a byproduct of the LOOK AT THAT PRETTY ANIMAL HIDE I WANT TO WEAR IT industry.

they're not moral equivalents if you take the fact that sustenance comes from one of them. yes, then you can argue that eating meat is not okay, but this isn't the same topic. it doesn't make fur any less wrong.

Rabbits are also a meat industry. And no not all calf leather is from the meat industry either! The softest kind of leather comes from killing an unborn calf fetus. No one eats that afterwards.

Also goat etc is also eaten but worn as fur.

Edited by Philip
Link to post
Share on other sites

shes not fukcin slagging your beliefs, like wow really? god the DRAMA on all of this.

Of course she is and mine too if i'm honest as its not a topic to be taken lightly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monster_95

So everyone has to share YOUR beliefs as not to offend you? It's obviously fine to be against leather and meat and fur but you can't expect everyone else not to indulge in it just to spare your feelings

No thats not it. It's the fact that she is doing it trying to be funny. She doesn't know what them animals go through. And its completely different to leather and meat. They are acceptable but fur is not acceptable in any case. Vanity is an awful thing.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ****. Humans are at the top of food chain the victors should survive and lessors must die :nacho:

Edited by Envy
♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats not it. It's the fact that she is doing it trying to be funny. She doesn't know what them animals go through. And its completely different to leather and meat. They are acceptable but fur is not acceptable in any case. Vanity is an awful thing.....

People would like to believe that it's SO different. But nope not really. Mink isn't eaten! But goats etc are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Americano

No thats not it. It's the fact that she is doing it trying to be funny. She doesn't know what them animals go through. And its completely different to leather and meat. They are acceptable but fur is not acceptable in any case. Vanity is an awful thing.....

Where the hell did she say it was to be funny? :rofl:

Okay, so you're defending leather?

Edited by Americano
Link to post
Share on other sites

SKANK

no ****. Humans are at the top of food chain the victors should survive and lessors must die :nacho:

Sieg Heil!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ****. Humans are at the top of food chain the victors should survive and lessors must die :nacho:

You're absolutely right! It's the same for insecure gay kids. The popular pupils should kill them cause they're higher in the food chain, it's just fair :party:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rabbits are also a meat industry. And no not all calf leather is from the meat industry either! The softest kind of leather comes from killing an unborn calf fetus. No one eats that afterwards.

Also goat etc is also eaten but worn as fur.

he wasn't pitting rabbits against cows/the leather trade, though. he was using the example to try and quantify worth of life, so it's not relevant.

yes, not all leather is from the meat industry, but as far as i know, the majority is and that's a step in the right direction. i don't endorse the wearing of leather either.

yes, people wear goat fur and eat goat meat. this really isn't lessening the case against fur whatsoever. the majority of fur is from sought after animals that we don't eat, we just kill to wear. not good.

Edited by garnite
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...