Mike Pence gets booed at Hamilton Musical: they had a message for him

[President Trump 3,508]

I like Pence. He's really smart, and has good, positive energy. He did vote for a religious freedom bill, but then immediately amended it to protect LGBT, and stated, "Any restaurant that does not serve a gay person, I will not eat there." He's a champ.

[ZiggyZiggs 30,067]

25 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

I like Pence. He's really smart, and has good, positive energy. He did vote for a religious freedom bill, but then immediately amended it to protect LGBT, and stated, "Any restaurant that does not serve a gay person, I will not eat there." He's a champ.

R u serious? 

@Morphine Prince @Chris Evans @En_Sabah_Nur @Assarrai @Gracious Gaga @modern ecstasy 

[Logan 20,894]

You get what you give.

[RAMROD 117,985]

Well, he is either missing the memo that Broadway is one of major gay Mecca who will defend themselves from getting destroyed or he knows it and went anyway cos he wanna feel belong secretly or to have a survey and see how he can stop Broadway from being gay Mecca.

Pretty sure he have some agenda going there and this thing that Hamilton casts does to him may or may not affect his future decisions for better or worse.

[VOLANTIS 16,504]

27 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

I like Pence. He's really smart, and has good, positive energy. He did vote for a religious freedom bill, but then immediately amended it to protect LGBT, and stated, "Any restaurant that does not serve a gay person, I will not eat there." He's a champ.

Pence: Any restaurant that does not serve a gay person, I will not eat there.

Pence to Pence: Conversion therapy saved my marriage therefore all the gays are getting electrocuted.

[Goosey 3,017]

1 hour ago, uo111 said:

This is an adult, grown ass man who has dedicated his life to being an asshole.

Opinions 

[2007 5,291]

34 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

I like Pence. He's really smart, and has good, positive energy. He did vote for a religious freedom bill, but then immediately amended it to protect LGBT, and stated, "Any restaurant that does not serve a gay person, I will not eat there." He's a champ.

Well that wouldn't be a problem cuz they won't be at any restaurant. While he enjoy his meal at the so called "Pro-LGBT restaurant", they would be busy getting served 'electrecution' as the main dish and 'therapy' as a side. 

[President Trump 3,508]

3 minutes ago, ZiggyZiggs said:

R u serious? 

@Morphine Prince @Chris Evans @En_Sabah_Nur @Assarrai @Gracious Gaga

Yeah, bring them all here.

 

Mike Pence is not the gay-electrocuting devil.

 

46 minutes ago, ZiggyZiggs said:

THIS @ReidOne @PunkTheFunk

 

 

51 minutes ago, Batwings said:

Oh no, poor guy got booed. He must feel bad.

Almost as bad as the people living in fear of losing their rights. 

 

53 minutes ago, Bae said:

Sticking up for somebody who is electing the most extreme anti-gay politicians in the country? 

He deserves this. 

Well, none of this is true, and I'd bet that all of you in your heart know that it's not true. What a coincidence that every single person nominated just happens to be "a part of the KKK." This is a part of the smear campaign left over from the campaign, which honestly has over-extended its welcome. Trump was framed from the very beginning as a joke, and was never regarded as much else. That's why there is such a backlash against his winning. He was never a joke. I watched his debates, and his interviews, and his rallies, in full. There were real proposals, and there were real policies. There is also a real, savvy way he conveys his message in a genuine way. He appealed to those that weren't happy with the forced Affordable Care Act, and he appealed to those who had real concerns. He supports gays, women, and anyone of any creed. He has said it again, and again, and again. I guess nobody actually cares about that, or believes him, even though he's been saying it from the beginning.

People only believe the same three or four 5-second soundbites that every news station played repeatedly, which does not account for the measure of his campaign.

The entire end of Hillary's campaign focused on smearing Donald Trump, truly. It was not inspirational, it was merely, "Stop him." That is a literal view based off the content of her advertisements. She disappeared off the campaign trail and the entire theme built up Donald Trump as a villain. So of course the hundreds of millions spent on media propaganda, which is a real statistic and expenditure for political campaigns, had an effect on the perception of both candidates to the other side.

