Melech 9,900 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, iCpro said: North Korea is a prime example, where all discussion that the state doesn't agree with is strictly prohibited and punished with indefinite incarceration. You can't compare North Korea to Germany though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iCpro 14,846 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 5 minutes ago, Simon said: You can't compare North Korea to Germany though You kinda can given it's happened to Germany before... 08, 09, 11, 13, 16, 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 Just now, iCpro said: You kinda can given it's happened to Germany before... Nope, in germany were never laws against hatred and bigotry before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockets 1,807 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 They can shut down fb for all I care. It's become a disgusting mess. The only girl I've ever loved was born with roses in her eyes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iCpro 14,846 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 7 minutes ago, Simon said: Nope, in germany were never laws against hatred and bigotry before. I was referring to the prohibition of certain thoughts or ideologies, which has most certainly happened in Germany before. Essentially the point that I'm trying to convey is that when we decide to ban an idea, it sets a precedent that allows the state to dictate what people can and cannot talk about, and once that has happened, freedom of speech ceases to exist, which almost inevitably leads to a police state. 08, 09, 11, 13, 16, 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 Just now, iCpro said: I was referring to the prohibition of certain thoughts or ideologies, which has most certainly happened in Germany before. Essentially the point that I'm trying to convey is that when we decide to ban an idea, it sets a precedent that allows the state to dictate what people can and cannot talk about, and once that has happened, freedom of speech ceases to exist, which almost inevitably leads to a police state. Everyone allowing those hate speeches is indirectly supporter of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc 4,776 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 26 minutes ago, iCpro said: North Korea is a prime example, where all discussion that the state doesn't agree with is strictly prohibited and punished with indefinite incarceration. There's a difference between denying science and denying what the entire modern history of Germany is based on, Holocaust is an extremely sensitive subject in Germany, so much that there really is no need for 'discussion' or 'free speech' on this: any other opinion about the Holocaust is by definition hate speech as it is the denial of the death of millions of jews and equals neo-nazism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iCpro 14,846 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 1 minute ago, Simon said: Everyone allowing those hate speeches is indirectly supporter of it. except for the fact that hate speech is not covered under freedom of speech as it directly endangers others. I even said in my first two comments that I don't believe hate speech such as threats or inciting violence should be allowed. 08, 09, 11, 13, 16, 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 Just now, iCpro said: except for the fact that hate speech is not covered under freedom of speech as it directly endangers others. I even said in my first two comments that I don't believe hate speech such as threats or inciting violence should be allowed. And still you are here defending holocaust denial Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iCpro 14,846 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 Just now, Simon said: And still you are here defending holocaust denial I've literally said in three different posts that it's stupid and I don't agree with it at all. What I am defending is an individual's right to believe and discuss whatever ideas they have. Just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean I want it to be banned. 08, 09, 11, 13, 16, 20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melech 9,900 Posted November 5, 2016 Author Share Posted November 5, 2016 6 minutes ago, iCpro said: I've literally said in three different posts that it's stupid and I don't agree with it at all. What I am defending is an individual's right to believe and discuss whatever ideas they have. Just because I don't agree with something doesn't mean I want it to be banned. Well, I want it to be banned because i'm affected by it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manul 7,377 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 1 hour ago, iCpro said: Why Germany always gotta be so extra Bonobos it wasn't laaaahv Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 If unfavorable ideas, opinions, and conspiracies (even though some of them are disgusting and I do not agree them in any way) are going to be considered violations in Germany....it may be that Facebook will have to withdraw its service from that country. It is impossible to control and monitor every comment, especially those that fall into the area of free speech or "disgusting opinions". It may be that they have to pull their service from Germany. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goosey 3,017 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 7 hours ago, Simon said: The criminal complaint lists a series of postings which were reported to the company but were not deleted, with the complainant either being ignored or receiving a standard reply describing the post as “harmless” Spiegel reports. In October Volker Kauder said that social media giants like Facebook should face penalties if they fail to tackle hate speech, after a surge in xenophobic comments linked to the migrant influx. Kauder said that if the companies fail to remove offensive posts within a week after they have been reported, then they should be penalized, with a suggested fine of €50,000 per post. Ridiculous and horrifying, but not unexpected. If Germany wants to play thought police, Facebook should leave. "I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.