Lady Gaga is shooting a commerical for her perfume (featuring Scheiße)

[miju 375]

  On 2/15/2012 at 12:41 AM, SKANK said:

AIDS? I'm pretty sure half her fan base has that already. THAT IS A JOKE.

A bottle of Gonorrhea Perfume however, is worth 75$.

Oh **** :toofunny:

[Dirty Pony 5]

  On 2/14/2012 at 10:22 PM, nightcruiserx said:

**** YES!

Omg, way too excited

[JeVeuxTonAmour 6]

It's about time we get more info on the perfume!

Can't wait to see the bottle & smell what she's come up with.

When she was in Australia in July, she said on the radio that the perfume would smell like an expensive hooker.

:nacho:

[Stiletto Ninja 29]

  On 2/15/2012 at 12:44 AM, garnite said:

oh come oooooooooooooon. like she isn't rolling in it already. if she didn't sell out before, the time has come. there's no purpose to this. she just wants her fans to throw their money at her with this. there's no getting around it. perfumes are a mega franchise. paris hilton has like 13 perfumes? that should speak for itself!

money doesn't make any of these things better. that is incredibly self indulgent.

..... I'm honestly not sure if you're serious or not

She's still a pop singer and that type of thing is just part of the pop singer deal. She's still gone about it in an infinitely more respectable way than most in my opinion. Its not what's most important to her either way. Paris Hilton has 13 perfumes and a host of other useless **** because she's useless to society and her image is all she really has to offer. But regardless, its not a big deal. If you don't agree then don't buy it. Simple as that :)

Its infinitely less self indulgent than spending that money on fancy cars and mansions. And I never implied it would make those things better. But it is necessary when undergoing ambitious projects the way she does, especially when it comes to touring. She did go bankrupt during the Monster Ball because of how much it cost to put on, don't forget.

[Papasquat 517]

I want a cologne. :fat:

[garnite 8]

  On 2/15/2012 at 12:56 AM, Stiletto Ninja said:

She's still a pop singer and that type of thing is just part of the pop singer deal.

excuses. because you're labelled a pop singer it means you must do tacky things exclusively for money? i can't see how the two relate. sure, pop singers usually do that, but i thought gaga was about breaking down the barriers of what it means to be a pop singer or does that just not matter any more? she's going to make millions and millions from this. she's done fine without doing things like this. but by doing this, she's effectively putting herself on the same level as paris hilton.

sure it would be less self indulgent... if those things cost that much. i'm not sure you're aware of how much perfumes make. it is incongruent to what she would ever need to spend or would ever spend on performances. mark my words that her performances will not become more lavish. look at what she has done already without it.

it's not necessary for her at all! she's established! she's got so much money and she earns so much money already. money is not an option any more for her like it used to be. look at the price of the born this way ball tickets. you know the bigger the show she puts on, the more she is able to charge for her tickets and the more the tour will gross. she's not a struggling artist any more and never will be again.

Edited February 15, 2012 by garnite

[Shu Rin 64]

I wish i could wear perfume :cry:

[garnite 8]

and it is a perfume. the most pointless product ever.

[colours 128]

it's times like these that make me wish it was december 2008 again

[whiskey_mouth 0]

Celebrity perfumes are so incredibly tacky

Excited for how she'll incorporate Scheisse though.

[Stiletto Ninja 29]

  On 2/15/2012 at 1:04 AM, garnite said:

  Reveal hidden contents

excuses. because you're labelled a pop singer it means you must do tacky things exclusively for money? i can't see how the two relate. sure, pop singers usually do that, but i thought gaga was about breaking down the barriers of what it means to be a pop singer or does that just not matter any more? she's going to make millions and millions from this. she's done fine without doing things like this. but by doing this, she's effectively putting herself on the same level as paris hilton.

sure it would be less self indulgent... if those things cost that much. i'm not sure you're aware of how much perfumes make. it is incongruent to what she would ever need to spend or would ever spend on performances. mark my words that her performances will not become more lavish. look at what she has done already without it.

it's not necessary for her at all! she's established! she's got so much money and she earns so much money already. money is not an option any more for her like it used to be. look at the price of the born this way ball tickets. you know the bigger the show she puts on, the more she is able to charge for her tickets and the more the tour will gross. she's not a struggling artist any more and never will be again.

That's a little unnecessarily melodramatic don't you think? Its just a perfume. Not a big deal. It doesn't compromise her artistic integrity in any way regardless of what you choose to believe. Like I said, if you don't like it then don't buy it :/

[Queen Gloria 3,456]

Marco Da SIlva is one of Kylie's dancers. Well, he was. I wonder if he'll get the part

[PetiteMonstre 69]

  On 2/15/2012 at 1:23 AM, Stiletto Ninja said:

That's a little unnecessarily melodramatic don't you think? Its just a perfume. Not a big deal. It doesn't compromise her artistic integrity in any way regardless of what you choose to believe. Like I said, if you don't like it then don't buy it :/

Garnite is a very special person.

[RitaOral 1,322]

I have no problem with her doing something like this but i wish she wouldn't be all like 'I'm a musician not a celebrity' all the time. It just makes her look like a liar when she decides to cash in on releasing a perfume. Celebrities release perfumes not musicians, make your mind up Gaga.

[garnite 8]

  On 2/15/2012 at 1:23 AM, Stiletto Ninja said:

That's a little unnecessarily melodramatic don't you think? Its just a perfume. Not a big deal. It doesn't compromise her artistic integrity in any way regardless of what you choose to believe. Like I said, if you don't like it then don't buy it :/

i don't think so, no, because she's a celebrity, she's not my friend, she's making a commercial and she's marketing herself, i'm allowed to have opinions on it no matter how melodramatic (which i don't think i'm being, i'm just stating my view on this - my standards are different than yours and that's all) because as a gaga fan, she wants me to buy it or she wouldn't tweet it to her fans. i don't think it's just a perfume, it sets a double standard and goes against a lot of what she says. "i just want to focus on the music" is out the window now. but if you disagree that's ok too.