Of course nobody here will care about any problems effecting this country, except for the fact that the entire Republican Party is basically gridlocked into voting for religious freedom bills due to their electorate, although it has already been established that anti-gay measures are nowhere near the focus of this campaign, which for some reason is widely ignored, although you will condemn him for a 3-second soundbite for all eternity, but not pay any attention whatsoever to the 324 hours of rally speeches over the past few months.

People criticized him but his message really was, at essence, about patriotism, and aspiration, and opportunity, and freedom, and frankly, fairness. Ethics and veracity are qualifications for President of the United States, and the idea that temperament or what you said 20 years ago is an affirmative criteria that is more important is a theme that absolutely did not connect with voters.

The electorate for both parties have always been angry. I think "angry" as a way to describe the electorate, as it's used towards Republican voters this session, is a little bit of an excuse, and it's an excuse to not listen to the voters. It was easy to brush off all Republicans this year as "angry" or "peddling hate and divisiveness," when in reality most of them were just scared and frustrated by rising costs, and fear for not being able to pay their bills, and being unhappy with policy changes over the last 8 years, that no, do not include gays - it includes paying $80 extra a month in insurance costs, as I personally have been forced to do, or pay a penalty, which my friend has done, or have $3000 taken out of his paycheck, as my friend in the oil field has had happen to him, or have insurance companies start to find problems with paying for certain medications as they are able to assume more control as competition decreases, because I am now going to have to pay out-of-pocket for a medication that I've been taking for years because my insurance company suddenly decided they weren't going to pay for it anymore.

So yes, there are hundreds of factors that come into play and why people vote. The media focused on one thing this year, which was temperament, and that was an irrelevant factor for most of the country. Temperament on the debate stage does not affect the population, but policies do, and if you pay attention to what he was saying, his policies were fairly sound.

And no, they did not include electrocuting gays.

[ZiggyZiggs 30,067]

9 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

Yeah, bring them all here.

 

Mike Pence is not the gay-electrocuting devil.

 

 

 

Well, none of this is true, and I'd bet that all of you in your heart know that it's not true. What a coincidence that every single person nominated just happens to be "a part of the KKK." This is a part of the smear campaign left over from the campaign, which honestly has over-extended its welcome. Trump was framed from the very beginning as a joke, and was never regarded as much else. That's why there is such a backlash against his winning. He was never a joke. I watched his debates, and his interviews, and his rallies, in full. There were real proposals, and there were real policies. There is also a real, savvy way he conveys his message in a genuine way. He appealed to those that weren't happy with the forced Affordable Care Act, and he appealed to those who had real concerns. He supports gays, women, and anyone of any creed. He has said it again, and again, and again. I guess nobody actually cares about that, or believes him, even though he's been saying it from the beginning.

People only believe the same three or four 5-second soundbites that every news station played repeatedly, which does not account for the measure of his campaign.

The entire end of Hillary's campaign focused on smearing Donald Trump, truly. It was not inspirational, it was merely, "Stop him." That is a literal view based off the content of her advertisements. She disappeared off the campaign trail and the entire theme built up Donald Trump as a villain. So of course the hundreds of millions spent on media propaganda, which is a real statistic and expenditure for political campaigns, had an effect on the perception of both candidates to the other side.

Of course nobody here will care about any problems effecting this country, except for the fact that the entire Republican Party is basically gridlocked into voting for religious freedom bills due to their electorate, although it has already been established that anti-gay measures are nowhere near the focus of this campaign, which for some reason is widely ignored, although you will condemn him for a 3-second soundbite for all eternity, but not pay any attention whatsoever to the 324 hours of rally speeches over the past few months.

People criticized him but his message really was, at essence, about patriotism, and aspiration, and opportunity, and freedom, and frankly, fairness. Ethics and veracity are qualifications for President of the United States, and the idea that temperament or what you said 20 years ago is an affirmative criteria that is more important is a theme that absolutely did not connect with voters.

