Trump should skip debates- Giuliani

[Lion Heart 15,041]

Donald Trump should skip the next two debates unless he gets special guarantees from the moderators, former New York mayor and top Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani told reporters after the debate.

Lester Holt, the NBC News anchor who moderated the debate, should be “ashamed of himself,” Giuliani said after the debate. He said Holt was wrong to attempt to fact-check Trump on the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk and his claimed opposition to the Iraq War.

“If I were Donald Trump I wouldn’t participate in another debate unless I was promised that the journalist would act like a journalist and not an incorrect, ignorant fact checker,” Giuliani said. “The moderator would have to promise that there would be a moderator and not a fact checker and in two particular cases an enormously ignorant, completely misinformed fact checker.”

“If you wonder why Donald Trump thinks that the press is a left-wing basically oriented group, Lester Holt proved it tonight," he added.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/giuliani-trump-debates-228756#ixzz4LUoG4zB8 
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

[Lion Heart 15,041]

Of course he doesn't want moderators to fact-check... he's afraid they'll expose Donald for the liar he is.  

 

Trump claimed he was endorsed by ICE... turns out that was misleading too: 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-presidential-debate-fact-check/2016/09/trump-misspeaks-claims-he-was-endorsed-by-ice-228732

[Gaga Monster 13,001]

He wasn't that bad

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, Gaga Monster said:

He wasn't that bad

There were some truth (Iraq war, should've taken the oil and ISIS wouldn't be where it is right now) and some nonsense (Mexico, China nonsense + he always repeats himself and has no real solutions)

[Supersonic 49,376]

I mean, he would have done the same thing to Hillary Clinton if she lied as much as Donald did.

[Pablo 8,581]

I agree about the moderator but if he can't debate how will he lead our nations with speeches and stuff?

[Goosey 3,017]

 

[Goosey 3,017]

This is from the BBC:

 

"And for the final X factor. The Lester Holt factor. Much had been made of how the NBC presenter would handle the debate and whether he would serve as a real-time fact-checker or take a more hands-off approach. One NBC staffer said Holt wouldn't be a "potted plant" - and that was definitely the case.

In all the above points, the opening for Mrs Clinton's advantage was set by the moderator. He first brought up Mr Trump's taxes. He asked about the Obama "birther" controversy. He pushed Mr Trump on the Iraq War and brought up his comment about her "look", which led to the extended discussion of presidential temperament and judgement.

Mrs Clinton's weaknesses - particularly her use of a private email server and potential conflicts of interest in her charitable foundation - were barely discussed.

If the winner of political conflict is dictated by the ground on which it is fought, then most of the debate was contested on terrain that was favourable to the Democrat.

Some of that was her own effective strategy and preparation; the lawyer's advantage. Some of it was Mr Trump's missteps and meandering; the salesman's failure to move his product.

A lot of it, however, was Holt's doing. That will have Democrats smiling and Trump supporters howling."

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37481070

 

 

[DrewStevens 5,249]

15 minutes ago, Goosey said:

 

Lol if Trump was good at debates and he wasn't a big liar he would have been fine. He lost and it was entirely his fault.

[Goosey 3,017]

3 minutes ago, DrewStevens said:

Lol if Trump was good at debates and he wasn't a big liar he would have been fine. He lost and it was entirely his fault.

[bannned 118]

31 minutes ago, Goosey said:

This is from the BBC:

 

"And for the final X factor. The Lester Holt factor. Much had been made of how the NBC presenter would handle the debate and whether he would serve as a real-time fact-checker or take a more hands-off approach. One NBC staffer said Holt wouldn't be a "potted plant" - and that was definitely the case.

In all the above points, the opening for Mrs Clinton's advantage was set by the moderator. He first brought up Mr Trump's taxes. He asked about the Obama "birther" controversy. He pushed Mr Trump on the Iraq War and brought up his comment about her "look", which led to the extended discussion of presidential temperament and judgement.

Mrs Clinton's weaknesses - particularly her use of a private email server and potential conflicts of interest in her charitable foundation - were barely discussed.

If the winner of political conflict is dictated by the ground on which it is fought, then most of the debate was contested on terrain that was favourable to the Democrat.

Some of that was her own effective strategy and preparation; the lawyer's advantage. Some of it was Mr Trump's missteps and meandering; the salesman's failure to move his product.

A lot of it, however, was Holt's doing. That will have Democrats smiling and Trump supporters howling."

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37481070

 

 

Wow the EMAILS! It doesn't matter all the **** Trump does and says on a daily basis,  because every republican will scream THE EMAILS! As if none of the other presidents in the US history didn't have information restricted from the public. Trump after the debate literally denied saying something he said 25 minutes ago. He will lie to you in the face, but God forbid the emails. Trump was certainly a complete JOKE at the debate to anyone that has any intelligence. His blind followers of course will say otherwise no matter how bad he was. Stupid likes stupid. His prostitute trophy wife he bought and his spoiled children are the epitome of everything that is bad in the US, a complete reality show. He didn't provide any answer to most of the questions n, he would wander around in other topics and just say "there will be more jobs, more jobs, there will be more jobs". 

I'm not saying Hillary is a good candidate, but compared to Trump she is infinitely more capable.

[AlphaMonster 1,806]

Lester Holt is a registered republican though 

Even funnier, they still think democrats are left-wing  They would think half of european ruling parties as pure bred communists then. 

[Goosey 3,017]

20 minutes ago, AlphaMonster said:

They would think half of european ruling parties to be pure bred communists then. 

They do 

[Adakam 2]

Hahahahahaha! Classic "moderator was unfair" excuse, donald couldnt handle the debate, period

[Morphine Prince 109,655]

Poor Donald Duck is a horrible debater. That's the truth. I hate Giuliani with a passion.