Melech 9,900 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 This sarcastic title by the magazine by the way, Is that picture shopped in any way? That looks like Dobby and Smeagol having a child? he was born this way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,099 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 OMG he was born this way I mean, that was my first impressions looking at the cover Don't you agree tho? (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Josh 3 Posted November 12, 2014 Author Share Posted November 12, 2014 I mean, that was my first impressions looking at the cover Don't you agree tho? Yes . Especially like Dobby :air:. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,099 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Yes . Especially like Dobby :air:. :air: (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Could've photoshopped the photo to give him a glowing complexion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXCXSXE 0 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Reminding people that even if he's elected person of the year, he's still still an homophobic person who isn't a good president ? it doesn't have to actively work against him, just reminding people that he shouldnt be praised is already something Person of the year isn't necessarily an honour... It certainly doesn't seem like it in this case. Did you read the OP? Stalin and Hitler have both been given the title by Time... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelbHawker 6,583 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Person of the year isn't necessarily an honour. Yeah but in society these days it's normally spoken with a positive connotation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXCXSXE 0 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Yeah but in society these days it's normally spoken with a positive connotation. Not really? Maybe to people who don't understand that the title is "for better or for worse"... People who probably don't follow current events or read TIME magazine in any case... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco 3,040 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Person of the year isn't necessarily an honour... It certainly doesn't seem like it in this case. Did you read the OP? Stalin and Hitler have both been given the title by Time... I know it's not an honour necessarily, but i'm sure some people see it like if it was one that's why reminding people how terrible he is isn't a bad thing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brizoda 4,177 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I don't see how that productively contributes to LGBT issues tbh, but that might just be me. I'm aware, I just think that to choose a man who negatively influenced LGBT issues as the most influential of the year is sending a rather uncomfortable message. Call me old-fashioned, but I still prefer inspiring figures as discussion topics. you're right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix 17,395 Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Could've photoshopped the photo to give him a glowing complexion that would slay the living souls 💎 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.