The electorate for both parties have always been angry. I think "angry" as a way to describe the electorate, as it's used towards Republican voters this session, is a little bit of an excuse, and it's an excuse to not listen to the voters. It was easy to brush off all Republicans this year as "angry" or "peddling hate and divisiveness," when in reality most of them were just scared and frustrated by rising costs, and fear for not being able to pay their bills, and being unhappy with policy changes over the last 8 years, that no, do not include gays - it includes paying $80 extra a month in insurance costs, as I personally have been forced to do, or pay a penalty, which my friend has done, or have $3000 taken out of his paycheck, as my friend in the oil field has had happen to him, or have insurance companies start to find problems with paying for certain medications as they are able to assume more control as competition decreases, because I am now going to have to pay out-of-pocket for a medication that I've been taking for years because my insurance company suddenly decided they weren't going to pay for it anymore.

So yes, there are hundreds of factors that come into play and why people vote. The media focused on one thing this year, which was temperament, and that was an irrelevant factor for most of the country. Temperament on the debate stage does not affect the population, but policies do, and if you pay attention to what he was saying, his policies were fairly sound.

And no, they did not include electrocuting gays.

[ReidOne 12,427]

22 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

Yeah, bring them all here.

 

Mike Pence is not the gay-electrocuting devil.

 

 

 

Well, none of this is true, and I'd bet that all of you in your heart know that it's not true. What a coincidence that every single person nominated just happens to be "a part of the KKK." This is a part of the smear campaign left over from the campaign, which honestly has over-extended its welcome. Trump was framed from the very beginning as a joke, and was never regarded as much else. That's why there is such a backlash against his winning. He was never a joke. I watched his debates, and his interviews, and his rallies, in full. There were real proposals, and there were real policies. There is also a real, savvy way he conveys his message in a genuine way. He appealed to those that weren't happy with the forced Affordable Care Act, and he appealed to those who had real concerns. He supports gays, women, and anyone of any creed. He has said it again, and again, and again. I guess nobody actually cares about that, or believes him, even though he's been saying it from the beginning.

People only believe the same three or four 5-second soundbites that every news station played repeatedly, which does not account for the measure of his campaign.

The entire end of Hillary's campaign focused on smearing Donald Trump, truly. It was not inspirational, it was merely, "Stop him." That is a literal view based off the content of her advertisements. She disappeared off the campaign trail and the entire theme built up Donald Trump as a villain. So of course the hundreds of millions spent on media propaganda, which is a real statistic and expenditure for political campaigns, had an effect on the perception of both candidates to the other side.

Of course nobody here will care about any problems effecting this country, except for the fact that the entire Republican Party is basically gridlocked into voting for religious freedom bills due to their electorate, although it has already been established that anti-gay measures are nowhere near the focus of this campaign, which for some reason is widely ignored, although you will condemn him for a 3-second soundbite for all eternity, but not pay any attention whatsoever to the 324 hours of rally speeches over the past few months.

People criticized him but his message really was, at essence, about patriotism, and aspiration, and opportunity, and freedom, and frankly, fairness. Ethics and veracity are qualifications for President of the United States, and the idea that temperament or what you said 20 years ago is an affirmative criteria that is more important is a theme that absolutely did not connect with voters.

The electorate for both parties have always been angry. I think "angry" as a way to describe the electorate, as it's used towards Republican voters this session, is a little bit of an excuse, and it's an excuse to not listen to the voters. It was easy to brush off all Republicans this year as "angry" or "peddling hate and divisiveness," when in reality most of them were just scared and frustrated by rising costs, and fear for not being able to pay their bills, and being unhappy with policy changes over the last 8 years, that no, do not include gays - it includes paying $80 extra a month in insurance costs, as I personally have been forced to do, or pay a penalty, which my friend has done, or have $3000 taken out of his paycheck, as my friend in the oil field has had happen to him, or have insurance companies start to find problems with paying for certain medications as they are able to assume more control as competition decreases, because I am now going to have to pay out-of-pocket for a medication that I've been taking for years because my insurance company suddenly decided they weren't going to pay for it anymore.

