Right Promotes Harrasment Ad Featuring Trump Compilation: VIDEO

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

 

Infighting is funny.

[PERFECTIONIST 2,139]

idk why he comes for anyone when he looks like a melted chucky doll that got peroxide in his hair

[HEARTHUNTER 7,611]

Pidgeons flock together as they say  

[Didymus 34,380]

The Joan Rivers of politics.

Most of his statements there aren't even bad but ok.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

6 minutes ago, Didymus said:

The Joan Rivers of politics.

Most of his statements there aren't even bad but ok.

Kidding right?

Almost all of the first half of the video constituted harassment or misogyny in one form or another.

Even the innocuous ones like talking about someone's chest are hilarious. Is that the kind of person you would want representing you? He has no restraint.

----

In any case this is a video from the GOP, so hell if I care how biased it is. They're ripping each other apart  

[AJH219 4,448]

9 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

Kidding right?

Almost all of these constituted harassment or misogyny in one form or another.

Even the innocuous ones like talking about someone's chest is hilarious. Is that the kind of person you would want representing you? He has no restraint.

----

In any case this is a video from the GOP, so hell if I care how biased it is. They're ripping each other apart  

This guy is a Democrat though, its still a great "attack" ad regardless

[Didymus 34,380]

1 minute ago, LebaneseDude said:

Kidding right?

Almost all of these constituted harassment or misogyny in one form or another.

Even the innocuous ones like talking about someone's chest is hilarious. Is that the kind of person you would want representing you? He has no restraint.

The bad ones:

"I'd look her right in that fat ugly face of hers"

"face of a dog"

The rest would've been ok in any other context than this one, so I don't find it necessary to call that harrassment. I don't want him to represent me, but I don't see how I implied that or how that matters in this thread Well, I do, because you make these threads to blast Hillary rivals, but still, it shouldn't matter in relation to my post.

What can I say, I enjoy freedom of speech. If people can't handle it, then they should stop caring about what he says. I have a quite deep hatred for people who genuinely think silencing people based on the tired old "you just don't say that" (in this day and age? really?) non-argument, while then advocating freedom of speech on another post on Facebook. The two can't co-exist. Ever.

I'm not supporting his statements and I would take an issue with them and let that affect the way I treated this man, but who cares about actually giving what he says a platform and circlejerk about it, honestly.

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

Just now, AJH219 said:

This guy is a Democrat though 

Oh right I had my info mixed up.

The ones promoting it are the GOP. The far right commentator Erick Erickson is giving it exposure.

[JbGaga 2,261]

15 minutes ago, Didymus said:

The Joan Rivers of politics.

Most of his statements there aren't even bad but ok.

Man i miss Joan...  I wounder if she would vote for Trump... She really liked him and she is the first celebrity apprentice

[LebaneseDude 6,146]

8 minutes ago, Didymus said:

The bad ones:

"I'd look her right in that fat ugly face of hers"

"face of a dog"

The rest would've been ok in any other context than this one, so I don't find it necessary to call that harrassment. I don't want him to represent me, but I don't see how I implied that or how that matters in this thread Well, I do, because you make these threads to blast Hillary rivals, but still, it shouldn't matter in relation to my post.

What can I say, I enjoy freedom of speech. If people can't handle it, then they should stop caring about what he says. I have a quite deep hatred for people who genuinely think silencing people based on the tired old "you just don't say that" (in this day and age? really?) non-argument, while then advocating freedom of speech on another post on Facebook. The two can't co-exist. Ever.

I'm not supporting his statements and I would take an issue with them and let that affect the way I treated this man, but who cares about actually giving what he says a platform and circlejerk about it, honestly.

When questioned about Megyn Kelly and her posing actually tough questions in a debate: Blood coming out of her wherever.

When talking to a male contestant, made gestures towards female contestant and said: It's a pretty picture for you to drop on your knees.

Talking to a reporter: You wouldn't have your job if you weren't beautiful

----

The rest are discussing women in a very caveman way, and someone who speaks so liberally about women's female anatomies on air is clearly not someone with restraint.

All of these are super old, before he ran for presidency. He has even more now. This speaks of his character so much. Freedom of speech is fine. It doesn't make what you say any less potentially insulting or demeaning.

----

Anyway this wasn't me giving him a platform. The GOP is circulating this. What's funnier is that it was done by a Democrat. I don't get why you feel compelled to defend him. Let them destroy each other 

 

 

[SychosSoChic 9,995]

All I'm saying is, if you want my support I need to see more than just you comparing yourself to someone else by putting them in an obvious bad light and you in a good light with your floppy kids.

I would have been more impressed had he made his photo a professional one and a quote from one of his own interviews that back up his values. I'm not gonna side for a family album photo

That being said, I'm here for a younger senator, especially a democratic one!

Spoiler

Am I the only one who can't look at politics the same way, after watching House of Cards? Like I live in fear of some of the Hilary stans getting pushed in front of an oncoming train by Bernie (someone gif it)

 

[AJH219 4,448]

Freedom of speech is never an excuse to act like an asshole. People who abuse it deserve to be punished, tbh. 

[Didymus 34,380]

8 minutes ago, LebaneseDude said:

I don't get why you feel compelled to defend him.

That's not what I did. I just said it wasn't harrassment (you seriously wanna compare that to someone crossing the line of making statements and systematically trying to damage someone's well-being?) and that I think it's ludicrous that people want to waste their time calling for this guy to be silenced or punished while those same people hold freedom of speech as one of the reasons we've transcended barbarism, whatever that might be.

That is all.

[Didymus 34,380]

4 minutes ago, AJH219 said:

Freedom of speech is never an excuse to act like an asshole.

A freedom of speech that involves the possibility of being punished for what you say is not a construct that withstands the most basic analysis. Either stop believing in freedom of speech or don't impinge on someone's freedom.

[AJH219 4,448]

3 minutes ago, Didymus said:

A freedom of speech that involves the possibility of being punished for what you say is not a construct that withstands the most basic analysis. Either stop believing in freedom of speech or don't impinge on someone's freedom.

Put like that, I guess I only support freedom of speech when its applicable to something I want hear. Which is absolutely hypocritical, but oh well.