Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
society

Canadian baby 'first without gender designation' on health card


OBEY

Featured Posts

R3L04DED J

I definitely would've been bullied less if gender boundaries weren't so strict. So I'm here for it.

Rowt ay soyng aybouwt yer eyesh, ayt ay sliysche ohf cherreh pye. Eye crei'd awl noiyght.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
britneygaga99

I don't understand this, they should just write M/F, then if his/her gender coincides alright, otherwise they can change it. That would make a lot more sense. 

Also biological sex is important for medical treatment, they can't just hide it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buddy

I have no problem with a child's gender being "U", but there better be biological sex in the documentation because like it or not, that is relevant. 

14 minutes ago, King J said:

I definitely would've been bullied less if gender boundaries weren't so strict. So I'm here for it.

This isn't going to change the way children/youth view gender, though. It is purely a legal/medical matter. No one is going to know this person's birth certificate says "U"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kermit

The helllllllll?

 

Is it a male or a damn female?

 

"Don't ask the baby's sex, they don't know yet."

 

They were born hours ago and are probably wondering where the **** they are.

 

Gender is something that can be handled in the future. Sex is something that needs to be consistent with a human. That is far more important than socially constructed issues which the baby MIGHT face LATER on in life when old enough to make a decision for themselves, if that's even their life. 

 

I'm sorry but some people are getting confused between evolution and biological reduction. 

 

This is disgusting. Don't quote me.

“For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.” ― Jean Dubuffet
Link to post
Share on other sites

Goosey
5 hours ago, Morphine Prince said:

Sex is biological though. 

Why don't we have both on birth certificates, etc? One checkbox for sex, and another for gender?

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morphine Prince
4 minutes ago, Goosey said:

Why don't we have both on birth certificates, etc? One checkbox for sex, and another for gender?

Because sex and gender have been intertwined for so long. 

Most people lump them together. It's something society needs to unlearn. It's a slow process. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sneaky Oliver

I don't be the problematic over here but I believe the gender helps the child to develop its personality. This "discover by yourself" is no good. But YEAH kids must have the freedom to choose if he/she identifies with the opposite gender. They just can't do it if they don't know sh*t about both sides :emma:

Link to post
Share on other sites

crisTEAne

i think it's socio-culturally progressive. it always seems counter-intuitive and overly liberal to alter the very foundation of an already existing system—in this case, the binary system—simply because preconceived ideas are presented and thought of as ultimate truths. well, they are not. as one member said above, if gendered expectations were not positioned within a binary matrix, it would've helped me a great deal as i wouldn't have been bullied that much. kudos to the parent, i'm here for it. 

if you hurt taylor swift, i'll hurt you back
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...