So yes, there are hundreds of factors that come into play and why people vote. The media focused on one thing this year, which was temperament, and that was an irrelevant factor for most of the country. Temperament on the debate stage does not affect the population, but policies do, and if you pay attention to what he was saying, his policies were fairly sound.

And no, they did not include electrocuting gays.

Sis... Sis... 

Yes!!! 

 

[2007 5,291]

29 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

Yeah, bring them all here.

 

Mike Pence is not the gay-electrocuting devil.

 

 

 

Well, none of this is true, and I'd bet that all of you in your heart know that it's not true. What a coincidence that every single person nominated just happens to be "a part of the KKK." This is a part of the smear campaign left over from the campaign, which honestly has over-extended its welcome. Trump was framed from the very beginning as a joke, and was never regarded as much else. That's why there is such a backlash against his winning. He was never a joke. I watched his debates, and his interviews, and his rallies, in full. There were real proposals, and there were real policies. There is also a real, savvy way he conveys his message in a genuine way. He appealed to those that weren't happy with the forced Affordable Care Act, and he appealed to those who had real concerns. He supports gays, women, and anyone of any creed. He has said it again, and again, and again. I guess nobody actually cares about that, or believes him, even though he's been saying it from the beginning.

People only believe the same three or four 5-second soundbites that every news station played repeatedly, which does not account for the measure of his campaign.

The entire end of Hillary's campaign focused on smearing Donald Trump, truly. It was not inspirational, it was merely, "Stop him." That is a literal view based off the content of her advertisements. She disappeared off the campaign trail and the entire theme built up Donald Trump as a villain. So of course the hundreds of millions spent on media propaganda, which is a real statistic and expenditure for political campaigns, had an effect on the perception of both candidates to the other side.

Of course nobody here will care about any problems effecting this country, except for the fact that the entire Republican Party is basically gridlocked into voting for religious freedom bills due to their electorate, although it has already been established that anti-gay measures are nowhere near the focus of this campaign, which for some reason is widely ignored, although you will condemn him for a 3-second soundbite for all eternity, but not pay any attention whatsoever to the 324 hours of rally speeches over the past few months.

People criticized him but his message really was, at essence, about patriotism, and aspiration, and opportunity, and freedom, and frankly, fairness. Ethics and veracity are qualifications for President of the United States, and the idea that temperament or what you said 20 years ago is an affirmative criteria that is more important is a theme that absolutely did not connect with voters.

The electorate for both parties have always been angry. I think "angry" as a way to describe the electorate, as it's used towards Republican voters this session, is a little bit of an excuse, and it's an excuse to not listen to the voters. It was easy to brush off all Republicans this year as "angry" or "peddling hate and divisiveness," when in reality most of them were just scared and frustrated by rising costs, and fear for not being able to pay their bills, and being unhappy with policy changes over the last 8 years, that no, do not include gays - it includes paying $80 extra a month in insurance costs, as I personally have been forced to do, or pay a penalty, which my friend has done, or have $3000 taken out of his paycheck, as my friend in the oil field has had happen to him, or have insurance companies start to find problems with paying for certain medications as they are able to assume more control as competition decreases, because I am now going to have to pay out-of-pocket for a medication that I've been taking for years because my insurance company suddenly decided they weren't going to pay for it anymore.

So yes, there are hundreds of factors that come into play and why people vote. The media focused on one thing this year, which was temperament, and that was an irrelevant factor for most of the country. Temperament on the debate stage does not affect the population, but policies do, and if you pay attention to what he was saying, his policies were fairly sound.

And no, they did not include electrocuting gays.

I'm not sure whether we're talking about the same Mike Pence here, his hate towards the LGBT community isn't a topic of debate at this point. He might have some good policies but his discrimination against some groups is a turn off by itself, it shows his ignorant side. 

