Guest Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 this. Is the review fake or were just calling him a troll cause the review was negative?I read that it was official on that thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djBuffoon 11,967 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 I read that it was official on that thread99% sure it was official. He mentioned a lot of specific details that, if they're accurate, one would only know if they saw the first episode. Doesn't explain why he said Max Greenfield wasn't in the episode when he apparently is tho... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Monster Kid 13,140 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 The first review could be fake. The negative one mentions Basset being one of the characters not in the first episode. The review in this thread mentions Bassett being sensational in the first episode. So it's fake or one of the reviewers has no idea what Angela Bassett looks like. So what is the truth? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter 3,640 Posted October 4, 2015 Author Share Posted October 4, 2015 The first review could be fake. The negative one mentions Basset being one of the characters not in the first episode. The review in this thread mentions Bassett being sensational in the first episode. So it's fake or one of the reviewers has no idea what Angela Bassett looks like. So what is the truth? I think i'll go with the positive one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgusPop 4,064 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 YASSSSSSSSS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chic 20,830 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 The first review could be fake. The negative one mentions Basset being one of the characters not in the first episode. The review in this thread mentions Bassett being sensational in the first episode. So it's fake or one of the reviewers has no idea what Angela Bassett looks like. So what is the truth? Isn't Angela Bassett supposed to show up for the first time in episode three? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tresor 1,649 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 The first review could be fake. The negative one mentions Basset being one of the characters not in the first episode. The review in this thread mentions Bassett being sensational in the first episode. So it's fake or one of the reviewers has no idea what Angela Bassett looks like. So what is the truth? He also said max greenfield wasnt in it, and according to multiple of the actors - he has a really messed up scene right in the beginning of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter 3,640 Posted October 4, 2015 Author Share Posted October 4, 2015 Yasss Executive Editor, TV for Variety. Debra Birnbaum @debrabirnbaum Let's just say she's bloody brilliant. :) And I saw the episode after the red carpet. No spoilers, but I will say her first scene with Matt Bomer doesn't disappoint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter 3,640 Posted October 4, 2015 Author Share Posted October 4, 2015 They saw the episode after the red carpet so the review that was written before the RC is probably fake Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enhsa 2,043 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Yass Queen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 They saw the episode after the red carpet so the review that was written before the RC is probably fake but why some critic would write a fake article? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTraumatica 5,786 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 but why some attention *****s would write a fake article? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Monster Kid 13,140 Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 but why some critic would write a fake article?and it's on the website for the SF chronicle. It seems odd to make up so many details about the premiere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter 3,640 Posted October 4, 2015 Author Share Posted October 4, 2015 but why some critic would write a fake article? Because he is a medonster or he delivered a clickbait mess. Or both Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 and it's on the website for the SF chronicle. It seems odd to make up so many details about the premiere. yes, that's why it's unlikely fake..no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.