Morphine Prince 109,891 Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 24 minutes ago, LePetitMonstr said: It would be interesting to have a legal system founded on "guilty until proven innocent" That already happened in the past. They used to hang and burn people if they couldn't be proven innocent This is why the innocent until proven guilty system was created. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nafen 417 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Fay said: I did not say RT is the biggest, I said it was one of the biggest news channel in the world and that is a fact and they do not supports trump. None of my information was from conspiracy or the alt right as I dont even know what that means exactly! I dont even belong to the right or support Trump. I did not talk about Haiti because I did not have anything to say and was cornered, I talked about it because stvn insisted and asked me to show him proof of Hilary corruption. As for me being a liar about not knowing the judge system well I admitted from the beginning that I did not understand it and I asked for you to explain it to me and was open to your argument and took it into consideration in my next argument so how is this me lying and refusing to understand this?? If you dont want to argue with me or are incapable of doing so, simply ignore me or tell me you dont want to continue this argument but to act this way is just wrong. To avoid this kind of behavior, its better to just ignore certain kind of people in the future. I LOVE how you quote RT as if it's a reliable source! I mean after all it is one of YouTube's "biggest channels" ... really? I mean by those standards you should be watching PewDiePie for your news. FYI: A news anchor of theirs quit LIVE ON AIR due to the outrageous bias. Do you do any research into the sites you get your information from? RT is Russian government funded media.... You think that is credible? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferrer Zorola 3,966 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 so? did Hillary put Bill's duck inside of them? besides even if it were true Trump's still the worse option LIFE IS GOOD Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmm 879 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 34 minutes ago, ZacharyMark said: Where can I find the documents about her calling the victim names? I think you can read it starting on page 34:https://ar.scribd.com/doc/229667084/State-of-Arkansas-V-Thomas-Alfred-Taylor#fullscreen Hilary attempted to undermine the credibility of the 12 years old girl claiming this, “she is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.” She also said that the girl “has in the past made false accusations against persons, claiming they attacked her body.” Finally, Hilary wrote that a child psychologist told her that “children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” and that this tendency was especially common in children from “disorganized families” such as Shelton’s. 7 minutes ago, Nafen said: I LOVE how you quote RT as if it's a reliable source? I mean after all it is one of YouTube's "biggest channels" ... really? I mean by those standards you should be watching PewDiePie for your news. FYI: A news anchor of theirs quit LIVE ON AIR due to the outrageous bias. Do you do any research into the sites you get your information from? RT is Russian government funded media.... You think that is credible? All TV channels have anchors quitting for the same reasons and on air so this does not say anything. Also, I did not say it is a reliable source, I said it was one of the top news channels around the world as the person said I get my news from crazy conspiracy youtube channels. RT is also not a known youtube channel, its a known TV channel that has a youtube channel just like all TV channels. I never said I take my news from RT as I dont even watch TV or believe anything in the media even if it appears to be unbiased, I just happened to share a documentary from RT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nafen 417 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 7 minutes ago, Fay said: All TV channels have anchors quitting for the same reasons and on air so this does not say anything. That's a false equivalency, nice try. 7 minutes ago, Fay said: Also, I did not say it is a reliable source, I said it was one of the top news channels around the world as the person said I get my news from crazy conspiracy youtube channels. RT is also not a known youtube channel, its a known TV channel that has a youtube channel just like all TV channels. I never said I take my news from RT as I dont even watch TV or believe anything in the media even if it appears to be unbiased, I just happened to share a documentary from RT. Then why use it to try and prove some point? If I understand you correctly, you admit RT it is not credible but you still use it to support your narrative. Wow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 15 hours ago, Fay said: According to Hilary, we should always believe all rape victims.. also, many accusations were made towards bill cosby without proof yet everyone believed the victims but they dont believe Clinton victims! there is proof and real evidence that Hilary defended a pedophile against a 11 year old girl and laughed at the girl and throw away all evidence of rape. She lied about the girl and said she always make false rape claims and seeks older men because shes mentally ill! She even used to FBI to attack and threaten these women to the point where Lewinsky said that she was threatened with things I did not know was legal in America! It seems nobody has a problem or concern with any of that.. if people still want to support all that, its fine but do not ignore or deny it. It seems like to people its only rape if it benefits your political agenda. Finally somebody on this forum who has some common sense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmm 879 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Just now, Nafen said: That's a false equivalency, nice try. Then why use it to try and prove some point? If I understand you correctly you admit RT it is not credible but still use it to support your narrative. Wow. Nothing in the media is trusted but we all use articles and videos from sources we know lies about things and are biased or else, you cant find any news. I used the documentary that went to Haiti that RT used and I would use the same video if CNN or any other news channel use it. I also did not use RT only as a proof, that video was something extra to my argument. My point about RT is it is one of the top news channels in the world and it is as reliable or unreliable as other news channel.. I said this because people accused me of taking my information from the alt right trump supporting uneducated conspiracy theories channels from youtubers and thats not the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luiz 4,253 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 those women are all liars tho bitches trying to take down all famous Bills in the world leave Bill alone I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whispering 18,865 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 1 hour ago, ZacharyMark said: Where can I find the documents about her calling the victim names? In the sworn affidavit. (Not in the made up story Fay got from some Brietbart type site) That affidavit shows that other people involved in the trial, (and not Hillary) including an expert in child psychology, had said that the complainant was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing about persons, claiming they had attacked her body," and that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Clinton therefore asked the court to have the complainant undergo a psychiatric exam (at the defense's expense) to determine the validity of that information. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andres Miller 206 Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 21 hours ago, Adakam said: Then we should stop analysing the candidates by their personal lives and start thinking about what matters, their policies, and trump would destroy the country, hes not even on the same page with his VP 1 month before the election, and watching his debate he has no plans at all, he just talks about his dream results but with no idea on how to get there, Hillary has a clear plan for everything and doesnt evade any policy question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.