 

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2016/07/mike-pences-top-seven-homophobic-moments-many/

[ItsTommyBitch 12,640]

37 minutes ago, Ma Ma Pa Pa Pa said:

Well, none of this is true, and I'd bet that all of you in your heart know that it's not true. What a coincidence that every single person nominated just happens to be "a part of the KKK." This is a part of the smear campaign left over from the campaign, which honestly has over-extended its welcome. Trump was framed from the very beginning as a joke, and was never regarded as much else. That's why there is such a backlash against his winning. He was never a joke. I watched his debates, and his interviews, and his rallies, in full. There were real proposals, and there were real policies. There is also a real, savvy way he conveys his message in a genuine way. He appealed to those that weren't happy with the forced Affordable Care Act, and he appealed to those who had real concerns. He supports gays, women, and anyone of any creed. He has said it again, and again, and again. I guess nobody actually cares about that, or believes him, even though he's been saying it from the beginning.

People only believe the same three or four 5-second soundbites that every news station played repeatedly, which does not account for the measure of his campaign.

The entire end of Hillary's campaign focused on smearing Donald Trump, truly. It was not inspirational, it was merely, "Stop him." That is a literal view based off the content of her advertisements. She disappeared off the campaign trail and the entire theme built up Donald Trump as a villain. So of course the hundreds of millions spent on media propaganda, which is a real statistic and expenditure for political campaigns, had an effect on the perception of both candidates to the other side.

Of course nobody here will care about any problems effecting this country, except for the fact that the entire Republican Party is basically gridlocked into voting for religious freedom bills due to their electorate, although it has already been established that anti-gay measures are nowhere near the focus of this campaign, which for some reason is widely ignored, although you will condemn him for a 3-second soundbite for all eternity, but not pay any attention whatsoever to the 324 hours of rally speeches over the past few months.

People criticized him but his message really was, at essence, about patriotism, and aspiration, and opportunity, and freedom, and frankly, fairness. Ethics and veracity are qualifications for President of the United States, and the idea that temperament or what you said 20 years ago is an affirmative criteria that is more important is a theme that absolutely did not connect with voters.

The electorate for both parties have always been angry. I think "angry" as a way to describe the electorate, as it's used towards Republican voters this session, is a little bit of an excuse, and it's an excuse to not listen to the voters. It was easy to brush off all Republicans this year as "angry" or "peddling hate and divisiveness," when in reality most of them were just scared and frustrated by rising costs, and fear for not being able to pay their bills, and being unhappy with policy changes over the last 8 years, that no, do not include gays - it includes paying $80 extra a month in insurance costs, as I personally have been forced to do, or pay a penalty, which my friend has done, or have $3000 taken out of his paycheck, as my friend in the oil field has had happen to him, or have insurance companies start to find problems with paying for certain medications as they are able to assume more control as competition decreases, because I am now going to have to pay out-of-pocket for a medication that I've been taking for years because my insurance company suddenly decided they weren't going to pay for it anymore.

So yes, there are hundreds of factors that come into play and why people vote. The media focused on one thing this year, which was temperament, and that was an irrelevant factor for most of the country. Temperament on the debate stage does not affect the population, but policies do, and if you pay attention to what he was saying, his policies were fairly sound.

And no, they did not include electrocuting gays.

This is the most delusional defense of Trump-Pence I've seen in a very long time  

If you truly did any research into his "policy" proposals during the campaign (I followed it from day one, very intensely), most of the actual policy was rather impossible or stupid. During the debates, interviews, etc. there were literally several times where Trump was caught FLAT out lying about knowing what even his own policies meant, and when asked questions about foreign affairs, there were times where it was even clear that he did not know what certain terms were.

When your campaign refuses to decry the KKK, when he LIES about knowing a former grand wizard, when he says women should be punished for having abortions, when he mocks a disabled reporter on live television, when he runs his speech on "LOCK HER UP", when he makes sexist comments about women on the daily, when he brags about sexual assault, this is not a campaign about "freedom", american values, opportunity, values, etc. Patriotism and Nationalism are dangerously close concepts in America, and it often happens to be that people fall into the latter.  This is not hope. This is hatred. And its effects are demonstrable.  Also, please gtfo with "Donald Trump is a villain! Liberal media bias!". The media reported on Donald Trump mostly honestly. He DID do all of those things and say all of those things. Hillary was NOT a criminal for her email scandal. These are facts  

Donald Trump implied that his supporters should SHOOT Hillary Clinton and said that her email scandal was possibly the most heinous national security offense of all time, people brought hand cuffs, people sold and bought "Hillary is a ****" stickers at the RNC. They were supported. 

