Jump to content

Returning Islamist fighters offered‘jihadi rehab’- UK


Luiz

Featured Posts

Returning Islamist fighters offered ‘jihadi rehab’ instead of prosecution for supporting blood-thirsty terrorist groups despite May's pledges

 

 

OLD ARTICLE NOV 9th 2014

 

my bad y'all :ohno:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Returning Islamist fighters are being offered ‘jihadi rehab’ instead of prosecution for supporting blood-thirsty terrorist groups.
The vast majority of more than 300 young men who have arrived back from Syria and Iraq are being allowed to continue their normal lives.
Many have been offered places on the Government’s counter-radicalisation scheme, known as the Channel programme, which has seen a substantial rise in referrals.

Evidence of the ‘softer approach’ comes despite assurances from Home Secretary Theresa May that terrorist sympathisers will face the full force of the law.
She said new legislation should be ready by the end of this month as David Cameron insisted returning jihadists should face ‘criminal investigations and prosecution’.
Two Cardiff men who travelled to Syria have been allowed to return to their homes despite being arrested under the Terrorism Act.
Ahmed Mohammadi, 19, and Shahid Miah, 23, were released without charge and instead referred to Channel despite their close ties with Islamic State.

 

The scheme has seen a 58 per cent rise (from 748 to 1,281) in the number of referrals in the past year as the crisis in the Middle East grew.
Whitehall sources said one of the biggest problems is securing evidence of terrorist activities committed by Britons 2,000 miles away in Syria.
One told the Sunday Times that investigators also want to balance the approach towards returning jihadists with the need to avoid being perceived as ‘anti- Muslim’.

 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2827608/Returning-Islamist-fighters-offered-jihadi-rehab-instead-prosecution-supporting-blood-thirsty-terrorist-groups-despite-s-pledges.html  <read more here

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

good

lmao "without any solid evidence it's difficult to arrest and charge them" well yeah i should think so :confused:

this is 2 months old though

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

this is 2 months old though

ok my bad. someone linked it in another thread on reddit. i assumed it was current :flop:

 

 

leave it up or take it down? 

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok my bad. someone linked it in another thread on reddit. i assumed it was current :flop:

 

 

leave it up or take it down?

i'd probably leave it i don't know if there's a rule against it
Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd probably leave it i don't know if there's a rule against it

kinda feels like its still relevant.

 

i;ll add a discalimer to the OP and the mods will take it down if there is a problem with it

I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

kinda feels like its still relevant.

 

i;ll add a discalimer to the OP and the mods will take it down if there is a problem with it

it definitely is :sweat:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Um why are they not arresting them? Why even let them in the country at all? They are IS terrorists.

"I am the world's greatest person that does not want to let people into the country."—US President Donald J. Trump
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...