Pure Adrenaline 1,518 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 U HAVE TO BE EITHER DEAF OR REALLY REALLY REALLY STUPID TO THINK THAT THESE 2 SONGS HAVE SOMETHING IN COMMON I CAN'T BELIEVE AFTER SO MUCH TIME WE ARE STILL DISCUSSING SUCH STUPID TOPIC LIKE THIS OOH AND BTW THE OOOOOOH ARE FROM BAD ROMANCE BITCH NOT UR STUPID SONG I JUST CAN'T ANYMORE THIS WOMAN'S STUPIDITY WILL PUT ME IN MELTDOWN MODE It's much more fun to have hizophrenia... u never get lonely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jeans 3,815 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 inb4 Gaga sues her again for difamation :reductive: Destiny is for losers. It’s just a stupid excuse to wait for things to happen instead of making them happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levine 23,597 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Let's not give us all the attention tho. We can't be fuming everytime an irrelevant says those things on Gaga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daviddarko 144 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Bye Rebecca and get lost Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoldenNovember 457 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 It's always the same: Some attention seeker sues a big star/company. And when they lose and get counter sued, they blame the BAD BAD industry for destroying the small people It's hard to light a candle, easy to curse the dark instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deagan 608 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Wether the songs are alike is now legally decided: no. However, Gaga counter sueing her is indeed a bit harsh. Gaga doesn't need it, and shouldn't have spent 1.4 million dollars on this simple civil case. Anyhow if she makes clear in court that she doesn't have this amount of money she'll just be declared bankrupt and get a new start. Gaga will deffinitely not be getting 1.4 million dollars back. But yes, Gaga "inc" would have destroyed her. So yes, counter sueing this woman is about intimidating others to sue her. She's right. That's a matter of taste though. Gaga herself probably wouldn't mind and say just let it go, but her surrounding people want those 1.4 million for a new car or something. This woman is panicking and it's normal/human and I kind of feel bad for her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swine killer 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Girl, stop. The songs sound NOTHING alike. That's like Amy Winehouse suing Taylor Swift for making a song called "Back to December" when she made a song titled "Back to Black." The songs sound nothing alike. The only similarity is a somewhat similar title. This b---h can leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SychosSoChic 9,995 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Gaga would probably have dropped it tbh, and maybe just wanted to scare her. BUT AFTER THIS LETTER YOU CAN BET SHE WON'T DROP IT NOW Get dem coins Gaga. Put fear into the hearts of all the greedy wannabe artists trying to make a quick buck off you. Life ain't Hollywood for any one of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Computer 10,973 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Why do these types of stories always come out at album release. :noparty: 💚💛💕❣⭕💢💢 | ⓜⓔⓡⓡⓨ ©ⓗⓡⓘⓢⓣⓜⓐⓢ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcane 208 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 lol at "Regular Humans", her twisting this into some Davids vs. Goliaths martyr essay. Rebecca, you lost. Juda and Judas sound completely different, wake up. Leave the public outta this. People like YOU should think twice before suing over some REACH involving songs. Love Trumps Hate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deagan 608 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 lol at "Regular Humans", her twisting this into some Davids vs. Goliaths martyr essay. Rebecca, you lost. Juda and Judas sound completely different, wake up. Leave the public outta this. People like YOU should think twice before suing over some REACH involving songs. She's not twisting anything. Gaga is sueing her this time around. This woman better pull the public in if she wants to start making money to get her back out of bankrupt. She thought twice about it, she gave it a shot. Backfired. Humans make mistakes. It's sad that this might ruin her life though. Hating all the "YAS GAGA GET DEM MONEYZ BACK" comments. So insensitive. My advice to this woman and Gaga is that they write or call eachother and figure it out outside of court. For example by having the woman admitting she was wrong and doing some promo at the tablets and blogs ect that have picked up the story. All this hurts Gaga's reputation in the end, which might be much more valuable than the 1.4 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haldy 1,258 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 She literally is a MESS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek4gaga 3 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Honey, it's a civil trial, not a criminal one. You're not guaranteed a trial by jury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrownClown 105 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Poor thing She should have won, Juda is a much better song than Judas Juda>>>>Judasjk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gongchuen 2 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 This woman was trying to gain publicity and attention from this lawsuit. Isn't it obvious that the two music are different?! Since she was the one who made so much of a loss for Gaga with 1.4 million gone. Of course , it will be justifiable for her to return a portion of the 1.4 million back to Gaga or EVEN THE FULL AMOUNT. To me Rebecca is just an utter disgrace and a pathetic desperate *****. #PEACEOUT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.