Also, The affordable care act is NOT perfect, but over 20 million people now have health insurance that they did not have before, Millennials have less financial strife in regards to insurance right out of high school/college, Places cannot turn you down for "pre-existing conditions" (a right that saves lives, especially for women), Women have access to reasonable amounts of birth control, and more. That he even ONCE wanted a sweeping repeal of the act shows that he does not care about these facts.  

Go watch the RNC again. 

Go watch the DNC again.

Go watch Trumps first and last speeches before election night.

Go watch Hillary's first and last speeches before election night.

Go watch the debates again.

Then come back and try to spout all of that absolute bull **** again please  

Spoiler

Also, to be fair, Mike Pence is not openly "for" conversion therapy, but he believes it should be a legal option and parents should have the right to do whatever is necessary to preserve the "straightness" of their child if they think it will work. 

This isn't as heinous sounding as "he supports electroshock therapy to turn your kids straight", but he is okay with the fact that this exists and believes it can be effective, which is still just as bad. 

 

[ZiggyZiggs 30,067]

1 minute ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

This is the most delusional defense of Trump-Pence I've seen in a very long time  

If you truly did any research into his "policy" proposals during the campaign (I followed it from day one, very intensely), most of the actual policy was rather impossible or stupid. During the debates, interviews, etc. there were literally several times where Trump was caught FLAT out lying about knowing what even his own policies meant, and when asked questions about foreign affairs, there were times where it was even clear that he did not know what certain terms were.

When your campaign refuses to decry the KKK, when he LIES about knowing a former grand wizard, when he says women should be punished for having abortions, when he mocks a disabled reporter on live television, when he runs his speech on "LOCK HER UP", when he makes sexist comments about women on the daily, when he brags about sexual assault, this is not a campaign about "freedom", american values, opportunity, values, etc. Patriotism and Nationalism are dangerously close concepts in America, and it often happens to be that people fall into the latter. 

The affordable care act is NOT perfect, but over 20 million people now have health insurance that they did not have before, Millennials have less financial strife in regards to insurance right out of high school/college, Places cannot turn you down for "pre-existing conditions" (a right that saves lives, especially for women), Women have access to reasonable amounts of birth control, and more. That he even ONCE wanted a sweeping repeal of the act shows that he does not care about these facts.  

[President Trump 3,508]

1 minute ago, ItsTommyBitch said:

This is the most delusional defense of Trump-Pence I've seen in a very long time  

If you truly did any research into his "policy" proposals during the campaign (I followed it from day one, very intensely), most of the actual policy was rather impossible or stupid. During the debates, interviews, etc. there were literally several times where Trump was caught FLAT out lying about knowing what even his own policies meant, and when asked questions about foreign affairs, there were times where it was even clear that he did not know what certain terms were.

When your campaign refuses to decry the KKK, when he LIES about knowing a former grand wizard, when he says women should be punished for having abortions, when he mocks a disabled reporter on live television, when he runs his speech on "LOCK HER UP", when he makes sexist comments about women on the daily, when he brags about sexual assault, this is not a campaign about "freedom", american values, opportunity, values, etc. Patriotism and Nationalism are dangerously close concepts in America, and it often happens to be that people fall into the latter. 

The affordable care act is NOT perfect, but over 20 million people now have health insurance that they did not have before, Millennials have less financial strife in regards to insurance right out of high school/college, Places cannot turn you down for "pre-existing conditions" (a right that saves lives, especially for women), Women have access to reasonable amounts of birth control, and more. That he even ONCE wanted a sweeping repeal of the act shows that he does not care about these facts.  

My entire point was about how the focus on rhetoric and temperament is not a point that is relevant to voters or to policies, and yet you cited temperament as a main issue in your post.

[ReidOne 12,427]