First full-film ASIB review published

[River 90,988]

is it  going to metacritic ?

[theorist 1,161]

28 minutes ago, Gabe said:

LOL I'll be doing a double film day, start with venom and end with ASIB

why start with venom tho

[gag 22,449]

I've thought more about this and I'm just worried this review will backfire, honestly. It comes across as so ridiculously positive that it's setting up the movie for failure, i.e. if it's not unbelievably spectacular then it'll be disappointment to the fanbase and film circles. The claims are just... so much to live up to. Gaga on the same calibre as one of the best female performances of all time? Bradley compared to the greatest directors of all time? I hope this is not too debbie-downery but we've seen how early rave reviews eventually led to generally favorable reviews in the past with 5F2.

It's weird that this is posted so early. IIRC Warner Bros placed an embargo on all reviews until the 31st, when it premiers at Venice. It seems that the reviewer is breaking an NDA, either on purpose or as accidentally as a post queue error perhaps?

Anyway, we'll see whether other critics think the same soon enough.

I just wish this guy posted this review after Venice. 

[Space Cowboy 11,664]

This is kind of a big deal, actually.

[Fame IV 4,426]

14 minutes ago, gag said:

I've thought more about this and I'm just worried this review will backfire, honestly. It comes across as so ridiculously positive that it's setting up the movie for failure, i.e. if it's not unbelievably spectacular then it'll be disappointment to the fanbase and film circles. The claims are just... so much to live up to. Gaga on the same calibre as one of the best female performances of all time? Bradley compared to the greatest directors of all time? I hope this is not too debbie-downery but we've seen how early rave reviews eventually led to generally favorable reviews in the past with 5F2.

It's weird that this is posted so early. IIRC Warner Bros placed an embargo on all reviews until the 31st, when it premiers at Venice. It seems that the reviewer is breaking an NDA, either on purpose or as accidentally as a post queue error perhaps?

Anyway, we'll see whether other critics think the same soon enough.

I just wish this guy posted this review after Venice. 

Don't worry. I think the movie will have a great response from the critics

[Lord Ryry 3,367]

page not found, uploaded too early? 

[gag 22,449]

2 minutes ago, Lord Ryry said:

page not found, uploaded too early? 

It's not working for me either

The Warner Bros cease and desist came THRU 

[littlepotter 72,847]

IM SCREAMING OH MY GOD

[littlepotter 72,847]

33 minutes ago, gag said:

I've thought more about this and I'm just worried this review will backfire, honestly. It comes across as so ridiculously positive that it's setting up the movie for failure, i.e. if it's not unbelievably spectacular then it'll be disappointment to the fanbase and film circles. The claims are just... so much to live up to. 

but the thing is only WE are the ones with these expectations. not the gp. they do not have acting expectations of lady gaga. i dont see how you think this one review is going to be read by every moviegoer and build up their expectations

[Carpet Shark 223]

Available for a short time only (until embargo has expired):

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbyAb5CuyVQJ:https://www.talkhouse.com/bradley-coopers-triumphant-a-star-is-born-is-an-instant-classic/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&client=firefox-b

[Jacob Marley 538]

His comment on an emotionally-shattering finale...I’ve never seen the earlier versions...but I’m starting to think it all ends really badly (but the plot is flipped). I’m trying to be vague so I don’t spoil anything. 

[SwissMonster 27,836]

42 minutes ago, theorist said:

why start with venom tho

You save the best things for them end 

[PunkTheFunk 121,511]

54 minutes ago, Vitleysingur said:

Okay guys, I did a bit research on his reviews that were counted to Rotten Tomatoes. It seems that he has a very UNIQUE taste for films.

41 out of his 107 reviews were the opposed to the final T-Meter (Certificated Fresh / Fresh / Rotten). By saying opposed, I mean his rating being Fresh while T-Meter being rotten or the reverse. It seems that he likes exaggerating things.

For example:

Take with a grain of salt sis. But I hope he is accurate about ASIB lol.

Nnnnn yikes  Someone put this in the OP so we don't get our hopes up too much

[theorist 1,161]

55 minutes ago, Vitleysingur said:

Okay guys, I did a bit research on his reviews that were counted to Rotten Tomatoes. It seems that he has a very UNIQUE taste for films.

41 out of his 107 reviews were the opposed to the final T-Meter (Certificated Fresh / Fresh / Rotten). By saying opposed, I mean his rating being Fresh while T-Meter being rotten or the reverse. It seems that he likes exaggerating things.

For example:

Take with a grain of salt sis. But I hope he is accurate about ASIB lol.

"Norbit is a return to form for Murphy"

[SpeechIess 1,060]

Oscars incomingT