Michelle 2,056 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 1 hour ago, CowSiss said: You're right, if Gaga really wanted an indie release, she would pull a Miley and release a "Stefani Germanotta & Ha Dead Monsterz" which, because of contractual obligations, would not get Gaga her coins. Still waiting for to do something along the lines of "I Sit on Acid": Lords of acid I LOVE them.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Temptation 11,209 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 Gaga is too pop for pop, too art for the art crowd, and too indie to be indie. It's what happens when you're a genius. Everyone tries to pin you down. Everyone gets hurt that you're beyond a straightforward definition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenji 90 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 zzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenji 90 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Free My Mind said: y'all are taking it too literal what it means is she's gonna be taking a lot more of a "relaxed" and "cool" approach to promoting the record. She doesn't want to be in everyones face with it, let the music do the talking and all that. Indie artists are a lot free-er than popstars, because they don't have the pressure of the charts - this is something I think Gaga has been jealous of in the past. A fan that did understand it.....Congrats! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenji 90 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 38 minutes ago, Lord Temptation said: Gaga is too pop for pop, too art for the art crowd, and too indie to be indie. It's what happens when you're a genius. Everyone tries to pin you down. Everyone gets hurt that you're beyond a straightforward definition. Exactly this! A Genius ! And the worst is that Gaga has the half of her fanbase supporting her and the other half judging her for not releasing another Bad Romance(......not even a BTW...something from the past) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaterium 220 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 I don't see it, girl Well I do, but she will still go down in music history as one of the biggest pop voices of the 2000s-2010s. Culturally, she will never be indie. But musically, she can totally do that. BUY APPLAUSE ON ITUNES Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzr 1,586 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 3 hours ago, Free My Mind said: y'all are taking it too literal what it means is she's gonna be taking a lot more of a "relaxed" and "cool" approach to promoting the record. She doesn't want to be in everyones face with it, let the music do the talking and all that. Indie artists are a lot free-er than popstars, because they don't have the pressure of the charts - this is something I think Gaga has been jealous of in the past. This! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurk 410 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 A lot of people use the term indie for pretty much anything that isn't Pure Pop or Pure Rock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KURUSHITOVSKA 20,451 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 There's a difference between Indie sound and Indie artist. ¿Qué currículum tiene ésta tarántula? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucastecala 795 Posted September 20, 2016 Share Posted September 20, 2016 6 hours ago, giskardsb said: You guys are taking a hearsay comment way too seriously. this! Nobody ever confirmed thar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.