Born Brave 2,072 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Just now, Whispering said: Just like they left all the First Ladies and First Kids in the past alone....oh wait.... The first family has always been under a microscope. Get used to it. What are you even saying? Like you are making no sense whatsoever. At this point you have literally ran out of ammo and you're just reaching for insults lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Justinn said: I wasn't there lol. Seriously are you really asking me that? Her secret service agents have come forward and have discussed her drinking problem - Yeah, yeah, yeah...like I said, Faux News and right wing conspiracy crap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Justinn said: What are you even saying? Like you are making no sense whatsoever. At this point you have literally ran out of ammo and you're just reaching for insults lol. The first family has always been disscussed in the media and in social circles. This isn't difficult to understand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born Brave 2,072 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Whispering said: Yeah, yeah, yeah...like I said, Faux News and right wing conspiracy crap. Lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersonic 49,376 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Just now, Whispering said: The first family has always been disscussed in the media and in social circles. This isn't difficult to understand. Like... Michelle Obama and her children have been called monkeys by several established right-leaning news outlets and journalists. There have been several scientific studies about Michelle Obama's hair choices in relation to her being a black woman (as in relaxed vs. natural hair) The scrutiny put on the Trump family is pretty tame in comparison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Trump 3,508 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Justinn said: That poor kid lol. You can tell they ALL had a long day and tbh I think it was still sinking in that they had won- they went into the nite expecting to be giving a concession speech (the polls has said so for 3 weeks almost). It's truly remarkable that he managed to win against the odds he was facing. People are so outraged but I think their anger should be directed at the Clinton campaign for taking PA, WI, and MI for granted. Those states had been blue since the 60s. Regardless of how sleepy Barron was that nite- I would have killed to have been a fly on the wall for Hillary's drunk fit after she found out she lost. That's the real reason that she didn't give a speech that nite- I feel horrible for her supporters who stayed and stayed and wanted to hear their candidate for direction (seeing the results come in they had already been crying) and she instead sends Podesta out to say "We aren't conceding there are a lot of votes to be counted so go home"- Then she calls Trump not 30 minutes later and concedes.. Clearly they just wanted to take the pressure off of her making any kind of statement because she was already **** faced at her hotel room. MTE but apparently Trump's campaign knew they were on the path to victory. Kellyanne Conway, his campaign manager, has run The Polling Company for decades, and her polls were much more accurate than the polls the media used. She stated she had known for weeks that Trump was going to win when Hillary couldn't break through a 46% ceiling basically across the board. She said it in interviews over and over, and the media really went hard against Trump to distract from his rising in the poll. Trump did five rallies in one day, and went and cut a ribbon at his hotel that same day and the media spun it as Trump not doing anything, when he had just done five rallies. Hillary also amped up millions more in paid advertising against Trump, and even the questions asked to Trump were, "Will you and your protestors accept the election results?" It turned out that Hillary's protestors were the ones that couldn't accept the results. Ma ma pa pa pa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, Justinn said: Lol. I would explain the rating to you...bug nah...just stay in your alt right/racist world. It's not worth my time to bother. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Trump 3,508 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 Just now, Whispering said: I would explain the rating to you...bug nah...just stay in your alt right/racist world. It's not worth my time to bother. So now you're calling him a racist because he's not pro-Hillary? I'm not trying to argue. Nothing in any of his statements indicated that. Ma ma pa pa pa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Justinn said: Right? And nevermind the fact that he self financed almost ALL of his campaign- he didn't accept superPAC and lobbyist money in the primaries like HRC did.. and he didn't have George Soros spending millions behind the scenes to get him elected (Most people on here have no idea who George Soros is- why would they even know?) Soros is the same guy that is pumping protests into cities by bus http://thefreethoughtproject.com/soros-trump-protests-revolution/ What's more funny to me is that HRC spent $897.7 million on this election and STILL lost. Trump spent half of that. http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-presidential-campaign-fundraising/ I guess if it gets reallllyyy tight Trump can always use the Trump foundation to siphon money in with a "pay to play" program. Including countries that allow the murder of innocent lgbt citizens and rape of women- Oh wait... Hillary did that already. OR I guess he could sell the 12 thousand dollar Armani jacket he wore to give a speech on income inequality- oh wait. Hillary already did that. ORRRR I guess he could charge almost a million bucks to speak to wall-street behind closed doors and make sure the transcript never got released.. Oh wait. Hillary already did that. Donald Trump is not taking the annual $400,000 salary paid to Presidents. No one says anything about that- but if he WAS accepting it people would say "That rich **** doesn't need that money- **** his white privileged ass". I really cant think of anyone in American history that would give up a life of billionaire status to only be ridiculed, made fun of, and attacked just to serve their country. What country is he serving? Why are we still talking about Hillary? She's a non issue now. The point that people are making is that this is unprecedented and will affect people in NYC and add on unneeded costs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said: MTE but apparently Trump's campaign knew they were on the path to victory. Kellyanne Conway, his campaign manager, has run The Polling Company for decades, and her polls were much more accurate than the polls the media used. She stated she had known for weeks that Trump was going to win when Hillary couldn't break through a 46% ceiling basically across the board. She said it in interviews over and over, and the media really went hard against Trump to distract from his rising in the poll. Trump did five rallies in one day, and went and cut a ribbon at his hotel that same day and the media spun it as Trump not doing anything, when he had just done five rallies. Hillary also amped up millions more in paid advertising against Trump, and even the questions asked to Trump were, "Will you and your protestors accept the election results?" It turned out that Hillary's protestors were the ones that couldn't accept the results. I think they're protesting for good of society. And it's their "free speech". Now it's bad because liberals are doing it? The whole thing can be twisted against conservatives who went on racist rants about Obama. It's a non issue when the protesting is going on because there's actually a reason for it to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Trump 3,508 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said: I think they're protesting for good of society. And it's their "free speech". Now it's bad because liberals are doing it? The whole thing can be twisted against conservatives who went on racist rants about Obama. It's a non issue when the protesting is going on because there's actually a reason for it to happen. No, it's not bad, but it's ironic that they were asking that question when it turned out they were asking the right question, but to the wrong candidate. Ma ma pa pa pa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born Brave 2,072 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 9 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said: So now you're calling him a racist because he's not pro-Hillary? I'm not trying to argue. Nothing in any of his statements indicated that. I told someone to get deported after they called me a f a g on twitter so im a racist now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sara 1,144 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 35 minutes ago, Justinn said: Where are you getting this from? Everything I've found says this is a fake story: http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-had-drunken-meltdown-after-losing-the-election/ Is there some new evidence? Or is this Facebook news? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeleteMyAccount 11,881 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said: No, it's not bad, but it's ironic that they were asking that question when it turned out they were asking the right question, but to the wrong candidate. Trump wanting protests when Obama won in 2012, so I think the question could be answered both ways tbh. But again, the Trumps need to move into the WH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sara 1,144 Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 27 minutes ago, Justinn said: Lol. Yes, Fox has the best ratings because they have half the nation on lock. The other half has a variety of sources. You can spin that anyway you want, but it doesn't prove that Fox News is any more accurate than any other network. I think Fox News just took "propaganda news" to the next level, and they benefited from it greatly. The problem for Fox is that now there are tons of newer news sources that are even MORE biased and more sensational, and they are attacking Fox from the right. :P It's all a race to see who can be the most extreme to get the most views and clicks, and meanwhile anyone trying to do honest reporting is out of a job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.