Yanko 9,860 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 It is a collaborative album between Lady Gaga and Tony Bennett but it is huge enough to be considered a major Lady Gaga album in my opinion.its not gagas solo record#LG5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 11,363 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 its not gagas solo record#LG5 exactly, thats why we should start a separed album count for jazz records only Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley 59,023 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 agreed but its not pop, i think we should start a jazz album count just like the pop ones. like keep them organized and separetlyNo music is music. They shouldn't be categorized into different groups. Gaga might as well make another rock album and we would have to start a new group again if she does so.It's not like Taylor divided two categories for her albums, one for country albums one for pop albums. So Gaga shouldn't do so either. Jazz or pop, they are studio albums coming from Gaga herself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 11,363 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 "TFM, it really was my second album" - Gaga on Kiss 92.5 interview "Interscope didn´t want to put an album for me right away" - GAGA "a number 1 in canada after 4 RECORDS you still like me!" Gaga on kiss 92.5 CASE CLOSED! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 11,363 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 No music is music. They shouldn't be categorized into different groups. Gaga might as well make another rock album and we would have to start a new group again if she does so.It's not like Taylor divided two categories for her albums, one for country albums one for pop albums. So Gaga shouldn't do so either. Jazz or pop, they are studio albums coming from Gaga herself.never though about it like that. if that were the case then yes, it shouldnt be separated, but its a duet album with Tony so that is good enough reason for me to separate them. i just like how TB+LG1 sounds. besides it acknowledges tony too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hodori 10 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 lol always fun to read peoples opinions on this. in my opinion, who cares what others classify what as, if you got your own system then good enough. don't need to preach towards others to follow your opinions in this casethis may help clarify some things with some people out there (yes, its wikipedia, but still has some info that may help clarify some things)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_play"According to Recording Industry Association of America, an EP is defined as 3-5 songs OR under 30 minutes, whereas a single is allowed to contain up to 4 songs" so... the fame monster has 8 songs, 3-5 more than an EP, AND (not or) it times to be around 36 minutes (rough guess from my memory), around 5-6 minutes longer than an EP, so with that being said, and Gaga herself saying its a stand alone album (don't let the title of "the fame" attached on it fool ya! although its sort of a cool concept that it does sorta bounce off from there to create some continuity while being seperate) and with the whole different concept from the fame with 4 singles in total wordwide (bad romance, telephone, alejandro, dance in the dark in some regions) i think it's safe to say it's an album. cherrytree sessions, very gaga holiday, all include no more than 4 songs and are less than 20 minutes therefore are only considered EP's and not full albums for me, cheek to cheek isn't one of her official studio albums in her repertoire, but sort of a special/inbetween album like they do in korea (being korean, i'm accustomed to .5/special albums such as remix albums, cover albums, duet albums) as there's still a few songs that doesn't include her at all, so she's still sharing the album role with tony bennett. yes its an official studio album, but just makes more sense for me to consider it a side album. to each their own Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flopheart 1,865 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I consider The Fame Monster as a real album, sorry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartySick 159,824 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 That's like Pretty Girls is not one of Britney's main singles because it's classified as "Britney Spears & Iggy Azalea". Nah. As long as she's a LEAD on the album, then it's one of her main albums, regardless of who is with her on the title. OHMYGOD THANK YOU. I always fail to see how people can say Cheek to Cheek isn't part of her main discography just because it's with Tony. It's part of both their discographies, not a new one called "LGTB"...It has more tracks than two of her previous albums, an era that's gone on for longer than a year, won a Grammy, and has a sold out tour ending tomorrow. "It's not a main album, it's a side project" Sure, Jan. OT: LG1 The FameLG2 The Fame MonsterLG3 Born This WayLG4 ARTPOPLG5 Cheek to CheekLG6 ???????? nobody gives a **** what monsters or gaga consider it, it was released as an EP AND THAT ALL IT MATTERS. By industry standards The Fame Monster is a stand alone album, even though it did expand on The Fame. An EP (3-5 tracks) is the next step up from a single (1-3 tracks) which makes The Fame Monster (8 tracks) an album (6+ tracks). Heated moment over 🌸Flourishing and vibrant🌼 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustPokeHerFace 2,564 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I've said this before. It's her 4th solo LPIt's her 5th LPAnd it's her 6th era I'm just going to call it her next album until we get the title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giorno Giovanna 3,178 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 このジョルノジョヴァンナ夢がある Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forslayage 676 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 "I really didn't intend to write a new ALBUM at all" it's LG5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GloZell Green 11,723 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 This again Can we just call it "Lady Gagas next album"... Please? (can someone lock this) Lady Gaga | Shakira Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsches 17,392 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 It's annoying to call it "LG" in general Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hexxx 2,244 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 It's the 5th body of work in her discography Lady Gaga/ Madonna/Lana /Azealia Banks/ Jazmine Sullivan/ DEEE-LITE/ Moko Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RegiRey 443 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 No one agrees with you hunty..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.