Jump to content
celeb

Nicki Minaj Bails Rapist/Pedo Brother From Jail


SissyFromSpace

Featured Posts

SissyFromSpace

1204-nicki-minaj-jelani-maraj-tmz-instag

Nicki Minaj stepped up to bail out her brother Jelani Maraj ... after his arrest for raping a preteen.

Nicki put a $100,000 bond to get Maraj out of jail Friday in Nassau County, NY. He stands accused of first degree rape and first degree s-xual conduct with a 12-year-old.

http://www.tmz.com/2015/12/05/nicki-minaj-bail-brother-arrest-rape/#ixzz3tSX6ygmF

Barbie elitist - Weaboo - Sissy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Haroon

If someone's been accused but not proven guilty then I don't think it's wrong for a family member to bail them out, I mean a family member's gonna obviously keep hope that it didn't actually happen so it kinda makes sense :/ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Katharine Hepburn

How certain are we that he's guilty? If he's clearly guilty and Nicki is doing this for him I have no respect for her.

xoxo Joanne
Link to post
Share on other sites

TEANUS
Just now, Haroon said:

If someone's been accused but not proven guilty then I don't think it's wrong for a family member to bail them out, I mean a family member's gonna obviously keep hope that it didn't actually happen so it kinda makes sense :/ 

This, but since it's related to Nicki everyone will jump on the hate train :neyde:

British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwontell

Well, so far it's just an accusation...let's see if there's proof and a condemnation first.

Like, this situation must REALLY suck for her... it's a heinous crime, sure, but it's her brother...I mean, is she supposed to completely ignore him? What if it turns out he's innocent? Most people would do the same in her place, I guess...

Besides, bailing someone does not mean they won't be punished, it only means that until there's a sentence certificating that they really did commit a crime, they won't stay in jail...after he's condemned, it's a whole different story...

ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobster
23 minutes ago, Haroon said:

If someone's been accused but not proven guilty then I don't think it's wrong for a family member to bail them out, I mean a family member's gonna obviously keep hope that it didn't actually happen so it kinda makes sense :/ 

It makes sense for the family member... It absolutely doesn't make sense for a legal system... Does that mean that someone else, who doesn't have a rich hip-hop/popstar as a sister should be treated differently if not proven guilty? If they don't know if he's guilty, why should they be paying 100 000$ to get him out, it makes no sense :huh:

EDIT: Don't quote me, someone just explained it to me

But I'm only a man and I do what I can.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Evan Peters
1 minute ago, HMLSwine said:

It makes sense for the family member... It absolutely doesn't make sense for a legal system... Does that mean that someone else, who doesn't have a rich hip-hop/popstar as a sister should be treated differently if not proven guilty? If they don't know if he's guilty, why should they be paying 100 000$ to get him out, it makes no sense :huh:

what does her being a pop-star have to do with anything. this is how it works. you can be bailed out because you're innocent until proven guilty. you can't be charged with whatever you were accused of doing because police officers are not a judge nor a jury. obviously she's going to bail him out, he's her brother. and obviously she's going to take no time in doing so because 100K to nicki minaj is nothing. yes, for celebrities/people with family connections, it's easier to get out, but im assuming you think that he's only getting bailed out bc he's family. which isn't the case, you can be bailed out whether you're rich or not because they can't prove what you were accused of unless you go on trial. this isn't a case of nepotism, it's a case of how the law works. 

emma roberts is an abuser
Link to post
Share on other sites

Florian
1 minute ago, HMLSwine said:

It makes sense for the family member... It absolutely doesn't make sense for a legal system... Does that mean that someone else, who doesn't have a rich hip-hop/popstar as a sister should be treated differently if not proven guilty? If they don't know if he's guilty, why should they be paying 100 000$ to get him out, it makes no sense :huh:

Bail are like this. If the accusations aren't strong enough you can bail. If you have money it's easy, you get out until the court judgement, if you don't have money, you can do loans or ask for money to specific groups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobster
16 minutes ago, Evan Peters said:

what does her being a pop-star have to do with anything. this is how it works. you can be bailed out because you're innocent until proven guilty. you can't be charged with whatever you were accused of doing because police officers are not a judge nor a jury. obviously she's going to bail him out, he's her brother. and obviously she's going to take no time in doing so because 100K to nicki minaj is nothing. yes, for celebrities/people with family connections, it's easier to get out, but im assuming you think that he's only getting bailed out bc he's family. which isn't the case, you can be bailed out whether you're rich or not because they can't prove what you were accused of unless you go on trial. this isn't a case of nepotism, it's a case of how the law works. 

I was talking about rich people in general, in this case a hip-hop/popstar ... When did I blame Nicki for this? I'm talking about how something like this is even possible?

"It's a case of how the law works" is exactly what I'm criticizing

EDIT: Don't quote me, someone just explained it to me

But I'm only a man and I do what I can.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwontell

Btw, I'd throw an "alleged" in the tittle of this topic...just in case...

ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
15 minutes ago, Haroon said:

If someone's been accused but not proven guilty then I don't think it's wrong for a family member to bail them out, I mean a family member's gonna obviously keep hope that it didn't actually happen so it kinda makes sense :/ 

Exactly this. Was he actually convicted of the crime?

die with a skip🧍‍♂️
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mobster
5 minutes ago, Florian said:

Bail are like this. If the accusations aren't strong enough you can bail. If you have money it's easy, you get out until the court judgement, if you don't have money, you can do loans or ask for money to specific groups.

And isn't that depressing? We don't know if he's innocent, but he'll face no consequences, because someone in his family happens to have money... If the legal system were about actual justice, he wouldn't get a different treatment than someone without the money... 

But I'm only a man and I do what I can.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...