Jump to content

Woman who Gaga counter-sued: "They are suing me to scare YOU"


exoskeleton123

Featured Posts

retroglamx

I couldn't stop laughing and I only read some parts. This is some funny ****. LMAO.

Pink flamingos always fascinated me.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Sakrai

She says some very serious things in that document... :shocked:

 

And she sounds extremely pressed, which makes her lose all her credibility.

We as stans know more than her about Gaga, and we know most of that stuff is factually wrong.

 

she's a greedy af self obsessed wannabe artist #fact :kissga:

Oh, I'm just visiting-
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jonna Lee

Nah don't give her the attention she wants. The whole pseudo-martyr thing is too much

i like it when u treat me mean it turns my mood from black to blue
Link to post
Share on other sites

Koreku

Even before this letter was written I thought it was petty to sue her for 1.4 million dollars.

I get it, she lost the case, but she has a life and family. How is she supposed to pay 1.4 million? 

Let it go.

Yeah this, the backfire isn't really necessary. The case being dropped is fine enough. Poor Rebecca has to pay 1.4 million.  :fat:

You don't deserve a point of view if the only thing you see is you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

exoskeleton123

But why sue back for 1.4m thats just mean.

 

This I mean if Gaga was smart, she would just cover the stupid court costs herself and not make a big deal, I mean it's such a shame considering all the good publicity she's getting with C2C and now this stupid ho is trying to make gaga look bad... 

I'm just gonna go ahead and leave this here :teehee:

 

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rebecca-F/115988242124

 

LITTLE MONSTERS ATTACK! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duella Dvil

Can someone post the FULL song.

I'd like to know the comparison

www.instagram.com/theduella666
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicole

But why sue back for 1.4m thats just mean.

Most likely General deterrence. It discourages this behaviour for not only this girl but for anyone else who thinks they can squeeze money out of people who are "famous"

Link to post
Share on other sites

13VictorC

I thought Judas plagiarized Bad Romance.  :emma:

 

Didn't RedOne produce Judas? Not DJ White Shadow?

 

She wanted to write a story of betrayal, another "idea" of hers stolen by Gaga.  :manicure:

Link to post
Share on other sites

giskardsb

Normally I would be on the side of the small musician in this case, and truthfully I would have preferred if Gaga's team had let it go and not countersue.  But the central problem is that the songs sound nothing alike, outside of repeating "Juda" or "Judas".   At the best she could claim to have inspired Gaga to make her song, but you can't sue for copyright infringement for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am glad that Gaga is suing her. People have commonly taken lately to suing high profile artists to get attention. The Bellamy Brothers admitted this after they sued Britney for having a song with no similarities but a similar title. It is free publicity. Artists making legal threats should ultimately pay a consequence. Otherwise, it encourages this behavior. 

 

1.4 million is excessive though. I understand trying to regain some of the money lost fighting the case, and I understand the importance of deterring others but she doesn't have 1.4 million and Gaga is doing alright for herself.

Make her pay a smaller sum that isn't going to financially destroy her and her family. Surely they can work out a sum that she can actually pay, a sum that is of great expense to her, but isn't completely crippling. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...