Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
lgbt

Conservative scholars: Legalizing same-sex marriage will cause 900,000 abortions


Morphine Prince

Featured Posts

Morphine Prince

 

As the Supreme Court prepares to take up same-s-x marriage next week, conservative scholars have produced a last-ditch argument to keep the scourge of homos-xual unions from spreading across the land: Gay marriage kills.

They’re saying that legalizing same-s-x marriage will cause 900,000 abortions.

The logic is about as obvious as if they had alleged that raising the minimum wage would increase the frequency of hurricanes. If anything, you’d think that more same-s-x marriages would mean more adoptions.

But comes now Gene Schaerr, unsuccessful lawyer for Utah in that state’s case against same-s-x marriages, to file an amicus brief with the Supreme Court on behalf of “100 scholars of marriage.”

“On the surface, abortion and same-s-x marriage may seem unrelated,” Schaerr acknowledged in a post on the Heritage Foundation Web site in advance of a presentation he made to the conservative think tank Monday. But “the two are closely linked in a short and simple causal chain.”

To wit: Legalizing same-s-x marriage devalues marriage and causes fewer heteros-xual couples to marry, which leads to a larger number of unmarried women, who have abortions at higher rates than married women. As a result, Schaerr wrote, “nearly 900,000 more children of the next generation would be aborted as a result of their mothers never marrying. This is equal to the entire population of the cities of Sacramento and Atlanta combined.”

Case closed! Or at least it would be, if Schaerr’s “causal chain” were real. He freely acknowledged that he had no cause-and-effect proof when I asked him about it at Heritage on Monday.

 “It is still too new to do a rigorous causation a--lysis using statistical methods,” he admitted, saying that he had found only a decline in marriage rates in states that had legalized same-s-x marriage (in fact, marriage rates have declined overall). “The brief doesn’t even attempt to say conclusively that this reduction in marriage rates has been the result of adopting same-s-x marriage,” Schaerr said, though there are “theoretical reasons” such causation might occur.

Full story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-new-argument-against-gay-equality-same-s-x-marriage-kills/2015/04/20/9fc509d4-e7a3-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html?tid=HP_opinion?tid=HP_opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

Katsuki Bakugo

why so specific...

If All You Ever Do Is Look Down On People, You Won't Be Able To Recognize Your Own Weaknesses.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Iwontell

There's nothing worse than ppl trying to make their irrational views seem rational...

ATTENTION: (bad) jokes and sarcasm are still a thing, so don't take everything I say literally. Thank you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Child

"On the surface, abortion and same-s-x marriage may seem unrelated,"

They are unrelated :awkney:

‘If religion be the cause of disunity, then irreligion is surely to be preferred.’ ‘Abdu’l-Bahá
Link to post
Share on other sites

ThisGuyTony

 

Legalizing same-s-x marriage devalues marriage and causes fewer heteros-xual couples to marry

What kind of nonsense is this? :lolly: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad Bromance

This is the biggest crock of **** I've heard in my life!  Who in their right mind would even fathom to rationalize that the legalization of same-s-x marriages would have anything to do with the other???  Like, what the actual ****??!!   :grr:

I don't care what you think about unless it is about me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dangerous Man

What kind of logic is that? It's like saying ARTPOP underperformed because Gaga broke her hip.

"A little less conversation and a little more touch my body."
Link to post
Share on other sites

LoveandMagic

​Conservative "scholars." :sharon:

If marriage is so damn sacred (by the way it was originally designed as a sort of contract - like buying cattle) then why do so many conservatives get divorced? And they do realize "Traditional" marriage involved the man buying as many wives as he could, as well as having s-x with his slaves (often rape) and concubines (another word for s-x slaves). I guess that's what happens when you de-fund educational programs and fail History 101.

Just repeat to yourself, "It's just a show. I should really just relax."
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lion Heart

He also speculated that an unemployed man who got his girlfriend pregnant in a state that had legalized same-s-x marriage would be more likely to conclude that “I’m not going to assume these obligations to this woman and this child.”

Wait, what?

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...