Trump cuts abortion funding overseas, places hiring freeze on fed. workers

[Economy 52,845]

43 minutes ago, JustLikeHoney said:

For the same reason the US aids Isreal to the tune of $38 billion for its military. Why not also help women receive safe abortions? My question is why wouldn't we help save women's lives or is help only OK when it's used in war. 

War and Military is a seperate issue. Ive always hated how militarized the world is...

 

In fact nothing would make me happier than military cuts since its the biggest economic drain ever

 

But were not talking about military right now

[Whispering 18,865]

"Job Creation"

Step 1.) Freeze hiring

[Whispering 18,865]

Oh, and about 30% of all new federal workers hired are veterans.  

"I'll support the Veterens." 

[Luc 4,776]

7 hours ago, Pablo said:

I see your point but why are international groups being funded by the US. We are already is mega debt, the only good thing from Trump MIGHT be is how he MAY reduce spending (I don't like the guy and he may make it worse tbh)

It's not some kind of aid to abortions, these are government subsidies to NGOs that happen to also mention abortions somewhere on their site, or that spend 1% of their time/money on birth restriction. These companies will no longer get any government money at all, basically forcing them to give up anything abortion-related.

Under Trump's plans the national debt is expected to rise very quickly. ObamaCare repeal is expected to cost hundreds of billions alone. Bringing back coal or trying to bring back coal will do a lot. Spending hundreds of billions on infrastructure like airports will cost hundreds of billions (duh). Tax cuts for the rich, for companies and for the poor will cost a lot. Pleasing Trump's electorate to win the next elections will cost A LOT. Historically speaking Democrats always spend less than Republicans as president. I hope that there will be some Republicans in Congress who stand up against Trump, but I have my doubts.

[shane_c 480]

This gags people from talking about abortion, it doesn't cut abortion funding.

[pink sushi 4,351]

I will NEVER understand how a group of old men can make decisions on what women do with their bodies.  

[AddMeOnMYSPACE 2,097]

1 minute ago, pink sushi said:

I will NEVER understand how a group of old men can make decisions on what women do with their bodies.  

This. 

[FMB 465]

It's no surprise that this would happen right after the Women's March. He's so vindictive. It's like he saw the Yuge! sizes of the marches in the US and worldwide and his fragile ego had to make them pay. It's just the tip of the iceberg.

[malazam 15,710]

DISGUSTING. He signed it surrounded by men 

STOP CONTROLLYING WOMEN

[KleinGa 18,177]

10 hours ago, MyQueen said:

Two steps backward

YES. 

[August Blue 8,566]

11 hours ago, kyanewest said:

Taking one step forward, one step backward

7291385 backward