Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
politics

CNN fires Reza Aslan after anti-Trump tweet


manicholic

Featured Posts

Lady Palutena

CNN = Cancelled News Network :lana:

Adoremus in caelum, Palutena. Dea luminis.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Monster34
14 minutes ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

Yeah what? No.  Thats not how being a person of color works sis :wtf: It's not a conditional or temporary state of being. Albino black people are people of color, light skinned hispanic people are people of color, light skinned black people are people of color, mixed people are people of color (at least in America). You may have a different level of privilege than other people of color, but its all intersectional.

Also, "as one would expect from a highly educated individual" what?  That's actually hella problematic  

I am a white person (as Canadians consider me) but I also am from a country where such terminology for skin colours don't exist in the context of ethnic designations; hence I think I am much more able to see the big picture compared to North Americans. 

The term people of colour is insulting. It is as if you only call BMWs by their name, and call all other cars as "Other Cars". I really don't have any respect for anyone who can call themselves "People of Colour" like bitch congrats, you are like a piece of steak, there is Kobe Steak, the best, vs Other Steaks, you are the other option. You'll ask me what made me think that POC is the Other Steaks ? Well because you only name what matters, rest is just others. 

If you think my last statement is problematic, I would like to ask you to look around. First condition to be considered as white, unless you clearly are not (according to North American approach to it), is to be seen as educated, as member of "respectable" socio-economical class. That's literally what I've learnt in North America, it's so obvious that trying to reject it seems delulu to me :deadbanana: 

By all these associations, Reza Aslan is a white man; hence the root of this conversation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

manicholic
1 hour ago, Monster34 said:

Definition of POC is naturalized, hence totally depends on one's appearance and associations. 

also he doesn't dress up in some local attire, not even look "POC". I don't think anyone considered Aslan to be a POC. 

 

So by your logic, someone like Rachel Dolezal is the real POC here, right? 

rachel-dolezal.jpg

There's nothing harder for people to do than admit they were fooled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

manicholic
12 minutes ago, Monster34 said:

I am a white person (as Canadians consider me) but I also am from a country where such terminology for skin colours don't exist in the context of ethnic designations; hence I think I am much more able to see the big picture compared to North Americans. 

The term people of colour is insulting. It is as if you only call BMWs by their name, and call all other cars as "Other Cars". I really don't have any respect for anyone who can call themselves "People of Colour" like bitch congrats, you are like a piece of steak, there is Kobe Steak, the best, vs Other Steaks, you are the other option. You'll ask me what made me think that POC is the Other Steaks ? Well because you only name what matters, rest is just others. 

If you think my last statement is problematic, I would like to ask you to look around. First condition to be considered as white, unless you clearly are not (according to North American approach to it), is to be seen as educated, as member of "respectable" socio-economical class. That's literally what I've learnt in North America, it's so obvious that trying to reject it seems delulu to me :deadbanana: 

By all these associations, Reza Aslan is a white man; hence the root of this conversation. 

 

Have you considered that perhaps if you don't know anything about the history of systemic racism in America and what life actually is like for POC/Immigrants/Muslims here, maybe you don't NEED to comment on things you don't yet understand and instead take it as an opportunity to learn and educate yourself rather than judge? 

 

There's nothing harder for people to do than admit they were fooled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Monster34
7 minutes ago, manicholic said:

 

Have you considered that perhaps if you don't know anything about the history of systemic racism in America and what life actually is like for POC/Immigrants/Muslims here, maybe you don't NEED to comment on things you don't yet understand and instead take it as an opportunity to learn and educate yourself rather than judge? 

 

First of all, stop using the term POC. You, yourself, put the white first, as the reference point, as the point all curves should reach ideally, and marginal points around it hence the term POC taking the white as the one and only central reference point. 

That was my whole point. Now since, you talked about a systematic racism I don't know according to you, tell me from where did you get the idea that I don't know it, and what part I don't know so that I can properly answer you. In addition, the term POC is extension of that systematic racism and you still use the term. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ItsTommyBitch
39 minutes ago, Monster34 said:

I am a white person (as Canadians consider me) but I also am from a country where such terminology for skin colours don't exist in the context of ethnic designations; hence I think I am much more able to see the big picture compared to North Americans. 

The term people of colour is insulting. It is as if you only call BMWs by their name, and call all other cars as "Other Cars". I really don't have any respect for anyone who can call themselves "People of Colour" like bitch congrats, you are like a piece of steak, there is Kobe Steak, the best, vs Other Steaks, you are the other option. You'll ask me what made me think that POC is the Other Steaks ? Well because you only name what matters, rest is just others. 

If you think my last statement is problematic, I would like to ask you to look around. First condition to be considered as white, unless you clearly are not (according to North American approach to it), is to be seen as educated, as member of "respectable" socio-economical class. That's literally what I've learnt in North America, it's so obvious that trying to reject it seems delulu to me :deadbanana: 

The 'splaining :deadbanana: The rudeness :deadbanana: Yikes :deadbanana: I don't have time to explain to you the origin and usage of the term throughout history, or its purpose, and you seem to not care how other people use it, so you do you.

I get you think its being used referentially, but that referential relationship is important in discussing the way minorities have shared experiences because of their nonwhiteness :saladga: 

私自身もこの世の中も誰もかれもが, どんなに華やかな人生でも, どんなに悲惨な人生でも, いつかは変貌し, 破壊され、消滅してしまう. すべてがもともとこの世に存在しない一瞬の幻想なのだから
Link to post
Share on other sites

JusKeepBreathin
2 hours ago, HOMODRAKE said:

So, it's okay to be an offensive (Caucasian) asshole towards millions of people (O'Reilly), but not okay for a POC (Aslan) to be offensive towards ONE person just because he's a (Caucasian piece of ****) president... okay. 

 

You didn't even mention Tucker and Hannity, who are equally offensive and misogynistic.

"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King Jr.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lion Heart

Fake News CNN. 

 

I'll guess I just stick with MSNBC

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...