youandi 2,110 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 18 minutes ago, ryanripley said: and how well did that album do? jk but seriously, when it comes to ARTPOP, the design is more understandable as a rule breaker since that was the album was, almost like the Dadaism movement. she was putting the ART first, trying to make ARTPOP a movement, style and message in itself Hide contents i hope that designer got fired too the message of ARTPOP as a whole (and the movement it could HAVE been) can excuse the lack of design rules but at least it didn't have a gradient fill That designer? Jeff Koons? Just because you do a course on graphics doesn't mean you know exactly what makes a good cover. It's all down to opinion, surely? I don't mean to sound bitchy by the way, it just reminds me of a friend I have who takes music technology. She's always saying how most song are bad down to poor production, even though they're clearly made to sound that way. She thinks that because she's learnt about how different tracks are layered together, that's how it should always be Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James19709 456 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 Christ no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryanripley 86,575 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, youandi said: That designer? Jeff Koons? Just because you do a course on graphics doesn't mean you know exactly what makes a good cover. It's all down to opinion, surely? I don't mean to sound bitchy by the way, it just reminds me of a friend I have who takes music technology. She's always saying how most song are bad down to poor production, even though they're clearly made to sound that way. She thinks that because she's learnt about how different tracks are layered together, that's how it should always be Jeff Koons designed the whole album cover? i thought he was responsible for the sculpture and blue ball but there are rules to good design and there are certain things that come together to create great design. you could say it comes down to opinion but if you really look into it, it becomes obvious what is and is not good. you can't just throw out a piece of text here, some photography there and maybe a lens flare () and state "well i think it's good", the design world doesn't work like that and if it was Jeff Koons that did it all/ the most part, it would certainly explain the artistic approach as opposed to a design approach, which i said before, does work with ARTPOP and it's sort of "anti" message. Spoiler goodbye koons https://goo.gl/xMgMvJ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hexxx 2,244 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 looks more like a Mixtape cover. I think it would look better with a filter Lady Gaga/ Madonna/Lana /Azealia Banks/ Jazmine Sullivan/ DEEE-LITE/ Moko Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRILL MONSTER 1,113 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 I actually would like it it's very roisin murphy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven 5,849 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 Maybe more something like this? http://imgur.com/KmyV22G Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaney 5,515 Posted April 3, 2016 Author Share Posted April 3, 2016 3 minutes ago, Steven said: Maybe more something like this? http://imgur.com/KmyV22G it's okay... I still think it would look better zoomed all the way out. This version would still be good but I don't like the red filter and the giant lady gaga.... it should say LadyGaga where it says Explicit Beauty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
REALITY 75,696 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 Maybe? It could be a really iconic album cover, and as @Strigoi mentioned, it kind of reminds me of Abbey Road, which is one of the most iconic album covers of all time. Personally, though, I'd maybe change the outfit. 🦠🧙♀️🥀📸🎉👻🕺🧟💊💖☎️🔪👤🐺🌱🌎 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vanus 6,083 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 9 hours ago, ryanripley said: i want to say yes but the graphic designer in me says no for three main reasons: 1. there's no title so no information for the GP/newbies to recognise what album it is 2. lady gaga (and other very popular artists) can get away with this but there's no artist name 3. that outfit and look has a much better scenery out there to go with it. if this was album cover potential, i know there's a place out there that contrasts more beautifully ever since i started graphic design i can't help but see the good, the bad and the ugly um adeles 25 cover says hi, sold so many and has nothing on it but her face imma cut a bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryanripley 86,575 Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 1 hour ago, vanus said: um adeles 25 cover says hi, sold so many and has nothing on it but her face because it's adele if you don't know who adele is, you have to be totally disconnected from society lmao, she's already an artist that can get away with no name and no title, literally everyone knows and recognises her now thats slayage just think, if she hadn't of had 2 hugely successful albums before that, and she went with just the face and no info, it would either be a bit of a shitstorm like "who is she?! whats her name?!" or nothing at all cus theres no info to spread... because it's just her face https://goo.gl/xMgMvJ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.