Wild 1,296 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Overhyped. Nothing new or unimaginable. you didn't touch the world in new ways Gaga. This is why I prefer we aren't told about things in advance. She did well but it really didn't feel that special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SummerGirl21 787 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 she sounded amazing. this performance was for Bowie. haters need to stop. seriously. stop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
yxi 4,999 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Sorry but i didn't like the performance.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloody Matt 5,357 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 I'm sorry. I should watch the entire thing before judging. Any good links? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfMark 4,277 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Yeah ive turned the grammys off. im over it. -Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coop 15,354 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 “Lady Gaga had been speaking to Intel as early as September, brainstorming ways in which she could use technology to express herself in a way that had never been done before,” explained Paul Tapp, Intel’s director of technology, by phone last week. “She’s an amazing dancer and she really pushes boundaries with fashion. She said, ‘Help me to go beyond these standard constraints.’” So, this past fall, a team of engineers began working on the technology that Gaga envisioned using. But when Bowie passed in early January, Gaga began re-imagining her multi-media performance as a tribute to the icon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyaKara 2,281 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 What if Gaga/Intel are going to surprise us with something else later on? It's the only way to explain it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien Tulip 12,428 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 17 minutes ago, PMKKARDASHiAN said: I must be the only one who really didn't care for it I liked it but I was underwhelmed and this time it was Intel overhyping it. It seems like Gagas career has a lot of holes of canceled plans and projects. I cant wait til Lady Gaga performs Lady Gaga songs again. I just hope no more performances or original concepts get canceled again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juanjo 2,151 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 That was spectacular, as I knew it would be. Gaga did amaaaazing! Those vocals and moves! But, unfortunately, intel overhyped. I think the technology, in this case, though, shined more live than through the TV screen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bebe 17,094 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 I cannot believe at ALL that you people are bashing this performance? It's one of her greatest performances of all time PERIOD. It was incredible! The beginning with the projections on her face was magical, the costume changes were soooo bowie, the dancing keyboard and microphone was super cool, the projections of her onto the screen was fantastic and her voice and choreography was amazing. What else could you have wanted from this performance? I'm in shock that people are criticising this as underwhelming - especially on the technological front when the technology used in this performance (Whether it be the projections on her moving face, the keyboard and microphone dancing in sync with when Gaga needed to sing or the rings that caused the projection of her body onto the screen) was insane! This was absolutely phenomenal on all fronts. Truly spectacular and a fantastic tribute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shipper 13,078 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Let us not be bitter and ungrateful little monsters. Be thankful for what was served. Anybody with a decent link though? Maybe I can blame the laggy live stream. Because I have not seen the full performance and most of it was lagging. 🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmm 879 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 How long was the performance? didnt they say 15 minutes or something? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry 26,836 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 Tbh the performance was great for what it was, but Intel did overhype it with the "everything will change", "something nobody has ever witnessed before" etc. But I guess Intel already paid for their commercials and whatnot so it all had to stay. All that stuff was clearly not geared towards Bowie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 11,553 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 She was great and seved a lot of energy. intel on the other hand was dissapointing. Other than the intro with the face effects and the robotic piano it was pretty meh YES she started working with them before bowie died, but intel shouldnt have hyped the **** out of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manyatyau 262 Posted February 16, 2016 Share Posted February 16, 2016 well, gaga actually created that stage LIVE. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.