bayonse 6,525 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Do u think that her label told her to speak more for the gay rights and create a gay anthem?I believe that her words about the gay rights are honest but i have the feeling that her label forced her to worship the gays so they can buy her music. Its a very common thing in this industry especially when the artist is trying to sell more musicWhat do u think? no more parties in LA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariomania1234 11,368 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 She's not a puppet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OBEY 57,109 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 yes,deep down, i think she's homophobic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klou 2,414 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Even if she was, I don't care. What matters is that it's obvious that she cares NOW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bayonse 6,525 Posted May 18, 2015 Author Share Posted May 18, 2015 She's not a puppet.but she was in the beginningevery newcomer is a puppet no more parties in LA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,796 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I really doubt that Lose control. Let go and fall. Do you get the satisfaction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfNena 1,712 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vernier 3,786 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 Obviously. But then they stopped buying ha albums, so now she doesn't care "Gay marriage, pfft the flops didn't even buy ARTPOP, they don't deserve rights" Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mariomania1234 11,368 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 but she was in the beginningevery newcomer is a puppetWell I respectfully disagree. She would never fake something like that and then go on to dedicate an entire album campaign around it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeoFameMonster 1,592 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 No way!! that would be career suicide and if she was not so talented she would have been forgotten and dropped.Sticking up for the gays would be a really bad move but she did it anyway because she was disgusted by the level of homophobia and violence towards gay people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelgreenstein 0 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I really doubt it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Gaga 22,920 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 I want to think that no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatelynnMarie 4,406 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swan Heart 7,382 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 No, not at all..I'm pretty sure they were actually against her being 'too gay'.. They say it's the last song. They don't know us, you see. It's only the last song if we let it be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoxo cupcakke 4,781 Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 TBH, I think her label was against Gaga trying for the gays in the beginning of her career but after the success of The Fame Monster, they saw that a bunch of Little Monsters were LGBTThen, they just let Gaga do her thing with Born This Way and they tried to control her messages during the ARTPOP era Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.