Should Gaga release the lead single of LG5 exclusively on Apple Music?

[RAMROD 110,382]

I am more inclined for her to sell the album exclusively for a week on iTunes before the CD drop by the next week, like Drake, Beyoncé and recentlt, Future.

That way she can drop the album altogether to all around the world seamlessly.

[Mr Ricky 9,061]

Can we just stay off the streaming-whatever-kind-of-new-thing-mess? 

I want her to release an album just like an album should be released. Physically and digitally. No need to hit for exclusive members yadiyadiya. 

[GawdGa 1,399]

no, that would lower sales

but if she do, im bout to buy a apple music subscription before i take my next breath 

[Bad Bromance 5,809]

I don't think this would be a good idea at all.  Her sales would suffer with this type of exclusive deal.

 

 

 

[Alfonso 1,551]

No, we need sales 

[Wolf 1,328]

No exclusives!! Everything needs to be accessible, so that illegal downloads can be decreased.

It should be released on all sorts of platforms, streaming services, and have physical copies at the same time. I mean, it's better than releasing it exclusively and forcing everybody to torrent it.

[Guest]

Absolutely not. I said it in another thread, but she needs to have her next album as available as possible. No exclusives, no surprise digital releases, and no holding it off of streaming services. She's gaining her popularity back, but she's not back at a level in the pop world where she can pull something like Beyoncé or Adele just yet. She needs to make sure as many people can hear her music as possible. The more people have access to it, the more successful the album will be in terms of sales and popularity.

If anything were an Apple Music exclusive, it should only be promo singles. The lead and second singles (if the second one is put out before the album) should be released everywhere, digitally at least.

[Ferrer Zorola 3,966]

Should Katy Perry release an experimental album?

...

Exactly. 

[Twitter 14]

2 hours ago, GloZell Green said:

No, wouldn't that lower sales?

This! 

[Infinity Wave 7,635]

Honestly I don't see any actual reason for doing that, I mean not everyone has Apple Music and not everyone can afford to pay it, and also not everyone uses ITunes...

I personally think she should upload the album on YouTube like BTW and like some other recent albums (like Sia's one), it would be great. But you know as far as she releases it I don't really care how it is released ahah

[SISTERV 3,887]

No because I'm sick of artists in general being so extra about promotion. Release the damn music and the music speak for itself.

Tired of pop singers thinking they are Bill Gates and attempting to get everyone to buy into side projects rather than the music itself.

[SamJ 8,008]

No I don't have apple music

[Lucas 27,450]

Hell no!

[Diamond Heart 4,400]

No i hate these stupid exclusive deals. 
Make your music available for everyone, as an artist who creates something, that should be important. 

One of the reasons i hate these exclusivity deals is because its usually for a streaming service, lets use TIDAL and Kanyes new album as an example. Instead of expecting people to pay a one off price for a physical of digital copy, they are expecting people to pay 9.99 a month for the rest of their lives and when they stop paying, the album isnt available to them anymore. Its bullshit and money hungry and i dont give a **** about millionaire artists whining about how they dont get enough money. 

[monketsharona 84,698]

No..

It would mean flop